S J Xu1, E A Heller2. 1. Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics and Penn Epigenetics Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: eheller@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing has been widely applied to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying neurological and psychiatric disorders. The large body of data support the role of epigenetic mechanisms in neurological function of both human and animals. Yet, the existing data is limited by the fact that epigenetic and transcriptomic changes have only been measured in separate cohorts. This has limited precise correlation of epigenetic changes in gene expression. NEW METHOD: Single Sample Sequencing (S3EQ) is an innovative approach to analyze both epigenetic and transcriptomic regulation within a single neuronal sample. Using this method, we analyzed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)- and RNA-sequencing data from the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of the same animal. RESULTS: ChIP-S3EQ of neuronal nuclei reliably identified hPTM enrichment in the adult mouse NAc with high precision. Comparing cellular compartments, we found that the spliceosome of whole cell RNA-seq was more closely recapitulated by cytosolic RNA-S3EQ than nuclear RNA-seq. Finally, S3EQ showed increased sensitivity for correlating chromatin modifications with gene expression, especially for lowly expressed transcripts. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: S3EQ accurately generates both RNA- and ChIP-seq from a single sample, providing a clear advantage over existing methods which require two samples. ChIP-S3EQ performance was comparable to ChIP-seq, while RNA-S3EQ generated an almost identical expression profile to nuclear-enriched and whole cell RNA-seq. Finally, we directly compared RNA-seq by cellular compartments, addressing a limitation of RNA-seq studies limited to neuronal nuclei. CONCLUSION: The S3EQ method can be applied to improve the correlative power of transcriptomic and epigenomic studies in neuronal tissue.
BACKGROUND: High-throughput sequencing has been widely applied to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying neurological and psychiatric disorders. The large body of data support the role of epigenetic mechanisms in neurological function of both human and animals. Yet, the existing data is limited by the fact that epigenetic and transcriptomic changes have only been measured in separate cohorts. This has limited precise correlation of epigenetic changes in gene expression. NEW METHOD: Single Sample Sequencing (S3EQ) is an innovative approach to analyze both epigenetic and transcriptomic regulation within a single neuronal sample. Using this method, we analyzed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)- and RNA-sequencing data from the nucleus accumbens (NAc) of the same animal. RESULTS: ChIP-S3EQ of neuronal nuclei reliably identified hPTM enrichment in the adult mouseNAc with high precision. Comparing cellular compartments, we found that the spliceosome of whole cell RNA-seq was more closely recapitulated by cytosolic RNA-S3EQ than nuclear RNA-seq. Finally, S3EQ showed increased sensitivity for correlating chromatin modifications with gene expression, especially for lowly expressed transcripts. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: S3EQ accurately generates both RNA- and ChIP-seq from a single sample, providing a clear advantage over existing methods which require two samples. ChIP-S3EQ performance was comparable to ChIP-seq, while RNA-S3EQ generated an almost identical expression profile to nuclear-enriched and whole cell RNA-seq. Finally, we directly compared RNA-seq by cellular compartments, addressing a limitation of RNA-seq studies limited to neuronal nuclei. CONCLUSION: The S3EQ method can be applied to improve the correlative power of transcriptomic and epigenomic studies in neuronal tissue.
Authors: Makoto Taniguchi; Maria B Carreira; Yonatan A Cooper; Ana-Clara Bobadilla; Jasper A Heinsbroek; Nobuya Koike; Erin B Larson; Evan A Balmuth; Brandon W Hughes; Rachel D Penrod; Jaswinder Kumar; Laura N Smith; Daniel Guzman; Joseph S Takahashi; Tae-Kyung Kim; Peter W Kalivas; David W Self; Yingxi Lin; Christopher W Cowan Journal: Neuron Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Caryn S Ross-Innes; Rory Stark; Andrew E Teschendorff; Kelly A Holmes; H Raza Ali; Mark J Dunning; Gordon D Brown; Ondrej Gojis; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Simak Ali; Suet-Feung Chin; Carlo Palmieri; Carlos Caldas; Jason S Carroll Journal: Nature Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Vincenzo A Gennarino; Ravi K Singh; Joshua J White; Antonia De Maio; Kihoon Han; Ji-Yoen Kim; Paymaan Jafar-Nejad; Alberto di Ronza; Hyojin Kang; Layal S Sayegh; Thomas A Cooper; Harry T Orr; Roy V Sillitoe; Huda Y Zoghbi Journal: Cell Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Diane M Damez-Werno; HaoSheng Sun; Kimberly N Scobie; Ningyi Shao; Jaclyn Rabkin; Caroline Dias; Erin S Calipari; Ian Maze; Catherine J Pena; Deena M Walker; Michael E Cahill; Ramesh Chandra; Amy Gancarz; Ezekiell Mouzon; Joseph A Landry; Hannah Cates; Mary-Kay Lobo; David Dietz; C David Allis; Ernesto Guccione; Gustavo Turecki; Paola Defilippi; Rachael L Neve; Yasmin L Hurd; Li Shen; Eric J Nestler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eduardo Javier Lopez Soto; Michael J Gandal; Thomas Gonatopoulos-Pournatzis; Elizabeth A Heller; Diou Luo; Sika Zheng Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Song-Jun Xu; Sonia I Lombroso; Delaney K Fischer; Marco D Carpenter; Dylan M Marchione; Peter J Hamilton; Carissa J Lim; Rachel L Neve; Benjamin A Garcia; Mathieu E Wimmer; R Christopher Pierce; Elizabeth A Heller Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-09-03 Impact factor: 18.688
Authors: Marco D Carpenter; Qiwen Hu; Allison M Bond; Sonia I Lombroso; Kyle S Czarnecki; Carissa J Lim; Hongjun Song; Mathieu E Wimmer; R Christopher Pierce; Elizabeth A Heller Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 14.919