Literature DB >> 30036284

Time Course of Recovery From Resistance Exercise With Different Set Configurations.

Fernando Pareja-Blanco1,2, David Rodríguez-Rosell1, Per Aagaard3, Luis Sánchez-Medina4, Juan Ribas-Serna5, Ricardo Mora-Custodio1, Carlos Otero-Esquina6, Juan Manuel Yáñez-García1, Juan José González-Badillo1.   

Abstract

Pareja-Blanco, F, Rodríguez-Rosell, D, Aagaard, P, Sánchez-Medina, L, Ribas-Serna, J, Mora-Custodio, R, Otero-Esquina, C, Yáñez-García, JM, and González-Badillo, JJ. Time course of recovery from resistance exercise with different set configurations. J Strength Cond Res 34(10): 2867-2876, 2020-This study analyzed the response to 10 resistance exercise protocols differing in the number of repetitions performed in each set (R) with respect to the maximum predicted number (P). Ten males performed 10 protocols (R(P): 6(12), 12(12), 5(10), 10(10), 4(8), 8(8), 3(6), 6(6), 2(4), and 4(4)). Three sets with 5-minute interset rests were performed in each protocol in bench press and squat. Mechanical muscle function (countermovement jump height and velocity against a 1 m·s load, V1-load) and biochemical plasma profile (testosterone, cortisol, growth hormone, prolactin, IGF-1, and creatine kinase) were assessed at several time points from 24-hour pre-exercise to 48-hour post-exercise. Protocols to failure, especially those in which the number of repetitions performed was high, resulted in larger reductions in mechanical muscle function, which remained reduced up to 48-hour post-exercise. Protocols to failure also showed greater increments in plasma growth hormone, IGF-1, prolactin, and creatine kinase concentrations. In conclusion, resistance exercise to failure resulted in greater fatigue accumulation and slower rates of neuromuscular recovery, as well as higher hormonal responses and greater muscle damage, especially when the maximal number of repetitions in the set was high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30036284     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  11 in total

Review 1.  Methods for Controlling and Reporting Resistance Training Proximity to Failure: Current Issues and Future Directions.

Authors:  Joshua C Pelland; Zac P Robinson; Jacob F Remmert; Rebecca M Cerminaro; Brian Benitez; Thomas A John; Eric R Helms; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 11.928

2.  Effects of training frequency on muscular strength for trained men under volume matched conditions.

Authors:  Emil Johnsen; Roland van den Tillaar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Differences between adjusted vs. non-adjusted loads in velocity-based training: consequences for strength training control and programming.

Authors:  Pedro Jiménez-Reyes; Adrian Castaño-Zambudio; Víctor Cuadrado-Peñafiel; Jorge M González-Hernández; Fernando Capelo-Ramírez; Luis M Martínez-Aranda; Juan J González-Badillo
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  The Effect of Load and Volume Autoregulation on Muscular Strength and Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Landyn M Hickmott; Philip D Chilibeck; Keely A Shaw; Scotty J Butcher
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-15

5.  High Dose of Caffeine Mouth Rinse Increases Resistance Training Performance in Men.

Authors:  Raci Karayigit; Mitat Koz; Angela Sánchez-Gómez; Alireza Naderi; Ulas Can Yildirim; Raúl Domínguez; Fatih Gur
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Using cluster and rest redistribution set structures as alternatives to resistance training prescription method based on velocity loss thresholds.

Authors:  Ivan Jukic; Eric R Helms; Michael R McGuigan; Amador García-Ramos
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Toward a New Paradigm in Resistance Training by Means of Velocity Monitoring: A Critical and Challenging Narrative.

Authors:  Juan José González-Badillo; Luis Sánchez-Medina; Juan Ribas-Serna; David Rodríguez-Rosell
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-09-16

8.  Effect of different training frequencies on maximal strength performance and muscle hypertrophy in trained individuals-a within-subject design.

Authors:  Ricardo P Neves; Felipe C Vechin; Emerson L Teixeira; Demostenys D da Silva; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Hamilton Roschel; André Y Aihara; Valmor Tricoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Equal-Volume Strength Training With Different Training Frequencies Induces Similar Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Improvement in Trained Participants.

Authors:  Håvard Hamarsland; Hermann Moen; Ole Johannes Skaar; Preben Wahlstrøm Jorang; Håvard Saeterøy Rødahl; Bent R Rønnestad
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  Velocity-Based Resistance Training on 1-RM, Jump and Sprint Performance: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Mateo Baena-Marín; Andrés Rojas-Jaramillo; Jhonatan González-Santamaría; David Rodríguez-Rosell; Jorge L Petro; Richard B Kreider; Diego A Bonilla
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.