Literature DB >> 19786633

Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.

Michalis Hamilos1, Olivier Muller, Thomas Cuisset, Argyrios Ntalianis, Gregory Chlouverakis, Giovanna Sarno, Olivier Nelis, Jozef Bartunek, Marc Vanderheyden, Eric Wyffels, Emanuele Barbato, Guy R Heyndrickx, William Wijns, Bernard De Bruyne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Significant left main coronary artery stenosis is an accepted indication for surgical revascularization. The potential of angiography to evaluate the hemodynamic severity of a stenosis is limited. The aims of the present study were to assess the long-term clinical outcome of patients with an angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis in whom the revascularization strategy was based on fractional flow reserve (FFR) and to determine the relationship between quantitative coronary angiography and FFR. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 213 patients with an angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis, FFR measurements and quantitative coronary angiography were performed. When FFR was > or =0.80, patients were treated medically or another stenosis was treated by coronary angioplasty (nonsurgical group; n=138). When FFR was <0.80, coronary artery bypass grafting was performed (surgical group; n=75). The 5-year survival estimates were 89.8% in the nonsurgical group and 85.4% in the surgical group (P=0.48). The 5-year event-free survival estimates were 74.2% and 82.8% in the nonsurgical and surgical groups, respectively (P=0.50). Percent diameter stenosis at quantitative coronary angiography correlated significantly with FFR (r=-0.38, P<0.001), but a very large scatter was observed. In 23% of patients with a diameter stenosis <50%, the left main coronary artery stenosis was hemodynamically significant by FFR.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with equivocal stenosis of the left main coronary artery, angiography alone does not allow appropriate individual decision making about the need for revascularization and often underestimates the functional significance of the stenosis. The favorable outcome of an FFR-guided strategy suggests that FFR should be assessed in such patients before a decision is made "blindly" about the need for revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19786633     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  60 in total

1.  Impact of alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptor blockers on fractional flow reserve and index of microvascular resistance.

Authors:  Emanuele Barbato; Giovanna Sarno; Catalina Trana Berza; Giuseppe Di Gioia; Jozef Bartunek; Marc Vanderheyden; Luigi Di Serafino; William Wijns; Bruno Trimarco; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  The Role of Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Measurements in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Abdul Rahman Ihdayhid; Jin-Sin Koh; John Ramzy; Arnav Kumar; Michael Michail; Adam Brown; Habib Samady
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Myocardial fractional flow reserve. Its role in guiding PCI in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  M Lindstaedt; A Mügge
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  Treating stable ischemic heart disease with percutaneous coronary intervention - The debate continues.

Authors:  Rishi Puri; Stephen J Nicholls
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2012-12

Review 5.  Clinical Application of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Valay Parikh; Kanishk Agnihotri; Sabeeda Kadavath; Nileshkumar J Patel; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Value of FFR in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anil Mehra; Bishav Mohan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-03-14

7.  A physiological approach to refine appropriateness of revascularization, clinical decision making and prognosis in patients with multi vessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Linle Hou; Bobby Ghosh; Abdul Hakeem
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Visual-Functional Mismatch Between Coronary Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Quantitative Coronary Angiography.

Authors:  Morteza Safi; Vahid Eslami; Mohammad Hasan Namazi; Hossain Vakili; Habib Saadat; Saeid Alipourparsa; Ali Adibi; Mohammad Reza Movahed
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-12-31

9.  Fractional flow reserve application in everyday practice: adherence to clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Katia Orvin; Tamir Bental; Alon Eisen; Hana Vaknin-Assa; Abid Assali; Eli I Lev; David Brosh; Ran Kornowski
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-09

10.  Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?

Authors:  T Stiermaier; G Schuler; E Boudriot; S Desch; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.