Literature DB >> 30025028

Applications of Machine Learning Methods to Genomic Selection in Breeding Wheat for Rust Resistance.

Juan Manuel González-Camacho, Leonardo Ornella, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, Daniel Gianola, Susanne Dreisigacker, José Crossa.   

Abstract

New methods and algorithms are being developed for predicting untested phenotypes in schemes commonly used in genomic selection (GS). The prediction of disease resistance in GS has its own peculiarities: a) there is consensus about the additive nature of quantitative adult plant resistance (APR) genes, although epistasis has been found in some populations; b) rust resistance requires effective combinations of major and minor genes; and c) disease resistance is commonly measured based on ordinal scales (e.g., scales from 1-5, 1-9, etc.). Machine learning (ML) is a field of computer science that uses algorithms and existing samples to capture characteristics of target patterns. In this paper we discuss several state-of-the-art ML methods that could be applied in GS. Many of them have already been used to predict rust resistance in wheat. Others are very appealing, given their performance for predicting other wheat traits with similar characteristics. We briefly describe the proposed methods in the Appendix.
Copyright © 2018 Crop Science Society of America.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30025028     DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2017.11.0104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Genome        ISSN: 1940-3372            Impact factor:   4.089


  14 in total

1.  Genome-wide association mapping and genomic prediction of yield-related traits and starch pasting properties in cassava.

Authors:  Chalermpol Phumichai; Pornsak Aiemnaka; Piyaporn Nathaisong; Sirikan Hunsawattanakul; Phasakorn Fungfoo; Chareinsuk Rojanaridpiched; Vichan Vichukit; Pasajee Kongsil; Piya Kittipadakul; Wannasiri Wannarat; Julapark Chunwongse; Pumipat Tongyoo; Chookiat Kijkhunasatian; Sunee Chotineeranat; Kuakoon Piyachomkwan; Marnin D Wolfe; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Using machine learning to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction of reproduction traits in pigs.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Shaolei Shi; Guijiang Wang; Wenxue Luo; Xia Wei; Ao Qiu; Fei Luo; Xiangdong Ding
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Performance prediction of crosses in plant breeding through genotype by environment interactions.

Authors:  Javad Ansarifar; Faezeh Akhavizadegan; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Predicting yield performance of parents in plant breeding: A neural collaborative filtering approach.

Authors:  Saeed Khaki; Zahra Khalilzadeh; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Benchmarking Parametric and Machine Learning Models for Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits.

Authors:  Christina B Azodi; Emily Bolger; Andrew McCarren; Mark Roantree; Gustavo de Los Campos; Shin-Han Shiu
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  The look ahead trace back optimizer for genomic selection under transparent and opaque simulators.

Authors:  Fatemeh Amini; Felipe Restrepo Franco; Guiping Hu; Lizhi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Applications of Support Vector Machine in Genomic Prediction in Pig and Maize Populations.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Xueshuang Lai; Dengying Liu; Zhenyang Zhang; Peipei Ma; Qishan Wang; Zhe Zhang; Yuchun Pan
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Assessment and Establishment of Correlation between Reactive Oxidation Species, Citric Acid, and Fructose Level in Infertile Male Individuals: A Machine-Learning Approach.

Authors:  Golnaz Shemshaki; Ashitha S Niranjana Murthy; Suttur S Malini
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-06-28

9.  Genomic Predictive Ability for Foliar Nutritive Traits in Perennial Ryegrass.

Authors:  Sai Krishna Arojju; Mingshu Cao; M Z Zulfi Jahufer; Brent A Barrett; Marty J Faville
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  How Machine Learning Methods Helped Find Putative Rye Wax Genes Among GBS Data.

Authors:  Magdalena Góralska; Jan Bińkowski; Natalia Lenarczyk; Anna Bienias; Agnieszka Grądzielewska; Ilona Czyczyło-Mysza; Kamila Kapłoniak; Stefan Stojałowski; Beata Myśków
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.