| Literature DB >> 30037063 |
Siying Chen1, Mei Li2,3, Yueting Li4, Hejia Hu5,6, Ying Li7,8, Yong Huang9, Lin Zheng10, Yuan Lu11, Jie Hu12,13, Yanyu Lan14, Aimin Wang15, Yongjun Li16, Zipeng Gong17, Yonglin Wang18.
Abstract
Erigeron breviscapus, a traditional Chinese medicine, is clinically used for the treatment of occlusive cerebral vascular diseases. We developed a sensitive and reliable ultra-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-MS/MS) method for simultaneous quantitation of chlorogenic acid, scutellarin, and scutellarein, the main active constituents in Erigeron breviscapus, and compared the pharmacokinetics of these active ingredients in sham-operated and middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) rats orally administrated with Erigeron breviscapus extract. Plasma samples were collected at 15 time points after oral administration of the Erigeron breviscapus extract. The levels of chlorogenic acid, scutellarin, and scutellarein in rat plasma at various time points were determined by a UPLC-ESI-MS/MS method, and the drug concentration versus time plots were constructed to estimate pharmacokinetic parameters. The concentration of chlorogenic acid in the plasma reached the maximum plasma drug concentration in about 15 min and was below the limit of detection after 4 h. Scutellarin and scutellarein showed the phenomenon of multiple absorption peaks in sham-operated and MCAO rats, respectively. Compared with the sham-operated rats, the terminal elimination half-life of scutellarein in the MCAO rats was prolonged by more than two times and the area under the curve of each component in the MCAO rats was significantly increased. The results showed chlorogenic acid, scutellarin, and scutellarein in MCAO rats had higher drug exposure than that in sham-operated rats, which provided a reference for the development of innovative drugs, optimal dosing regimens, and clinical rational drug use.Entities:
Keywords: Erigeron breviscapus extract; UPLC-ESI-MS/MS; cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury; scutellarein; scutellarin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30037063 PMCID: PMC6100312 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) chromatograms of ingredients in rat plasma: (a) blank plasma; (b) blank plasma spiked with three components and IS; and (c) plasma sample obtained 10 min after intragastric administration of Erigerin breviscapus extract (10 g/kg) (1. Chlorogenic acid; 2. puerarin (IS); 3. scutellarin; 4. scutellarein).
The mean values of regression equations of the three compounds.
| Analyte | Linear Regression Equation | R2 | Linear Ranges (μg/mL) | LOQ (μg/mL) | LOD (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic acid | Y = 0.333 | 0.9988 | 0.0246–3.15 | 0.0246 | 0.0112 |
| Scutellarin | Y = 0.140 | 0.9992 | 0.0116–5.94 | 0.0116 | 0.0042 |
| Scutellarein | Y = 0.409 | 0.9995 | 0.0192–3.94 | 0.0192 | 0.0075 |
The accuracy, intra-, and inter-day precision of the three analytes in rat plasma ( ± SD, n = 6, 3 days).
| Analyte | Concentration of Analyte (μg/mL) | Mean ± SD (μg/mL) | Accuracy (%) | Interday Precision RSD (%) | Intraday Precision RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic acid | 0.025 | 0.025 ± 0.004 | 103.0 ± 16.7 | 16.2 | 17.1 |
| 0.79 | 0.79 ± 0.059 | 99.9 ± 7.5 | 7.5 | 5.3 | |
| 3.15 | 3.14 ± 0.136 | 99.6 ± 4.3 | 4.3 | 6.8 | |
| Scutellarin | 0.012 | 0.014 ± 0.003 | 117.2 ± 21.9 | 18.6 | 14.5 |
| 0.37 | 0.37 ± 0.02 | 100.1 ± 5.3 | 5.3 | 3.9 | |
| 5.94 | 5.82 ± 0.278 | 98.0 ± 4.7 | 4.8 | 9 | |
| Scutellarein | 0.019 | 0.013 ± 0.002 | 80.1 ± 10.2 | 15 | 13.3 |
| 0.246 | 0.243 ± 0.05 | 98.8 ± 2.0 | 2.1 | 7.9 | |
| 3.94 | 3.99 ± 1.179 | 101.3 ± 3.0 | 3 | 5.7 |
The mean recoveries and matrix effects of the three analytes in rat plasma ( ± SD, n = 6).
| Analyte | Concentration of Analyte (μg/mL) | Extraction Recovery (%) | RSD (%) | Matrix Effect (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorogenic acid | 0.025 | 80.7 ± 10.0 | 12.4 | 86.8 ± 2.0 | 2.3 |
| 0.79 | 96.7 ± 12.9 | 13.3 | 91.4 ± 4.8 | 5.3 | |
| 3.15 | 80.9 ± 6.1 | 7.5 | 91.2 ± 3.5 | 3.8 | |
| Scutellarin | 0.012 | 101.1 ± 4.0 | 4 | 93.0 ± 7.3 | 7.8 |
| 0.37 | 102.1 ± 16.6 | 16.3 | 90.6 ± 9.0 | 9.9 | |
| 5.94 | 85.8 ± 13.6 | 15.9 | 89.3 ± 1.6 | 1.8 | |
| Scutellarein | 0.019 | 80.7 ± 14.8 | 18.3 | 98.9 ± 14.3 | 14.5 |
| 0.246 | 79.7 ± 5.9 | 7.4 | 88.6 ± 4.9 | 5.5 | |
| 3.94 | 80.3 ± 5.9 | 7.3 | 90.9 ± 1.6 | 1.8 |
The stability in autosampler for 6 h, three freeze-thaw cycles of the three compounds in rat plasma ( ± SD, n = 6).
| Analyte | Concentration of Analyte (μg/mL) | Sampler 6 h | Three Freeze-Thaw | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD (μg/mL) | Accuracy (%) | Precision (RSD, %) | Mean ± SD (μg/mL) | Accuracy (%) | Precision (RSD, %) | ||
| Chlorogenic acid | 0.025 | 0.025 ± 0.01 | 101 ± 14.8 | 14.5 | 0.021 ± 0.002 | 84.0 ± 7.7 | 9.1 |
| 0.79 | 0.76 ± 0.027 | 96.9 ± 3.4 | 3.5 | 0.73 ± 0.009 | 93.1 ± 1.1 | 1.2 | |
| 3.15 | 3.13 ± 0.131 | 99.5 ± 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.04 ± 0.070 | 96.5 ± 2.2 | 2.3 | |
| Scutellarin | 0.012 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 97.1 ± 5.9 | 6 | 0.01 ± 0.001 | 87.9 ± 3.1 | 3.5 |
| 0.37 | 0.37 ± 0.020 | 100 ± 5.3 | 5.2 | 0.34 ± 0.016 | 91.1 ± 4.2 | 4.6 | |
| 5.94 | 5.86 ± 0.222 | 98.6 ± 3.7 | 3.8 | 5.67 ± 0.217 | 95.5 ± 3.7 | 3.8 | |
| Scutellarein | 0.019 | 0.018 ± 0.002 | 94.1 ± 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.015 ± 0.003 | 78.5 ± 9.8 | 17.6 |
| 0.246 | 0.246 ± 0.007 | 100 ± 3.1 | 3.1 | 0.24 ± 0.015 | 96.1 ± 0.6 | 0.6 | |
| 3.94 | 4.02 ± 0.165 | 102 ± 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.83 ± 0.025 | 97.3 ± 0.6 | 0.7 | |
Figure 2The mean plasma concentration (μg/mL) of chlorogenic acid, scutellarin, and scutellarein vs. time (h) profiles after oral administration of Erigerin breviscapus extract (10 g·kg−1) in control and MACO model rats. Values were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 6).
The pharmacokinetic parameters of chlorogenic acid after intragastric dosing 10 g·kg−1 of Erigerin breviscapus extract to rats ( ± SD, n = 6).
| Pharmacokinetic Parameters | Unit | Chlorogenic Acid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MCAO | ||
| AUC(0–t) | mg/L·h | 0.31 ± 0.14 | 0.92 ± 0.21 * |
| AUC(0–∞) | mg/L·h | 0.31 ± 0.14 | 0.96 ± 0.28 * |
| MRT(0–t) | h | 0.59 ± 0.19 | 0.66 ± 0.23 |
| MRT(0–∞) | h | 0.60 ± 0.28 | 0.77 ± 0.28 |
| t1/2z | h | 0.48 ± 0.15 | 0.63 ± 0.14 |
| Tmax | h | 0.17 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.04 |
| CLZ/F | L/h/kg | 48.68 ± 2.77 | 18.69 ± 2.06 * |
| VZ/F | L/kg | 32.07 ± 5.36 | 11.98 ± 4.45 * |
| Cmax | mg/L | 0.90 ± 0.18 | 1.72 ± 0.33 * |
* p < 0.05 compared with control group.
The pharmacokinetic parameters of scutellarein after intragastric dosing 10 g·kg−1 of Erigerin breviscapus extract in the rats ( ± SD, n = 6).
| Pharmacokinetic Parameters | Unit | Scutellarein | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MCAO | ||
| AUC(0–t) | mg/L·h | 4.63 ± 1.55 | 12.93 ± 3.14 ** |
| AUC(0–∞) | mg/L·h | 4.69 ± 1.67 | 13.89 ± 3.48 ** |
| MRT(0–t) | h | 7.29 ± 2.12 | 9.77 ± 2.55 |
| MRT(0–∞) | h | 7.63 ± 2.31 | 10.57 ± 3.09 |
| t1/2z | h | 4.23 ± 1.37 | 5.75 ± 1.57 |
| Tmax | h | 0.14 ± 0.04 | 8.67 ± 2.73 ** |
| CLZ/F | L/h/kg | 2.94 ± 1.02 | 0.96 ± 0.28 ** |
| VZ/F | L/kg | 16.79 ± 4.51 | 9.66 ± 3.55 * |
| Cmax | mg/L | 1.24 ± 0.57 | 1.13 ± 0.66 |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 compared with control group.
The pharmacokinetic parameters of scutellarein after intragastric dosing of 10 g·kg−1 of Erigerin breviscapus extract to rats ( ± SD, n = 6).
| Pharmacokinetic Parameters | Unit | Scutellarein | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | MCAO | ||
| AUC(0–t) | mg/L*h | 4.56 ± 1.39 | 8.1 ± 2.29 * |
| AUC(0–∞) | mg/L*h | 5.58 ± 1.81 | 8.49 ± 3.17 * |
| MRT(0–t) | h | 6.7 ± 1.86 | 8.51 ± 2.48 |
| MRT(0–∞) | h | 7.99 ± 2.78 | 9.49 ± 3.66 |
| t1/2z | h | 4.18 ± 1.01 | 11.47 ± 2.83 * |
| Tmax | h | 2.11 ± 4.85 | 8 ± 2.19 * |
| CLZ/F | L/h/kg | 2.6 ± 1.61 | 0.88 ± 0.48 * |
| VZ/F | L/kg | 16.09 ± 9.47 | 9.85 ± 5.56 |
| Cmax | mg/L | 0.94 ± 0.47 | 1.04 ± 0.67 |
* p < 0.05 compared with control group.