| Literature DB >> 30035203 |
Fengyan Tang1, Wei Zhang2, Iris Chi3, XinQi Dong4.
Abstract
Using data from the Population Study of Chinese Elderly in Chicago (PINE) conducted from 2011 to 2013, this study aims to examine the role of acculturation in engagement in cognitive, social, and religious activities among older Chinese Americans. Activity engagement and acculturation levels were relatively low in the study sample. Multivariate regression analyses showed that high levels of acculturation in general, and particularly media use (e.g., TV and radio) and ethnic social relations (i.e., preferred ethnicity of those with whom one interacts) were associated with more engagement in cognitive and social activities, respectively. High levels of acculturation in general and ethnic social relation in particular increased the likelihood of engaging in religious activities. Language use was not related to engagement in any activity, probably because only 2% of the PINE participants preferred to speak English. Findings indicate that acculturation can promote activity engagement probably through media use and social relations, whereby older adults may acquire information about opportunities for various activities. Active participation with life may improve older adults' well-being and help address the widening health disparities among minority older populations in American society.Entities:
Keywords: PINE; acculturation; activity engagement; older Chinese Americans
Year: 2018 PMID: 30035203 PMCID: PMC6050631 DOI: 10.1177/2333721418778198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gerontol Geriatr Med ISSN: 2333-7214
Descriptive of the PINE Participants (N = 3,157).
| Variables | |
|---|---|
| Age (range: 59-105) | 72.81 (8.30) |
| Female (%) | 57.97 |
| Education (range: 0-26) | 8.72 (5.05) |
| Income (range: 1-10) | 1.95 (1.14) |
| Years living in the United States (range: 0.1-90) | 20.02 (13.18) |
| Number of household members (range:0-10) | 1.87 (1.89) |
| Married (%) | 70.96 |
| Self-rated health (1-4) | 2.75 (.81) |
| Mobility (range: 0-3) | 0.72 (1.05) |
| Chronic conditions (range: 0-7) | 2.06 (4.13) |
| Perceived stress (range: 0-39) | 10.11 (6.55) |
| Discrimination (range: 0-8) | 0.29 (3.43) |
| Acculturation (range: 12-48) | 15.25 (5.12) |
| Language use (range: 5-25) | 5.67 (1.89) |
| Media use (range: 3-15) | 3.99 (2.44) |
| Ethnic social relation (range:4-20) | 5.66 (1.73) |
| Activity engagement | |
| Social activity (range: 0-15) | 8.87 (4.81) |
| Cognitive activity (range: 0-33) | 11.92 (5.90) |
| Religious activity (range: 0-6) | 0.91 (1.80) |
Note. PINE = Population Study of Chinese Elderly.
Correlation Coefficients Among Key Variables.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Acculuration | 1 | ||||||||||
| 2. Language use | .70 | 1 | |||||||||
| 3. Media use | .62 | .55 | 1 | ||||||||
| 4. Ethnic social relation | .86 | .46 | .34 | 1 | |||||||
| 5. Cognitive activity | .34 | .31 | .25 | .27 | 1 | ||||||
| 6. Social activity | .26 | .23 | .19 | .20 | .47 | 1 | |||||
| 7. Religious activity | .21 | .20 | .17 | .19 | .19 | .22 | 1 | ||||
| 8. Discrimination | .19 | .17 | .13 | .17 | .13 | .14 | .07 | 1 | |||
| 9. Stress | −.02 | −.04 | −.05 | .01 | −.15 | −.20 | .00 | .09 | 1 | ||
| 10.Self-rated health | −.09 | −.09 | −.12 | −.04 | −.10 | −.19 | −.03 | .05 | .36 | 1 | |
| 11.Mobility | −.11 | −.09 | −.07 | −.08 | −.12 | −.21 | −.01 | −.03 | .29 | .29 | 1 |
| 12.Chronic condition | .02 | .03 | .02 | .03 | .04 | −.02 | .06 | .08 | .14 | .32 | .26 |
p < .05. **p <. 01. ***p < .001.
OLS and Logistic Regression Analyses of Activity Engagement.
| Cognitive activity | Social activity | Religious activity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| OR | 95% CI | |
| Age | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.07 | 0.02 | 1.01 | [1.00, 1.03] |
| Female | −1.15 | 0.19 | −0.05 | 0.17 | 2.64 | [2.15, 3.24] |
| Education | 0.53 | 0.02 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 1.10 | [1.08, 1.12] |
| Income | −0.14 | 0.09 | −0.13 | 0.07 | 1.00 | [0.93, 1.09] |
| Years in living in the United States | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 1.00 | [0.99, 1.01] |
| Household members | −0.24 | 0.05 | −0.18 | 0.04 | 0.95 | [0.90, 1.00] |
| Married | −0.10 | 0.23 | −0.84 | 0.20 | 0.66 | [0.53, 0.81] |
| Self-rated health | −0.30 | 0.13 | −0.63 | 0.11 | 0.95 | [0.84, 1.08] |
| Mobility | −0.19 | 0.10 | −0.36 | 0.08 | 0.87 | [0.79, 0.96] |
| Chronic condition | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.06 | 1.06 | [0.99, 1.13] |
| Perceived stress | −0.09 | 0.01 | −0.09 | 0.01 | 1.00 | [0.99, 1.02] |
| Discrimination | 0.49 | 0.13 | 0.66 | 0.12 | 1.07 | [0.94, 1.13] |
| Acculturation[ | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 1.05 | [1.03, 1.07] |
| Language use[ | −0.09 | 0.07 | −0.07 | 0.06 | 1.00 | [0.94, 1.06] |
| Media use[ | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 1.04 | [1.00, 1.09] |
| Ethnic social relation[ | 0.27 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 1.14 | [1.07, 1.21] |
Note. Regression coefficients Bs on covariates were from Model 1, which were similar to those in Model 2. OLS = ordinary least squares; OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Model 1 included the summary score of acculturation and covariates.
Model 2 included three sub-scales, that is, language use, media use, and ethnic social relation and covariates.
p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.