| Literature DB >> 30027037 |
Heng Liu1,2, Chengchao Chu2, Yu Liu2,3, Xin Pang2, Yayun Wu2, Zijian Zhou2,4, Pengfei Zhang2, Weiguo Zhang1,5, Gang Liu2,6,7, Xiaoyuan Chen4.
Abstract
While magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents have potential in noninvasive image-guided tumor treatment, further developments are needed to increase contrast, biodegradability, and safety. Here, novel engineered manganese-eumelanin coordination nanocomposites (MnEMNPs) are developed via a facile one-pot intrapolymerization doping (IPD) approach in aqueous solution, through simple chemical oxidation-polymerization of the 3,4-dihydroxy-DL-phenylalanine precursor with potassium permanganate serving as the Mn source and an oxidant. The resulting MnEMNPs possess ultrahigh longitudinal relaxivity (r1 value up to 60.8 mM-1 s-1 at 1.5 T) attributed to the high manganese doping efficiency (>10%) and geometrically confined conformation. Due to their high manganese chelation stability, excellent biocompatibility, and strong near-infrared absorption, high-performance longitudinal-transverse (T1-T2) dual-modal magnetic resonance/photoacoustic imaging and photothermal tumor ablation are achieved. Furthermore, the hydrogen peroxide-triggered decomposition behavior of MnEMNPs circumvents the poor biodegradation issue of many nanomaterials. This facile, convenient, economical, and efficient IPD strategy will open up new avenues for the development of high-performance multifunctional theranostic nanoplatforms in bionanomedicine.Entities:
Keywords: eumelanin; geometrical confinement; magnetic resonance imaging; manganese; theranostics
Year: 2018 PMID: 30027037 PMCID: PMC6051206 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Scheme 1Synthesis procedure and theranostic applications of MnEMNPs. The DL‐DOPA precursor self‐polymerizes into MnEMNPs via a one‐pot IPD strategy. The KMnO4 serves as the Mn source and an oxidant concurrently. Mn ions with more than one coordinating water molecule (q) are abundantly incorporated into MnEMNPs. The conformation of MnEMNPs creates a geometrically confined space resulting in prolonged τR and τD. These contributors enhance the T 1 contrast of MnEMNPs. The as‐obtained MnEMNPs were explored for T 1 –T 2 dual‐modal MRI/PAI and tumor PTT.
Figure 1Characterization of MnEMNPs. a) TEM images. Scale bars: 100 nm (left) and 20 nm (right). The inset shows digital photograph of MnEMNPs aqueous solution. b) ESR spectra. c) Raman spectrum. d) SEM images and corresponding elemental mapping images (C, O, and Mn). Scale bar, 5 µm. e) Mn2p1/2 and Mn2p3/2 XPS spectra. f) Mn stability inside MnEMNPs, determined by ICP‐MS.
Figure 2Magnetic/photoacoustic/photothermal performance of MnEMNPs. a) M‐H curve at 300 K. b,c) 1H NMRD profiles. d) T 1WI and T 2WI at various MFs. The linear relationship for the e) r 1 and f) r 2 relaxivities of MnEMNPs as a function of Mn concentration at various MFs. g) PA signal intensity under 800 nm as a function of the concentration of MnEMNPs. The insets show corresponding PA images of MnEMNPs solution. h) Temperature elevation of MnEMNP solutions with various concentrations during 2 W cm−2 laser irradiation. i) Photothermal heating curves of 100 µg mL−1 MnEMNPs under 2 W cm−2 laser irradiation over five laser on/off cycles.
Figure 3PEGylation and H2O2‐responsive decomposition behavior of NPs. a) UV–vis absorption spectra, b) hydrodynamic size, c) zeta potential, and d) FT‐IR spectra. e) UV–vis absorption spectra of PMnEMNPs dispersed in various media for 24 h. The inset shows corresponding absorbance at 808 nm. f) Hemolysis analysis. g) TEM images showing the structural evolution of PMnEMNPs in the presence of H2O2 for 24 h. Scale bar, 200 nm. The insets show corresponding digital photographs.
Figure 4In vitro cellular uptake and theranostic results of PMnEMNPs. a) Representative optical microscope and b) TEM images of U87MG cells incubated without (upper row) or with (lower row) PMnEMNPs. Scale bars: 100 and 50 µm for panel (a), 2 and 1 µm for panel (b), respectively. c) Quantitative cellular uptake of PMnEMNPs by ICP‐MS analysis. d) PA signal intensities of U87MG cells after incubation with different concentrations of PMnEMNPs. The insets show corresponding PA images. Normalized e) T 1 and f) T 2 relaxation times of U87MG cells after incubation with different concentrations of PMnEMNPs. The insets in panels (e) and (f) show corresponding T 1WI and T 2WI, respectively. The viability of U87MG cells after g) incubation with different concentrations of PMnEMNPs and h) exposed to PMnEMNPs plus 2 W cm−2 laser irradiation for 5 min. i) Calcein‐AM/PI co‐stained fluorescence images of U87MG cells that received different treatments.
Figure 5In vivo theranostic evaluation of PMnEMNPs. a) In vivo T 1WI and T 2WI, b) normalized T 1, and c) T 2 relaxation times of U87MG tumor‐bearing mouse prior to and at different time points postinjection of PMnEMNPs. d) PA images and e) corresponding normalized PA signal intensity from the tumor at different time points. f) Tumor growth curves and g) body weight of mice from different treatment groups.