Renee Grenon1, Alena McKenna1, Hilary Maxwell1, Samantha Carlucci1, Agostino Brugnera2, Dominique Schwartze3, Nicole Hammond4, Iryna Ivanova5, Nancy Mcquaid6, Genevieve Proulx7, Giorgio A Tasca1,4,7. 1. School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Human and Social Sciences, University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy. 3. Institute of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. 4. Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 5. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 6. Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included direct comparisons of psychotherapy for adults with an eating disorder (ED). METHOD: Thirty-five direct comparison RCTs of psychotherapy for adults diagnosed with an ED were rated using the Randomized Controlled Trials Psychotherapy Quality Rating Scale (RCT-PQRS). RESULTS: The mean total RCT-PQRS score (mean = 28.26; SD = 7.04) was in line with those that were reported for RCTs of psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders. Several standards of quality were unfulfilled by over half of the RCTs of treatment for EDs, including therapist supervision while treatment was being provided (62.9% unfulfilled); outcome assessment performed by raters blind to treatment group/condition (54% unfulfilled); and adequate sample size (66% unfulfilled). More recent RCTs were of higher quality, and higher quality was moderately associated with lower effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the quality of RCTs of psychotherapy of EDs, we recommend that researchers address the quality criteria listed in the RCT-PQRS. Psychotherapy trials should be registered, have a published protocol, and be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. Authors should take into account the quality of the research when using that research to inform ED treatment guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included direct comparisons of psychotherapy for adults with an eating disorder (ED). METHOD: Thirty-five direct comparison RCTs of psychotherapy for adults diagnosed with an ED were rated using the Randomized Controlled Trials Psychotherapy Quality Rating Scale (RCT-PQRS). RESULTS: The mean total RCT-PQRS score (mean = 28.26; SD = 7.04) was in line with those that were reported for RCTs of psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders. Several standards of quality were unfulfilled by over half of the RCTs of treatment for EDs, including therapist supervision while treatment was being provided (62.9% unfulfilled); outcome assessment performed by raters blind to treatment group/condition (54% unfulfilled); and adequate sample size (66% unfulfilled). More recent RCTs were of higher quality, and higher quality was moderately associated with lower effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS: To improve the quality of RCTs of psychotherapy of EDs, we recommend that researchers address the quality criteria listed in the RCT-PQRS. Psychotherapy trials should be registered, have a published protocol, and be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. Authors should take into account the quality of the research when using that research to inform ED treatment guidelines.
Authors: Nathan C Thoma; Dean McKay; Andrew J Gerber; Barbara L Milrod; Anna R Edwards; James H Kocsis Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Virginia V W McIntosh; Jennifer Jordan; Frances A Carter; Suzanne E Luty; Janice M McKenzie; Cynthia M Bulik; Christopher M A Frampton; Peter R Joyce Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: John March; Susan Silva; Stephen Petrycki; John Curry; Karen Wells; John Fairbank; Barbara Burns; Marisa Domino; Steven McNulty; Benedetto Vitiello; Joanne Severe Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-10-18
Authors: Christopher G Fairburn; Suzanne Bailey-Straebler; Shawnee Basden; Helen A Doll; Rebecca Jones; Rebecca Murphy; Marianne E O'Connor; Zafra Cooper Journal: Behav Res Ther Date: 2015-04-22