Literature DB >> 30027353

Percutaneous endoscopic decompression via transforaminal approach for lumbar lateral recess stenosis in geriatric patients.

Xiaoqing Chen1,2, Rongqing Qin1,3, Jie Hao1,2, Cheng Chen1,3, Baiyu Qian1,3, Kai Yang1,3, Feng Zhang4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the surgical strategy, safety, and efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic decompression via transforaminal approach for lumbar lateral recess stenosis in geriatric patients.
METHODS: From January 2012 to June 2014, 25 elderly patients (18 males and 7 females) with symptomatic lumbar lateral recess stenosis were performed percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression. The ages of patients ranged from 70 to 93 years (mean 79.6 years). Clinical outcomes were assessed mainly by leg pain visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI) score, MacNab criteria, and post-operative computerized tomographic (CT) scanning.
RESULTS: The surgery was successfully completed in all patients with an average operation time of 75 minutes (range, 50-110 min). The lumbar CT images at two days after the operation demonstrated distinct enlargement of the foramen intervertebrale as well as satisfactory decompression of the lumbar lateral recess. And 24 patients of the group were followed up for a mean duration of 29 ± six months (range, 12-44 months). The leg pain VAS score decreased from 8.52 ± 1.11 pre-operatively to 1.80 ± 0.63, 1.33 ± 0.89, 1.05 ± 0.69, and 0.71 ± 0.50 at one, three, six and 12 months after the operation, respectively. Besides, the ODI score also dropped from 59.43 ± 10.04 pre-operatively to 29.42 ± 10.33, 20.13 ± 8.18, 13.98 ± 6.16, and 9.86 ± 5.03 at one, three, six and 12 months during the post-operative follow-up period. Statistically significant differences existed in both VAS score and ODI score at each follow-up time point when compared with the pre-operative scores (P < 0.05). The mean reciprocal angulation change of the operated segment in dynamic lumbar lateral view was 3.2° ± 1.6° at the last follow-up. And there were 18 excellent cases, three good cases, and three fair cases according to the MacNab criteria, and the excellent and good rate was 87.5% at 12 months after the operation. There was no aggravation of the coexisting medical conditions after operation in this group. Only 1 case was found complicated with lower extremity numbness, which was recovered by conservative treatment for two weeks. No persistent neurological deficit or soft tissue infection occurred in all patients post-operatively.
CONCLUSIONS: We considered that percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression achieved satisfactory results and provided a safe, effective, and less invasive alternative for treating lumbar lateral recess stenosis in geriatric patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geriatric; Lumbar lateral recess stenosis; Percutaneous endoscopic decompression; Transforaminal approach

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027353     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4051-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Lumbar root compression in the lateral recess: MR imaging, conventional myelography, and CT myelography comparison with surgical confirmation.

Authors:  Walter S Bartynski; Luke Lin
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Advances in endoscopic disc and spine surgery: foraminal approach.

Authors:  Anthony T Yeung; Christopher A Yeung
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2003

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Yong Ahn
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a translaminar approach, especially for soft, highly down-migrated lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Jianwei Du; Xiangyu Tang; Xin Jing; Ningdao Li; Yan Wang; Xifeng Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients.

Authors:  I Macnab
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Clemens Weber; Charalampis Giannadakis; Vidar Rao; Asgeir S Jakola; Ulf Nerland; Øystein P Nygaard; Tore K Solberg; Sasha Gulati; Ole Solheim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A retrospective evaluation of the clinical success of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with foraminotomy in geriatric patients.

Authors:  Gabriele P Jasper; Gina M Francisco; Albert E Telfeian
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  [Lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients].

Authors:  P Pulido-Rivas; R G Sola; J M Pallares-Fernández; A Pintor-Escobar
Journal:  Rev Neurol       Date:  2004 Sep 16-30       Impact factor: 0.870

9.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar surgery for adjacent segment degeneration and recurrent disc herniation.

Authors:  Huan-Chieh Chen; Chih-Hsun Lee; Li Wei; Tai-Ngar Lui; Tien-Jen Lin
Journal:  Neurol Res Int       Date:  2015-03-10

Review 10.  Transforaminal endoscopic surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniations: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jorm Nellensteijn; Raymond Ostelo; Ronald Bartels; Wilco Peul; Barend van Royen; Maurits van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  5 in total

1.  Difficulties, Challenges, and the Learning Curve of Avoiding Complications in Lumbar Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Albert E Telfeian; Stefan Hellinger; Max R F Ramos; Hyeun Sung Kim; Daniel W Hanson; Nimar Salari; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

2.  The Role of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Surgery in Lateral Recess Stenosis in Elderly Patients.

Authors:  Stylianos Kapetanakis; Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis; Tryfon Thomaidis; Georgios Charitoudis; Panagiotis Theodosiadis
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-03-26

Review 3.  An Algorithmic Approach to Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Evidenced-Based Approach.

Authors:  Sudhir Diwan; Dawood Sayed; Timothy R Deer; Amber Salomons; Kevin Liang
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.750

4.  Clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic lateral recess decompression by using the visualized drilled foraminoplasty and visualized reamed foraminoplasty: a comparison study.

Authors:  Boyu Wu; Chengjie Xiong; Biwang Huang; Dongdong Zhao; Zhipeng Yao; Yawei Yao; Feng Xu; Hui Kang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Comparison of Effects of PELD and Fenestration in the Treatment of Geriatric Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis.

Authors:  Zhendong Lv; Linyu Jin; Kun Wang; Zhi Chen; Fengning Li; Yuhui Zhang; Lifeng Lao; Chun Zhou; Xinfeng Li; Hongxing Shen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.458

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.