| Literature DB >> 30024560 |
Yu Wang1, Chao Gu, Yongjun Huo, Weiwei Han, Jinfen Yu, Chengzong Ding, Xiuyu Zhao, Yunfang Meng, Chuanting Li.
Abstract
To explore the feasibility of using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the diagnosis of anal fistula and evaluating its activity.Thirty-four patients with perianal fistulas were examined with DTI on a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before undergoing surgery. Based on the surgery requirement and preoperative examinations, the lesions fell into 2 groups: the positive inflammation activity (PIA) group and the negative inflammation activity (NIA) group. Each lesion was divided into 3 regions of interest (ROIs) (i.e., the fistula area, edema area, and distant normal-appearing area). Fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were calculated and analyzed.There were statistically significant differences in FA and ADC values of the fistula area, edema area, and distant normal-appearing area. The FA values of the fistula area, edema area, and distant normal-appearing area in PIA were 0.134 ± 0.046, 0.225 ± 0.060, 0.343 ± 0.070, respectively. The ADC values (×10 mm/s) of the fistula area, edema area, and distant normal-appearing area in PIA were 0.979 ± 0.441, 1.542 ± 0.274, 1.864 ± 0.336, respectively. The FA values of the fistula area, edema area, and distant normal-appearing area in NIA were 0.183 ± 0.057, 0.286 ± 0.059, 0.382 ± 0.084, respectively. The ADC values (×10 mm/s) of the fistula area, edema area, and distant normal-appearing area in NIA were 1.393 ± 0.256, 1.518 ± 0.274, 1.703 ± 0.432, respectively. Regarding the activity, the FA and ADC values of the PIA group were lower than those of the NIA group in the fistula area, and the differences were statistically significant (P = .009, .004). The FA values of the edema area in the PIA group were lower than those in the NIA group, and the difference was statistically significant. The ADC values of the edema area, and both the FA and ADC values of the distant normal-appearing area all exhibited no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups.DTI parameters may reflect microstructures of perianal fiatulas via quantitative information. FA and ADC values were instrumental in evaluating the activity of perianal fistulas.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30024560 PMCID: PMC6086465 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Classification of fistulas according to the Parks system.
Magnetic resonance signal.
Figure 1A 39-year-old man with subcutaneous anal fistula of negative inflammation activity. (A) Axial T2-weighted image shows a perianal fistula (arrow) that exhibits equal and slightly high signal intensity. (B and C) Axial and sagittal fat-suppression T2-weighted images show a perianal fistula (arrow) that exhibits high signal intensity. (D) Axial diffusion tensor imaging reveals high signal intensity at the fistula (arrow). (E) Axial apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows a value of 1.149 × 10−3 mm2/s for the fistula. (F) Axial fractional anisotropy (FA) map shows a value of 0.13.
Figure 2A 34-year-old man with transsphinteric anal fistula of positive inflammation activity with abscess. (A) Axial T2-weighted image shows a perianal fistula (arrow) that exhibits slightly high signal intensity. (B and C) Axial and sagittal fat-suppression T2-weighted images show a perianal fistula (arrow) that exhibits high signal intensity. (D) Axial diffusion tensor imaging reveals high signal intensity at the fistula (arrow). (E) Axial apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map shows a value of 0.377 × 10−3 mm2/s for the fistula. (F) Axial fractional anisotropy (FA) map shows a value of 0.073.
The diffusion tensor imaging parameter values of each lesion area.
Variables of receiver-operating characteristic analysis for the 2 parameters analyzed for the differential diagnosis of negative inflammation activity and positive inflammation activity.
Figure 3The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of 2 parameters for the diagnosis of abscess area in perianal fistulas, respectively, in the PIA and NIA group: the area under the ROC curve (AUC) below the black dotted line is <0.5. The AUC of ADC is bigger than that of FA, the ADC value is more sensitive than FA, however, FA value is more specific.
Figure 4The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of 2 parameters for the diagnosis of edema area in perianal fistulas, respectively, in the PIA and NIA group: the area under the ROC curve (AUC) below the black dotted line is <0.5. The AUC of FA is bigger than that of ADC, however, the ADC value has no statistical significance. The FA value is more sensitive.