Mahdi Abbasi1, Afrooz Nakhostin2, Fatemeh Namdar3, Nasim Chiniforush4, Masomeh Hasani Tabatabaei5. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran. 3. Dental Materials Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. 4. PhD candidate of laser dentistry, Laser Research Center of Dentistry (LRCD), School of dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Introduction: The present in vitro study evaluated the recurrence rate of caries following cavity preparations with bur (conventional technique) and irradiation by Erbium:Yttrium- Aluminum-Garnet (Er:YAG) laser through micro hardness test. Methods: A total of 72 human extracted molars were randomly divided into 3 groups and class 5 cavities were prepared on them with 3 different methods: G1) conventional bur, G2) Er:YAG laser irradiation alone and G3) laser irradiation + laser treatment. The specimens were immersed in the artificial caries solution with pH of 2.0 and 5.0 (12 days) and then immersed in re-mineralizing solution with pH of 7.0 (25 days). The specimens were longitudinally sectioned and their Vickers micro hardness was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by means of three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple comparisons tests. Results: The micro hardness of the samples was affected by substrate type (enamel and dentin) and low values were achieved in dentin (P<0.001). Moreover, no significant difference was observed between preparation methods by bar and laser irradiation alone (P ≤0.499). Although laser irradiation + laser treatment decreased micro hardness of enamel compared to other methods. In dentin samples, different methods of preparation showed no significant effect on micro hardness (P ≤0.874). Conclusion: Due to the similar values of micro hardness following G1 and G2, it seems that Er:YAG laser alone is as much effective as the conventional bur to prevent recurrence caries. However, because of the high prices of laser instruments, bur preparations can be done commonly.
Introduction: The present in vitro study evaluated the recurrence rate of caries following cavity preparations with bur (conventional technique) and irradiation by Erbium:Yttrium- Aluminum-Garnet (Er:YAG) laser through micro hardness test. Methods: A total of 72 human extracted molars were randomly divided into 3 groups and class 5 cavities were prepared on them with 3 different methods: G1) conventional bur, G2) Er:YAG laser irradiation alone and G3) laser irradiation + laser treatment. The specimens were immersed in the artificial caries solution with pH of 2.0 and 5.0 (12 days) and then immersed in re-mineralizing solution with pH of 7.0 (25 days). The specimens were longitudinally sectioned and their Vickers micro hardness was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by means of three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple comparisons tests. Results: The micro hardness of the samples was affected by substrate type (enamel and dentin) and low values were achieved in dentin (P<0.001). Moreover, no significant difference was observed between preparation methods by bar and laser irradiation alone (P ≤0.499). Although laser irradiation + laser treatment decreased micro hardness of enamel compared to other methods. In dentin samples, different methods of preparation showed no significant effect on micro hardness (P ≤0.874). Conclusion: Due to the similar values of micro hardness following G1 and G2, it seems that Er:YAG laser alone is as much effective as the conventional bur to prevent recurrence caries. However, because of the high prices of laser instruments, bur preparations can be done commonly.
Authors: Pauli T Mattila; Mirka C Niskanen; Miira M Vehkalahti; Anne Nordblad; Matti L E Knuuttila Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 8.728