CONTEXT: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting and persistent consequence of numerous classes of antineoplastic agents, affecting up to 30%-40% of patients. To date, there is no effective prevention or therapy. An evolving hypothesis for reducing CIPN pain involves direct nerve stimulation to reduce the pain impulse. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on CIPN associated with the MC5-A Calmare® therapy device. METHODS: The MC5-A Calmare® therapy device is designed to generate a patient-specific cutaneous electrostimulation to reduce the abnormal pain intensity. Sixteen patients from one center received one-hour interventions daily over 10 working days. RESULTS: Of 18 patients, 16 were evaluable. The mean age of the patients was 58.6 years-four men and 14 women-and the duration of CIPN was three months to eight years. The most common drugs were taxanes, platinums, and bortezomib (Velcade, Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge MA). At the end of the study (Day 10), a 20% reduction in numeric pain scores was achieved in 15 of 16 patients. The pain score fell 59% from 5.81±1.11 before treatment to 2.38±1.82 at the end of 10 days (P<0.0001 by paired t-test). A daily treatment benefit was seen with a strong statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-daily pain scores (P<0.001). Four patients had their CIPN reduced to zero. A repeated-measures analysis using the scores from all 10 days confirmed these results. No toxicity was seen. Some responses have been durable without maintenance. CONCLUSION: Patient-specific cutaneous electrostimulation with the MC5-A Calmare® device appears to dramatically reduce pain in refractory CIPN patients with no toxicity. Further studies are underway to define the benefit, mechanisms of action, and optimal schedule.
CONTEXT: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting and persistent consequence of numerous classes of antineoplastic agents, affecting up to 30%-40% of patients. To date, there is no effective prevention or therapy. An evolving hypothesis for reducing CIPN pain involves direct nerve stimulation to reduce the pain impulse. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on CIPN associated with the MC5-A Calmare® therapy device. METHODS: The MC5-A Calmare® therapy device is designed to generate a patient-specific cutaneous electrostimulation to reduce the abnormal pain intensity. Sixteen patients from one center received one-hour interventions daily over 10 working days. RESULTS: Of 18 patients, 16 were evaluable. The mean age of the patients was 58.6 years-four men and 14 women-and the duration of CIPN was three months to eight years. The most common drugs were taxanes, platinums, and bortezomib (Velcade, Millenium Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge MA). At the end of the study (Day 10), a 20% reduction in numeric pain scores was achieved in 15 of 16 patients. The pain score fell 59% from 5.81±1.11 before treatment to 2.38±1.82 at the end of 10 days (P<0.0001 by paired t-test). A daily treatment benefit was seen with a strong statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-daily pain scores (P<0.001). Four patients had their CIPN reduced to zero. A repeated-measures analysis using the scores from all 10 days confirmed these results. No toxicity was seen. Some responses have been durable without maintenance. CONCLUSION:Patient-specific cutaneous electrostimulation with the MC5-A Calmare® device appears to dramatically reduce pain in refractory CIPN patients with no toxicity. Further studies are underway to define the benefit, mechanisms of action, and optimal schedule.
Authors: N Attal; G Cruccu; M Haanpää; P Hansson; T S Jensen; T Nurmikko; C Sampaio; S Sindrup; P Wiffen Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Ravi D Rao; Patrick J Flynn; Jeff A Sloan; Gilbert Y Wong; Paul Novotny; David B Johnson; Howard M Gross; Samer I Renno; Mohammed Nashawaty; Charles L Loprinzi Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: J A Sloan; C L Loprinzi; S A Kuross; A W Miser; J R O'Fallon; M R Mahoney; I M Heid; M E Bretscher; N L Vaught Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Paolo Notaro; Carlo Alberto Dell'Agnola; Alessandro J Dell'Agnola; Alessio Amatu; Katia Bruna Bencardino; Salvatore Siena Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marianna Ricci; Sara Pirotti; Emanuela Scarpi; Marco Burgio; Marco Maltoni; Elisabetta Sansoni; Dino Amadori Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Jennifer S Gewandter; Jenna Chaudari; Chinazom Ibegbu; Rachel Kitt; Jennifer Serventi; Joy Burke; Eva Culakova; Noah Kolb; Kathleen A Sluka; Mohamedtaki A Tejani; Nimish A Mohile Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Charles Loprinzi; Jennifer G Le-Rademacher; Neil Majithia; Ryan P McMurray; Carrie R O'Neill; Markus A Bendel; Andreas Beutler; Daniel H Lachance; Andrea Cheville; David M Strick; David F Black; Jon C Tilburt; Thomas J Smith Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Grace A Kanzawa-Lee; Robert Knoerl; Clare Donohoe; Celia M Bridges; Ellen M Lavoie Smith Journal: Semin Oncol Nurs Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 2.315
Authors: Maureen A Mealy; Sharon L Kozachik; Lawrence J Cook; Lauren Totonis; Ruth Andrea Salazar; Jerilyn K Allen; Marie T Nolan; Thomas J Smith; Michael Levy Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-04-08 Impact factor: 9.910