Literature DB >> 19217086

Too much control can hurt: a threaded cognition model of the attentional blink.

Niels A Taatgen1, Ion Juvina, Marc Schipper, Jelmer P Borst, Sander Martens.   

Abstract

Explanations for the attentional blink (AB; a deficit in identifying the second of two targets when presented 200-500 ms after the first) have recently shifted from limitations in memory consolidation to disruptions in cognitive control. With a new model based on the threaded cognition theory of multi-tasking we propose a different explanation: the AB is produced by an overexertion of control. This overexertion is produced by a production rule that blocks target detection during memory consolidation. In addition to fitting many known effects in the literature, the model predicts that adding certain secondary tasks will decrease the AB. In Experiment 1, a secondary task is added to the AB task in which participants have to respond to a moving dot. As predicted, AB decreases. Experiment 2 expands this result by controlling for learning, and adds a second variation, rotating the first target. For this variation the model predicts an increase in AB, which is indeed what we found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19217086     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  65 in total

1.  PET evidence for a role for striatal dopamine in the attentional blink: functional implications.

Authors:  Heleen A Slagter; Rachel Tomer; Bradley T Christian; Andrew S Fox; Lorenza S Colzato; Carlye R King; Dhanabalan Murali; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Sparing from the attentional blink is not spared from structural limitations.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P E Dux; B Wyble; P Jolicœur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

3.  Resetting capacity limitations revealed by long-lasting elimination of attentional blink through training.

Authors:  Hoon Choi; Li-Hung Chang; Kazuhisa Shibata; Yuka Sasaki; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Personality predicts temporal attention costs in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Mary H Maclean; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

Review 5.  Stroop and picture-word interference are two sides of the same coin.

Authors:  Leendert van Maanen; Hedderik van Rijn; Jelmer P Borst
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

6.  On the interplay between working memory consolidation and attentional selection in controlling conscious access: parallel processing at a cost--a comment on 'The interplay of attention and consciousness in visual search, attentional blink and working memory consolidation'.

Authors:  Brad Wyble; Howard Bowman; Mark Nieuwenstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Perceptual similarity induces overinvestment in an attentional blink task.

Authors:  Ellen MacLellan; David I Shore; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-07-28

8.  Sleep after practice reduces the attentional blink.

Authors:  Nicola Cellini; Patrick T Goodbourn; Elizabeth A McDevitt; Paolo Martini; Alex O Holcombe; Sara C Mednick
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Attentional blink and impulsiveness: evidence for higher functional impulsivity in non-blinkers compared to blinkers.

Authors:  Stefan J Troche; Thomas H Rammsayer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous cueing in multi-stream RSVP: implications for theories of attentional blink.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Liping Shao; Xiaolin Zhou; Sander Martens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.