Literature DB >> 30027970

The tactile receptive fields of freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes.

E A Mazzochette1, A L Nekimken2, F Loizeau3, J Whitworth3, B Huynh3, M B Goodman2, B L Pruitt4.   

Abstract

Sensory neurons embedded in skin are responsible for the sense of touch. In humans and other mammals, touch sensation depends on thousands of diverse somatosensory neurons. By contrast, Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes have six gentle touch receptor neurons linked to simple behaviors. The classical touch assay uses an eyebrow hair to stimulate freely moving C. elegans, evoking evasive behavioral responses. This assay has led to the discovery of genes required for touch sensation, but does not provide control over stimulus strength or position. Here, we present an integrated system for performing automated, quantitative touch assays that circumvents these limitations and incorporates automated measurements of behavioral responses. The Highly Automated Worm Kicker (HAWK) unites a microfabricated silicon force sensor holding a glass bead forming the contact surface and video analysis with real-time force and position control. Using this system, we stimulated animals along the anterior-posterior axis and compared responses in wild-type and spc-1(dn) transgenic animals, which have a touch defect due to expression of a dominant-negative α-spectrin protein fragment. As expected from prior studies, delivering large stimuli anterior and posterior to the mid-point of the body evoked a reversal and a speed-up, respectively. The probability of evoking a response of either kind depended on stimulus strength and location; once initiated, the magnitude and quality of both reversal and speed-up behavioral responses were uncorrelated with stimulus location, strength, or the absence or presence of the spc-1(dn) transgene. Wild-type animals failed to respond when the stimulus was applied near the mid-point. These results show that stimulus strength and location govern the activation of a characteristic motor program and that the C. elegans body surface consists of two receptive fields separated by a gap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027970      PMCID: PMC6168290          DOI: 10.1039/c8ib00045j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  52 in total

1.  Responses of human mechanoreceptive afferents to embossed dot arrays scanned across fingerpad skin.

Authors:  J R Phillips; R S Johansson; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Whole-brain calcium imaging with cellular resolution in freely behaving Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Nguyen; Frederick B Shipley; Ashley N Linder; George S Plummer; Mochi Liu; Sagar U Setru; Joshua W Shaevitz; Andrew M Leifer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Piezoresistive Cantilever Performance-Part II: Optimization.

Authors:  Sung-Jin Park; Joseph C Doll; Ali J Rastegar; Beth L Pruitt
Journal:  J Microelectromech Syst       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.417

4.  Location and intensity discrimination in the leech local bend response quantified using optic flow and principal components analysis.

Authors:  Serapio M Baca; Eric E Thomson; William B Kristan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area.

Authors:  R S Johansson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Phospholipids that contain polyunsaturated fatty acids enhance neuronal cell mechanics and touch sensation.

Authors:  Valeria Vásquez; Michael Krieg; Dean Lockhead; Miriam B Goodman
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  The MEC-4 DEG/ENaC channel of Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons transduces mechanical signals.

Authors:  Robert O'Hagan; Martin Chalfie; Miriam B Goodman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-05       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  The major alpha-tubulin K40 acetyltransferase alphaTAT1 promotes rapid ciliogenesis and efficient mechanosensation.

Authors:  Toshinobu Shida; Juan G Cueva; Zhenjie Xu; Miriam B Goodman; Maxence V Nachury
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Optogenetic manipulation of neural activity in freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Andrew M Leifer; Christopher Fang-Yen; Marc Gershow; Mark J Alkema; Aravinthan D T Samuel
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-01-16       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Mechanical control of the sense of touch by β-spectrin.

Authors:  Michael Krieg; Alexander R Dunn; Miriam B Goodman
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  4 in total

1.  Somatosensory neurons integrate the geometry of skin deformation and mechanotransduction channels to shape touch sensing.

Authors:  Alessandro Sanzeni; Samata Katta; Bryan Petzold; Beth L Pruitt; Miriam B Goodman; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Temporal processing and context dependency in Caenorhabditis elegans response to mechanosensation.

Authors:  Mochi Liu; Anuj K Sharma; Joshua W Shaevitz; Andrew M Leifer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  A high-throughput method to deliver targeted optogenetic stimulation to moving C. elegans populations.

Authors:  Mochi Liu; Sandeep Kumar; Anuj K Sharma; Andrew M Leifer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 4.  How Caenorhabditis elegans Senses Mechanical Stress, Temperature, and Other Physical Stimuli.

Authors:  Miriam B Goodman; Piali Sengupta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.562

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.