| Literature DB >> 30026789 |
Pradeepa C G Bandaranayake1,2, John I Yoder2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rhizobium rhizogenes transformation is commonly used to generate transgenic roots traditionally called hairy roots, for both investigative and commercial applications. While fertile plants can be regenerated from transgenic roots, the transgenic roots are more typically used directly, either to investigate root biology or to produce valuable secondary metabolites. Hairy roots have been particularly useful for genetic studies of rhizosphere interactions; including the recognition of host plant roots by the roots of parasitic angiosperms.Entities:
Keywords: Hairy roots; Orobanchaceae; Parasitic plants; Rhizobium rhizogenes; Root transformation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30026789 PMCID: PMC6048883 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-018-0327-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Effects of medium, solidifying agent and co-incubation on Triphysaria root transformation
| Medium | Solidifying agent | Co-incubation period | % of YFP calli (after 4 weeks) | % Transformation (after 8 weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | Phytagel | 1 week | 36.8±5 | 24.4±1 |
| 2 weeks | 75.9±12 | 70.0±10 | ||
| Phyto agar | 1 week | 23.9±2 | 19.1±2 | |
| 2 weeks | 49.4±8 | 41.7±9 | ||
| Hoagland | Phytagel | 1 week | 14.0±5 | 8.4±3 |
| 2 weeks | 12.2±2 | 8.7±2 | ||
| Phyto agar | 1 week | 8.6±1 | 6.2±2 | |
| 2 weeks | 7.6±1 | 4.8±2 | ||
| Medium (M) Pr > F | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ||
| Solidifying agent (S) Pr > F | < 0.0001 | 0.0002 | ||
| Duration (D) Pr > F | < .00001 | < 0.0001 | ||
| S*D Pr > F | 0.0495 | < 0.0088 | ||
| M*S Pr > F | 0.0014 | < 0.0043 | ||
| M*D Pr > F | < 0.0001 | < 0.0001 | ||
| M*S*D Pr > F | 0.0358 | 0.0209 |
Each treatment consisted of five plates (each plate is a technical replicate) and the experiments were conducted three times (biological replicates). The efficiency values represent the average ± SD (n = 15)
Effects of biological and environmental parameters on Triphysaria root transformation
| Parameter tested | Levels | Transformation efficiency | Statistics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar content in the medium | 0% | 2.26 ± 0.8c | Pr > F < 0.0001 |
| 0.5% | 11.74 ± 5.0bc | ||
| 1% | 20.84 ± 5.3b | ||
| 3% | 73.93 ± 9.0a | ||
| 4% | 74.07 ± 6.0a | ||
| Age of the seedling | 5 days | 67.91 ± 4.1a | Pr > F < 0.0013 |
| 10 days | 54.18 ± 2.4b | ||
| 15 days | 37.31 ± 8.1c | ||
| Acetosyringone | 0 | 3.25 ± 0.9c | Pr > F < 0.0001 |
| 200 uM | 21.74 ± 4.5b | n = 366–376 | |
| 400 uM | 65.03 ± 6.4a | ||
| Days kept in the co-incubation plate | 7 days | 33.21 ± 8.5c | Pr > F < 0.0008 |
| 14 days | 68.33 ± 4.2a | ||
| 21 days | 61.26 ± 4.1a | ||
| Explant type | Hypocotyl | 67.20 ± 2.8a | Pr > |t| < 0.0001 |
| Root tip | 0.76 ± 0.8b | ||
| Illumination during co-incubation | Light | 67.53 ± 6.7a | Pr > |t| < 0.0001 |
| Dark | 12.46 ± 2.6b |
Each treatment consisted of three plates (each plate is a technical replicate) and the experiments were conducted three times (biological replicates). The efficiency values represent the average ± SD (n = 09). Mean transformation efficiency, of a parameter tested, represented by different letters are significantly different at the P value given
Effects of culture medium on Triphysaria transformation and subsequent root growth
| Measurement | Medium | Statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25X Hoagland | MS | ||
| % of YFP calli | 73.26 ± 3.1a | 75.21 ± 4.1a | Pr > |t| 0.5482 |
| Transformation efficiency % | 64.66 ± 4.4a | 17.86 ± 9.3b | Pr > |t| 0.0014 |
| Total number of roots | 7.50 ± 0.3a | 3.20 ± 0.1b | Pr > |t| < 0.0001 |
| Number of YFP roots | 2.00 ± 0.3a | 0.25 ± 0.1b | Pr > |t| 0.0005 |
| % of YFP roots | 29.08 ± 4.8a | 5.60 ± 1.6b | Pr > |t| 0.0013 |
| Root length | 2.67 ± 0.3a | 1.91 ± 0.1b | Pr > |t| 0.0117 |
Each treatment consisted of three plates (each plate is a technical replicate) and the experiments were conducted three times (biological replicates). The efficiency values represent the average ± SD (n = 09). Mean transformation efficiency, of a measurement, represented by different letters are significantly different at the P value given
Effects of temperature on transformation and subsequent growth of Triphysaria roots
| Measurement | Time at 16 °C | Statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 weeks at 16 °C + 6 weeks in 25 °C | 8 weeks at 16 °C | ||
| Transformation efficiency (%) | 28.25 ± 13.9b | 62.36 ± 4.0a | Pr > |t| 0.0149 |
| Total number of roots | 13.23 ± 09a | 6.87 ± 0.7b | Pr > |t| 0.0006 |
| Number of YFP roots | 1.15 ± 0.0a | 1.52 ± 0.2a | Pr > |t| 0.1355 |
| % YFP roots | 9.81 ± 0.8b | 24.58 ± 2.9a | Pr > |t| 0.0011 |
| Length of YFP roots (cm) | 3.30 ± 0.1a | 2.31 ± 0.1b | Pr > |t| 0.0005 |
Each treatment consisted of three plates (each plate is a technical replicate) and the experiments were conducted three times (biological replicates). The efficiency values represent the average ± SD (n = 09). Mean transformation efficiency, of a measurement, represented by different letters are significantly different at the P value given
Fig. 2Effects of seedling age on Arabidopsis transformation efficiency, Each value represents mean ± SD of three transformation experiments each with 3 technical replicates. Values represented by different letters are significantly different (Pr > F = < 0.0001)
Effect of temperature and co-incubation period on Arabidopsis root transformation
| Duration in co-transformation plate (days) | Growth temperature (°C) | Transformation efficiency (Mean ± SD) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 25 | 72.05 ± 5.7a |
| 16 | 14.86 ± 3.4b | |
| 6 | 25 | 32.82 ± 9.2a |
| 16 | 6.40 ± 0.9b | |
| 9 | 25 | 13.56 ± 4.4a |
| 16 | 3.29 ± 1.5b | |
| 12 | 25 | 2.50 ± 2.4a |
| 16 | 0.49 ± 0.3a | |
| Duration in 16 °C Pr > F 0.0001 | ||
| Growth temperature (°C) Pr > F 0.0001 | ||
| Duration in 16 °C * Growth temperature(°C) Pr > F 0.0001 | ||
Each treatment consisted of five plates (each plate is a technical replicate) and the experiments were conducted three times (biological replicates). The efficiency values represent the average ± SD (n = 09). Significantly different transformation efficiencies are represented by different letters
Fig. 1Rhizobium rhizogenes mediated root transformation of Triphysaria and Arabidopsis, a, c, e, g, i, k, m, o images under YFP florescence, b, d, f, h, j, l, n, p images under white light, a, b Triphysaria 0, 5, 14 and 60 days after inoculation with R. rhizogenes, c, d Triphysaria callus development 14 days after inoculation, e, f Triphysaria callus development 60 days after inoculation, g, h Overview of plate containing Triphysaria 60 days after inoculation, i, j Arabidopsis callus development 7 days after inoculation, k, l Arabidopsis callus development 14 days after inoculation, m, n overview of plate containing Arabidopsis 21 days after inoculation, o, p Arabidopsis 7, 14 and 21 days after inoculation
Fig. 3Confirmation of R. rhizogenes Ri plasmid integration in YFP expressing T. versicolor and A. thaliana roots. Primers for rolB, rolC, virD2, TvQR1 and AtActin were used in PCR reactions using cDNA from transgenic (T) or non-transformed (Wt) roots. MSU is genomic DNA from MSU440 and M is the 1 Kb+ DNA ladder. The cDNA from wild type roots and genomic DNA from R. rhizogenes MSU440 were used as negative and positive controls. T. versicolor TvQR1 gene and A. thaliana Actin gene were used as a positive control for amplification plant cDNA. The rolB and rolC genes were amplified from hairy root cDNA. The virD2, an R. rhizogenes gene present on the Ri plasmid but not inserted into the plant genome, was amplified from YFP expressing roots