Literature DB >> 30032240

MendelProb: probability and sample size calculations for Mendelian studies of exome and whole genome sequence data.

Zongxiao He1, Lu Wang2, Andrew T DeWan3, Suzanne M Leal1.   

Abstract

Motivation: For the design of genetic studies, it is necessary to perform power calculations. Although for Mendelian traits the power of detecting linkage for pedigree(s) can be determined, it is also of great interest to determine the probability of identifying multiple pedigrees or unrelated cases with variants in the same gene. For many diseases, due to extreme locus heterogeneity this probability can be small. If only one family is observed segregating a variant classified as likely pathogenic or of unknown significance, the gene cannot be implicated in disease etiology. The probability of identifying several disease families or cases is dependent on the gene-specific disease prevalence and the sample size. The observation of multiple disease families or cases with variants in the same gene as well as evidence of pathogenicity from other sources, e.g. in silico prediction, expression and functional studies, can aid in implicating a gene in disease etiology. MendelProb can determine the probability of detecting a minimum number of families or cases with variants in the same gene. It can also calculate the probability of detecting genes with variants in different data types, e.g. identifying a variant in at least one family that can establish linkage and more the two additional families regardless of their size. Additionally, for a specified probability MendelProb can determine the number of probands which need to be screened to detect a minimum number of individuals with variants within the same gene.
Results: A single Mendelian disease family is not sufficient to implicate a gene in disease etiology. It is necessary to observe multiple families or cases with potentially pathogenic variants in the same gene. MendelProb, an R library, was developed to determine the probability of observing multiple families and cases with variants within a gene and to also establish the numbers of probands to screen to detect multiple observations of variants within a gene. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/statgenetics/mendelprob.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30032240      PMCID: PMC6397596          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  5 in total

Review 1.  Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Jurg Ott; Jing Wang; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Genetic dissection of complex traits: guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results.

Authors:  E Lander; L Kruglyak
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Estimating the power of a proposed linkage study: a practical computer simulation approach.

Authors:  M Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Comprehensive genetic testing in the clinical evaluation of 1119 patients with hearing loss.

Authors:  Christina M Sloan-Heggen; Amanda O Bierer; A Eliot Shearer; Diana L Kolbe; Carla J Nishimura; Kathy L Frees; Sean S Ephraim; Seiji B Shibata; Kevin T Booth; Colleen A Campbell; Paul T Ranum; Amy E Weaver; E Ann Black-Ziegelbein; Donghong Wang; Hela Azaiez; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 4.132

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.