Literature DB >> 30034096

Effects of scrambler therapy on pain and depression of patients with chronic low back pain: case study.

Ji-Won Han1, Dong-Kyu Lee2.   

Abstract

[Purpose] This study was designed to investigate the effect of scrambler therapy on the pain and depression of patients with chronic low back pain. [Subject and Methods] Applied scrambler therapy to a 52 year-old man who was diagnosed with chronic low back pain, for 40 minutes once a day during the 10-day execution. Pain and depression were measured using the visual analogue scale and the Beck Depression Inventory.
[Results] According to the measurement results, pain and depression decreased after ten sessions of scramble therapy.
[Conclusion] Scrambler therapy shows positive effects on pain and depression of patients with chronic low back pain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; Low back pain; Scrambler therapy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30034096      PMCID: PMC6047956          DOI: 10.1589/jpts.30.913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci        ISSN: 0915-5287


INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) occurs due to stress or weakening of tendons, joints, and muscles surrounding the backbone. In particular, LBP that lasts for more than 12 weeks is considered chronic LBP1). LBP is limited to the sacroiliac joints, hips, inguinal and femoral regions; however, it may accompany pain that radiates to the knee and even the end of the toes due to the stimulation of nerve roots2). In addition, chronic LBP is likely to cause patients to experience inconvenience in everyday life and may cause psychological problems, such as anxiety and depression, as it gets worse3). Scrambler therapy involves the creation of artificial neuron information that is transformed into a form of an electronic wavelength that reaches the brain through electrodes attached to aching parts, thus causing nociceptors to respond4). Scrambler therapy naturally affects the analgesia signal system of A-delta and C-fibers instead of blocking the pain routes5). Its purpose is to present a new treatment method to patients with intense pain, including chronic pain, cancer pain, and inveterate pain4, 6). Their symptoms tend to be unresponsive to and do not improve with typical treatment methods including drugs, injection therapy, and surgery6). However, scrambler therapy is not enough to confirm the pain and depression of patients with chronic LBP. This study was designed to investigate the effect of scrambler therapy on the pain and depression of patients with chronic LBP.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

This study is a single case study. The applied scrambler (GEOMC, Inc., Seoul, Korea) therapy to a 52 year-old man (weight: 169 cm, height: 65 kg) who was diagnosed with chronic LBP. He showed no abnormality in blood pressure, pulse, and breathing and had no symptoms of clouded consciousness or dysesthesia. Additionally, he read a full explanation of the study’s purpose and methods, and consented to this experiment. Investigational Review Board approval is not required if one or fewer cases are reported7). The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. We attached electrode-special types, whose frequency and stimulus strength were 43–52 Hz and 5 mA, respectively, to deliver electronic signals naturally to the body. They were placed on areas of the body located 2–3 cm away from a source of severe pain, through 5 channels. The scrambler has a total of 16 different wave patterns of non-analgesic information. Applied the scrambler therapy for 40 minutes, once a day for 10 days8). Pain was measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS is a measurement that involves a patient marking the degree of pain from 0 points to 10 points. On the VAS, 0 points equate with no pain while 10 points equate with the most severe pain. Depression was measured using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The BDI is a 4-point measurement method including 21 questions. Its total scores range from 0 to 63; 9 points, 10–15 points, 16–23 points, and 24–63 points equate with no depression, mild depression, depression, and serious depression, respectively.

RESULTS

The VAS score decreased from 8 to 1 after the scrambler therapy. The BDI score decreased from 22 to 7 after the scrambler therapy.

DISCUSSION

We concluded that scrambler therapy can decrease the symptoms of pain and depression in patients with chronic LBP. Scrambler therapy has been reported to decrease pain efficiently in different studies4, 6). According to the information theory, scrambler therapy recognizes a pain sensation as a piece of information, and thus artificially creates a non-analgesic signal after the scrambling to reach the brain through A-delta and C-fiber nociceptors6, 9). The non-analgesic signal is developed in the form of an electronic wavelength and encoded in various combinations to make the neural channel recognize it naturally9). We delivered the artificial neuron information to the nociceptor percutaneously as a wavelength signal, whose frequency and stimulus strength were 43–52 Hz and 5 mA, respectively4). This study showed the therapy can reduce various types of pain, including chronic pain, inveterate pain, cancer pain, and neuropathic pain by recovering normal neuroregulation functions autonomously in the brain4, 6, 9, 10). Existing pain treatments, including drugs, injection therapy, and surgery, block pain sensations in the pathway where any pain sensation is delivered from the central nervous system to the brain in order to stimulate A-beta nerves, and thus cause the brain to recognize less pain9, 10). However, scrambler therapy can exert its own non-analgesic signaling system on the pain pathway, rather than blocking the pathway10). Additionally, it has been reported to decrease the symptoms of pain or depression in different studies11). In summary, we conclude that scrambler therapy has a positive effect on decreasing pain and depression in patients with chronic LBP. The limitation of this study is that its results are difficult to generalize due to its small sample size. Furthermore, we were unable to carry out a follow-up study to investigate the post-treatment effect of scrambler therapy. Therefore, long-term research needs to be executed with a follow-up study involving more patients with chronic LBP so that the results of this study can be generalized.

Conflict of interest

None.
  11 in total

1.  Psychosocial differences between high-risk acute vs. chronic low back pain patients.

Authors:  Robert J Gatchel; Dana Bernstein; Anna W Stowell; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Efficacy of limited-duration spinal cord stimulation for subacute postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Masako Iseki; Yoshihito Morita; Yoshitaka Nakamura; Masataka Ifuku; Shuji Komatsu
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.473

Review 3.  North American Spine Society: failure of the pathology model to predict back pain.

Authors:  S Haldeman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Scrambler therapy.

Authors:  A F Sabato; G Marineo; A Gatti
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Pilot trial of a patient-specific cutaneous electrostimulation device (MC5-A Calmare®) for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Patrick J Coyne; Gwendolyn L Parker; Patricia Dodson; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  The effect of treatment with fentanyl patches on pain relief and improvement in overall daily functioning in patients with postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  S Mordarski; L Lysenko; H Gerber; M Zietek; T Gredes; M Dominiak
Journal:  J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.011

7.  Low back pain and depression: a study in a population of Mexican workers.

Authors:  Carlos Aceves-González; Lilia R Prado-Leon
Journal:  Work       Date:  2008

8.  Untreatable pain resulting from abdominal cancer: new hope from biophysics?

Authors:  Giuseppe Marineo
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2003-01

Review 9.  Diagnosis and management of low back pain and sciatica.

Authors:  A H Wheeler
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.292

10.  Effect of pain scrambler therapy on antineuralgic pain and quality of life after shingles.

Authors:  Yong-Nam Kim; Dong-Kyu Lee; Ho-Jeong Lee
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-06-07
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Inside the Scrambler Therapy, a Noninvasive Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic and Cancer Pain: From the Gate Control Theory to the Active Principle of Information.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marineo
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.279

2.  Efficacy of silver needle therapy for the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Xuesong Hu; Shaoxing Dong; Bing Zhang; Xuan Wang; Yanwei Yin; Chuansheng Liu; Junmin Yu; Xing Wu; Fenghu Xu; Chao Meng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Scrambler Therapy Enhances Quality of Life in Cancer Patients in a Palliative Care Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Komal Kashyap; Vishwajeet Singh; Sada Nand Dwivedi; Joris Gielen; Sushma Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2022-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.