Literature DB >> 30032367

Response to "A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations".

Devin M Cox1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 30032367     DOI： 10.1007/s10897-018-0280-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN： 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Surveillance or surgery? A description of the factors that influence high risk premenopausal women's decisions about prophylactic oophorectomy.

Authors:  N Hallowell; I Jacobs; M Richards; J Mackay; M Gore
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Amy P M Finch; Jan Lubinski; Pål Møller; Christian F Singer; Beth Karlan; Leigha Senter; Barry Rosen; Lovise Maehle; Parviz Ghadirian; Cezary Cybulski; Tomasz Huzarski; Andrea Eisen; William D Foulkes; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Nadine Tung; Henry T Lynch; Susan Neuhausen; Kelly A Metcalfe; Islay Thompson; Joan Murphy; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Salpingo-oophorectomy and the risk of ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation.

Authors:  Amy Finch; Mario Beiner; Jan Lubinski; Henry T Lynch; Pal Moller; Barry Rosen; Joan Murphy; Parviz Ghadirian; Eitan Friedman; William D Foulkes; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Teresa Wagner; Nadine Tung; Fergus Couch; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Peter Ainsworth; Mary Daly; Babara Pasini; Ruth Gershoni-Baruch; Charis Eng; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Jane McLennan; Beth Karlan; Jeffrey Weitzel; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A Psychological Perspective on Factors Predicting Prophylactic Salpingo-Oophorectomy in a Sample of Italian Women from the General Population. Results from a Hypothetical Study in the Context of BRCA Mutations.

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Alessandra Tasso; Marzena Franiuk; Liliana Varesco; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Radka Platte; Elena Fineberg; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind A Eeles; Julian Adlard; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Lisa Walker; Mary E Porteous; Patrick J Morrison; Lucy E Side; M John Kennedy; Catherine Houghton; Alan Donaldson; Mark T Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Helen Gregory; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Barwell; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 6.  Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tammy C Hoffmann; Chris Del Mar
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Clinical outcome of prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers and events during follow-up.

Authors:  R I Olivier; M van Beurden; M A C Lubsen; M A Rookus; T M Mooij; M J van de Vijver; L J van't Veer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 7.640
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor: Response to Cox (2018).

Authors:  Teresa Gavaruzzi; Alessandra Tasso; Marzena Franiuk; Liliana Varesco; Lorella Lotto
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.537
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.