Literature DB >> 30027409

Detection of in-stent protrusion (ISP) by intravascular ultrasound during carotid stenting: Usefulness of stent-in-stent placement for ISP.

T Okazaki1, S Sakamoto2, K Shinagawa2, N Ichinose2, D Ishii2, T Matsushige2, Y Kiura2, K Kurisu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As in-stent protrusion (ISP) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) may cause postoperative embolism, ISP detection is important. Intravascular ultrasound examination (IVUS) is useful for ISP detection because the blood vessel cross-section can be drawn as a tomogram from the lumen. Our objective was to clarify the occurrence of ISP during CAS using IVUS and relevant factors, and to report the usefulness of stent-in-stent placement when treating ISP.
METHODS: In 142 consecutive patients (128 men, average age 71.7 years; 69 symptomatic) who underwent CAS using dual protection and the blood aspiration method, and subsequent IVUS after stent placement were included. The outcome of CAS, and the occurrence rate of ISP and related factors (plaque characteristics, stent design, intraoperative debris capture rate and postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) positive rate) were examined.
RESULTS: All CAS procedures were successful and no major adverse events (MAEs) were observed at 30 days. ISP was found in 12% (17/142), and stent-in-stent placement was performed in all cases. Vulnerable plaques were observed in 12 of 17 ISP cases (71%). A closed stent was used in 13 of 17 ISP cases (71%). The intraoperative debris capture rate was 100%, and no neurological symptoms were observed in any patients. A significant increase in ISP susceptibility was related to vulnerable plaques and the intraoperative debris capture rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerable plaques and debris capture were significantly correlated with ISP occurrence. In all ISP cases, stent-in-stent placement was performed and good results were obtained. KEY POINTS: • ISP detection during CAS using IVUS is important. • ISP-positive patients were correlated with NASCET ≥ 80%, vulnerable plaques and stent length. • Adequate additional treatment of stent in stenting under reliable protection against ISP-positive patients achieved low perioperative complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid stenosis; Intravascular ultrasound; Stents

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027409     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5636-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting?

Authors:  M Bosiers; G de Donato; K Deloose; J Verbist; P Peeters; F Castriota; A Cremonesi; C Setacci
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 7.069

2.  Intraprocedural plaque protrusion resulting in cerebral embolism during carotid angioplasty with stenting.

Authors:  Hiroshi Aikawa; Tomonobu Kodama; Kouhei Nii; Masanori Tsutsumi; Masanari Onizuka; Minoru Iko; Shuko Matsubara; Housei Etou; Kimiya Sakamoto; Kiyoshi Kazekawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-07-27

3.  Usefulness of dual protection combined with blood aspiration for distal embolic protection during carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Sakamoto; Yoshihiro Kiura; Takahito Okazaki; Katsuhiro Shinagawa; Nobuhiko Ichinose; Masaaki Shibukawa; Yoji Orita; Koji Shimonaga; Yosuke Kajihara; Kaoru Kurisu
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Optical coherence tomography after carotid stenting: rate of stent malapposition, plaque prolapse and fibrous cap rupture according to stent design.

Authors:  G de Donato; F Setacci; P Sirignano; G Galzerano; A Cappelli; C Setacci
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Visualization of internal carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients: a comparison of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  S Yoshimura; M Kawasaki; K Yamada; Y Enomoto; Y Egashira; A Hattori; K Nishigaki; S Minatoguchi; T Iwama
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  High-intensity signal on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography indicates carotid plaques at high risk for cerebral embolism during stenting.

Authors:  Shinichi Yoshimura; Kiyofumi Yamada; Masanori Kawasaki; Takahiko Asano; Masayuki Kanematsu; Manabu Takamatsu; Akira Hara; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Intravascular ultrasound identification of intraluminal embolic plaque material during carotid angioplasty with stenting.

Authors:  J Christopher Wehman; David R Holmes; Robert D Ecker; Eric Sauvageau; John Fahrbach; Ricardo A Hanel; L Nelson Hopkins
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  [Case of internal carotid artery stenosis complicated with shower embolism during filter-protected carotid artery stenting].

Authors:  Kentaro Hayashi; Naoki Kitagawa; Minoru Morikawa; Takeshi Hiu; Yoichi Morofuji; Kazuhiko Suyama; Izumi Nagata
Journal:  Brain Nerve       Date:  2009-01

9.  Carotid angioplasty and stenting: lesion related treatment strategies.

Authors:  Alberto Cremonesi; Carlo Setacci; Raffaella Manetti; Gianmarco de Donato; Francesco Setacci; Guido Balestra; Ignazio Borghesi; Paolo Bianchi; Fausto Castriota
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.534

10.  Plaque protrusion detected by intravascular ultrasound during carotid artery stenting.

Authors:  Norihiko Shinozaki; Nobuhiko Ogata; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.136

View more
  5 in total

1.  Editorial comment: sandwich carotid stenting: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Enrico Romagnoli; Giacomo Frati; Francesco Versaci
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Retrograde three-dimensional rotational angiography: A novel method for the detection of plaque protrusion during carotid artery stenting under continuous distal balloon protection.

Authors:  Hisayuki Hosoo; Wataro Tsuruta; Yusuke Hamada; Masahiro Katsumata; Daiichiro Ishigami; Eiichi Ishikawa; Yuji Matsumaru; Akira Matsumura
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 3.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Diabetes Mellitus and Clinical Outcomes in Carotid Artery Revascularization Using Second-Generation, MicroNet-Covered Stents: Analysis from the PARADIGM Study.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Anna Borratynska; Urszula Gancarczyk; Lukasz Czyz; Martyna Sikorska; Lukasz Tekieli; Bartosz Sobien; Marcin Jakiel; Mariusz Trystula; Tomasz Drazkiewicz; Piotr Podolec; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.061

Review 5.  Mechanically Rotating Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) Transducer: A Review.

Authors:  Jin-Ho Sung; Jin-Ho Chang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.