Literature DB >> 30035533

Microplastics in Small Waterbodies and Tadpoles from Yangtze River Delta, China.

Lingling Hu1,2, Melissa Chernick2, David E Hinton2, Huahong Shi1.   

Abstract

Although microplastic (MP) pollution in freshwater systems is gaining attention, our knowledge of its distribution in small waterbodies is scarce. Small waterbodies are freshwater habitats to many species, including amphibians, that are vulnerable to MP pollution. This study analyzed the distribution and characteristics of MPs in 25 small waterbodies from the Yangtze River Delta, China. MPs were detected in surface water, sediment, and tadpoles with abundances ranging from 0.48 to 21.52 items L-1, 35.76 to 3185.33 items kg-1, and 0 to 2.73 items individual-1 (0 to 168.48 items g-1), respectively. The dominant shape and polymer of MPs in water and tadpole samples were polyester (PES) fibers, and polypropylene (PP) fibers and fragments were dominant in sediment samples. In addition, MPs were primarily <0.5 mm in length in all samples. Tadpole length was positively correlated to the number of MPs detected. The abundance, shape, and polymer distribution of MPs in tadpoles resembled that of water rather than sediment, suggesting that tadpoles likely take up MPs from the surrounding water. This study demonstrated that MPs are abundant in these small waterbodies and are ingested by resident tadpoles. This may suggest a pathway of MP entry into aquatic and terrestrial food webs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30035533     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

1.  Polystyrene microplastics did not affect body growth and swimming activity in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.

Authors:  Beatrice De Felice; Renato Bacchetta; Nadia Santo; Paolo Tremolada; Marco Parolini
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Microplastics in environment: global concern, challenges, and controlling measures.

Authors:  G Lamichhane; A Acharya; R Marahatha; B Modi; R Paudel; A Adhikari; B K Raut; S Aryal; N Parajuli
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Microplastic sampling techniques in freshwaters and sediments: a review.

Authors:  Nastaran Razeghi; Amir Hossein Hamidian; Chenxi Wu; Yu Zhang; Min Yang
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.027

4.  Occurrence and Quantification of Natural and Microplastic Items in Urban Streams: The Case of Mugnone Creek (Florence, Italy).

Authors:  Valentina Rimondi; Alessio Monnanni; Eleonora De Beni; Gabriele Bicocchi; David Chelazzi; Alessandra Cincinelli; Sara Fratini; Tania Martellini; Guia Morelli; Stefania Venturi; Pierfranco Lattanzi; Pilario Costagliola
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-03-26

Review 5.  Microplastics in Freshwater Biota: A Critical Review of Isolation, Characterization, and Assessment Methods.

Authors:  James D O'Connor; Anne Marie Mahon; Anja F R M Ramsperger; Benjamin Trotter; Paula E Redondo-Hasselerharm; Albert A Koelmans; Heather T Lally; Sinéad Murphy
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2019-03-06

6.  Chronic microfiber exposure in adult Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes).

Authors:  Lingling Hu; Melissa Chernick; Anna M Lewis; P Lee Ferguson; David E Hinton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Newly Emerging Airborne Pollutants: Current Knowledge of Health Impact of Micro and Nanoplastics.

Authors:  Alessio Facciolà; Giuseppa Visalli; Marianna Pruiti Ciarello; Angela Di Pietro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.