Literature DB >> 30027743

Lead Levels at the Tap and Consumer Exposure from Legacy and Recent Lead Service Line Replacements in Six Utilities.

Elise Deshommes1, Benjamin Trueman2, Ian Douglas3, Dan Huggins4, Laurent Laroche5, Jeff Swertfeger6, Abby Spielmacher7, Graham A Gagnon2, Michèle Prévost1.   

Abstract

Profile, regulatory, and investigative sampling were completed in six utilities to study the impact of partial and full lead service line replacements (LSLRs) on water lead levels (WLLs) and consumer's exposure. As compared to households with no replacement, lead release after partial LSLR (PLSLR) was generally greater in the short term (3-50 days), and comparable or lower in the medium (<2 years) and long-term (>2 years). This was mainly explained by insufficient time elapsed to stabilize scales after disturbances to the service line. One utility showed sustained lead release over 18 months after PLSLR. Moreover, the reduction in WLLs was small when analyzing results for the same households. As a comparison, full LSLR decreased WLLs drastically and immediately. The occurrence of low (0-5 μg/L) to high (≥50 μg/L) WLLs in the profiles varied between households and reflected the variability of exposure among households in the same system. Using this probability of occurrence, the distribution of WLLs of exposure was estimated for households with or without a PLSLR, and used to model young children blood lead levels (BLLs) for both groups of households. The range of modeled BLLs decreased slightly for households with PLSLR, but still overlapped the range estimated for households with no replacement. This analysis suggests that, in a system, PLSLRs do not reduce young children blood lead levels except in a fraction of households.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027743     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Field analyzers for lead quantification in drinking water samples.

Authors:  Evelyne Doré; Darren A Lytle; Lauren Wasserstrom; Jeff Swertfeger; Simoni Triantafyllidou
Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 12.561

2.  Rapid and simple lead service line detection screening protocol using water sampling.

Authors:  Michael R Schock; Darren A Lytle; Ryan R James; Vivek Lal; Min Tang
Journal:  AWWA Water Sci       Date:  2021-10-27

3.  Mixed organic and inorganic tapwater exposures and potential effects in greater Chicago area, USA.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Maria Argos; Dana W Kolpin; Shannon M Meppelink; Kristin M Romanok; Kelly L Smalling; Michael J Focazio; Joshua M Allen; Julie E Dietze; Michael J Devito; Ariel R Donovan; Nicola Evans; Carrie E Givens; James L Gray; Christopher P Higgins; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Celeste A Journey; Rachael F Lane; Zachary R Laughrey; Keith A Loftin; R Blaine McCleskey; Carrie A McDonough; Elizabeth Medlock-Kakaley; Michael T Meyer; Andrea R Putz; Susan D Richardson; Alan E Stark; Christopher P Weis; Vickie S Wilson; Abderrahman Zehraoui
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 10.753

Review 4.  Variability and sampling of lead (Pb) in drinking water: Assessing potential human exposure depends on the sampling protocol.

Authors:  Simoni Triantafyllidou; Jonathan Burkhardt; Jennifer Tully; Kelly Cahalan; Michael DeSantis; Darren Lytle; Michael Schock
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 9.621

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.