Literature DB >> 30027499

Study Design of the Graft Patency After FFR-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided CABG Trial (GRAFFITI).

Gabor G Toth1,2, Bernard De Bruyne2, Petr Kala3, Flavio L Ribichini4, Filip Casselman2, Ruben Ramos5, Zsolt Piroth6, Stephane Fournier2, Carlos Van Mieghem2, Martin Penicka2, Martin Mates7, Frank Van Praet2, Ivan Degriek2, Emanuele Barbato8,9.   

Abstract

Clinical benefit of invasive functionally guided revascularization has been mostly investigated and proven for percutaneous coronary intervention. It has never been prospectively evaluated whether a systematic fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment is also beneficial in guiding coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). The objective of the GRAft patency after FFR-guided versus angiography-guIded CABG (GRAFFITI) trial was to compare an FFR-guided revascularization strategy to the traditional angiography-guided revascularization strategy for patients undergoing CABG. Patients were enrolled with significantly diseased left anterior descending or left main stem and at least one major coronary artery with angiographically intermediate stenosis (30-90% diameter stenosis) that was assessed by FFR. Thereafter, while the FFR values were kept concealed, cardiac surgeons decided their intended procedural strategy based on the coronary angiography alone. At this point, patients underwent 1:1 randomization to either an FFR-guided or an angiography-guided CABG strategy. In case the patient was randomized to angiography-guided arm, cardiac surgeons kept their intended procedural strategy, i.e., CABG was guided solely on the basis of the coronary angiography. In case the patient was randomized to the FFR-guided arm, FFR values were disclosed to the surgeons who revised the surgical protocol according to the functional significance of each coronary stenosis. The primary endpoint of the trial was the rate of graft occlusion at 12 months, assessed by coronary computed tomography or coronary angiography. The secondary endpoints were (1) length of postoperative hospital stay; (2) changes in surgical strategy depending upon FFR results (in FFR-guided group only); and (3) rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, i.e., composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any revascularization during the follow-up period. This study is the first prospective randomized trial investigating potential clinical benefits, associated with FFR-guided surgical revascularization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01810224.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary angiography; Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; Fractional flow reserve; Graft patency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027499     DOI: 10.1007/s12265-018-9818-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res        ISSN: 1937-5387            Impact factor:   4.132


  13 in total

1.  Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  William Wijns; Philippe Kolh; Nicolas Danchin; Carlo Di Mario; Volkmar Falk; Thierry Folliguet; Scot Garg; Kurt Huber; Stefan James; Juhani Knuuti; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Jean Marco; Lorenzo Menicanti; Miodrag Ostojic; Massimo F Piepoli; Charles Pirlet; Jose L Pomar; Nicolaus Reifart; Flavio L Ribichini; Martin J Schalij; Paul Sergeant; Patrick W Serruys; Sigmund Silber; Miguel Sousa Uva; David Taggart
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Michalis Hamilos; Olivier Muller; Thomas Cuisset; Argyrios Ntalianis; Gregory Chlouverakis; Giovanna Sarno; Olivier Nelis; Jozef Bartunek; Marc Vanderheyden; Eric Wyffels; Emanuele Barbato; Guy R Heyndrickx; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Fractional flow reserve to guide and to assess coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Mariano Pellicano; Bernard De Bruyne; Gabor G Toth; Filip Casselman; William Wijns; Emanuele Barbato
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Five-Year Outcomes with PCI Guided by Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Panagiotis Xaplanteris; Stephane Fournier; Nico H J Pijls; William F Fearon; Emanuele Barbato; Pim A L Tonino; Thomas Engstrøm; Stefan Kääb; Jan-Henk Dambrink; Gilles Rioufol; Gabor G Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils Witt; Ole Fröbert; Petr Kala; Axel Linke; Nicola Jagic; Martin Mates; Kreton Mavromatis; Habib Samady; Anand Irimpen; Keith Oldroyd; Gianluca Campo; Martina Rothenbühler; Peter Jüni; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography in patients after bypass grafting: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.

Authors:  Annick C Weustink; Koen Nieman; Fransesca Pugliese; Nico R Mollet; W Bob Meijboom; Bob W Meijboom; Carlos van Mieghem; Gert-Jan ten Kate; Filippo Cademartiri; Gabriel P Krestin; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07

7.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Bernard De Bruyne; William F Fearon; Nico H J Pijls; Emanuele Barbato; Pim Tonino; Zsolt Piroth; Nikola Jagic; Sven Mobius-Winckler; Gilles Rioufol; Nils Witt; Petr Kala; Philip MacCarthy; Thomas Engström; Keith Oldroyd; Kreton Mavromatis; Ganesh Manoharan; Peter Verlee; Ole Frobert; Nick Curzen; Jane B Johnson; Andreas Limacher; Eveline Nüesch; Peter Jüni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Lokien X van Nunen; Frederik M Zimmermann; Pim A L Tonino; Emanuele Barbato; Andreas Baumbach; Thomas Engstrøm; Volker Klauss; Philip A MacCarthy; Ganesh Manoharan; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Marcel Van't Veer; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study.

Authors:  Cornelis J Botman; Jacques Schonberger; Sjaak Koolen; Olaf Penn; Hilde Botman; Nabil Dib; Eric Eeckhout; Nico Pijls
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Evolving concepts of angiogram: fractional flow reserve discordances in 4000 coronary stenoses.

Authors:  Gabor Toth; Michalis Hamilos; Stylianos Pyxaras; Fabio Mangiacapra; Olivier Nelis; Frederic De Vroey; Luigi Di Serafino; Olivier Muller; Carlos Van Mieghem; Eric Wyffels; Guy R Heyndrickx; Jozef Bartunek; Marc Vanderheyden; Emanuele Barbato; William Wijns; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.