Literature DB >> 24509456

Using frailty to predict who will fail early discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with an established recovery pathway.

Deborah S Keller1, Blake Bankwitz, Tamar Nobel, Conor P Delaney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite laparoscopy and enhanced recovery pathways, some patients do not attain early discharge. Frailty is generally accepted as a marker of increased risk, complications, and mortality. Frailty may have the potential to identify patient outcomes.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate frailty as a predictor of patients who might fail early discharge.
SETTING: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center.
DESIGN: This was a case-matched study. PATIENTS: Elective abdominal laparoscopic colorectal cases from 2009 to 2012 were selected.
METHODS: Review of a prospective database matched all cases with a postoperative day of discharge of ≤3 days to a >3 day of discharge cohort. All patients followed a standardized enhanced recovery pathway. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Categorical and ordinal variables were analyzed with the Student t test or Fisher exact test, and correspondence analysis evaluated the relationship between length of stay and the Modified Frailty Index. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was the relationship between length of stay and the Modified Frailty Index.
RESULTS: There were 464 ≤3 day and 388 >3 day patients. The groups were similar in demographics and comorbidities. There were significant differences in the Modified Frailty Index (p < 0.01), operative time (p < 0.01), postoperative complications (p < 0.01), 30-day readmissions (p = 0.03), and 30-day reoperation rate (p < 0.01). Significantly more patients were discharged home in the ≤3 day cohort. Correspondence analysis demonstrated a higher Modified Frailty Index was indicative of longer length of stay. A Modified Frailty Index of 0 was strongly related to a length of stay 0 to 3 days, and a Modified Frailty Index of 2 was strongly related to a 8- to 14-day stay. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center study performed on a retrospective data set.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with a higher Modified Frailty Index were more likely not to attain early discharge. Despite similar demographics, the Modified Frailty Index could discriminate between patient outcomes, and correlated with longer operating times, length of stay, and readmissions. By using a prospective score to identify patients at risk for not achieving early discharge preoperatively, resources and postoperative support can be better allocated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24509456     DOI: 10.1097/01.dcr.0000442661.76345.f5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  24 in total

1.  Factors associated with failure of enhanced recovery programs after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Heung-Kwon Oh; Myong Hun Ihn; Il Tae Son; Jin Taek Park; Jaebong Lee; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Can routine preoperative data predict adverse outcomes in the elderly? Development and validation of a simple risk model incorporating a chart-derived frailty score.

Authors:  Levana G Amrock; Mark D Neuman; Hung-Mo Lin; Stacie Deiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Impact of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A C Panayi; A R Orkaby; D Sakthivel; Y Endo; D Varon; D Roh; D P Orgill; R L Neppl; H Javedan; S Bhasin; I Sinha
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Factors predicting outcome from enhanced recovery programmes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  David E Messenger; Nathan J Curtis; Adam Jones; Emma L Jones; Neil J Smart; Nader K Francis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 6.  Frailty in surgical patients.

Authors:  Simon J G Richards; Frank A Frizelle; John A Geddes; Tim W Eglinton; Mark B Hampton
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Applying Enhanced Recovery Pathways to Unique Patient Populations.

Authors:  Grace C Lee; Richard A Hodin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28

Review 8.  Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  W Konrad Karcz; William von Braun
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-08

Review 9.  Complex and Reoperative Colorectal Surgery: Setting Expectations and Learning from Experience.

Authors:  Cindy Kin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

10.  Postoperative bleeding risk prediction for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  David Chen; Naveed Afzal; Sunghwan Sohn; Elizabeth B Habermann; James M Naessens; David W Larson; Hongfang Liu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.