Literature DB >> 30023790

Facile and Green Synthesis of Multicolor Fluorescence Carbon Dots from Curcumin: In Vitro and in Vivo Bioimaging and Other Applications.

Tathagata Pal1, Shanid Mohiyuddin1, Gopinath Packirisamy1.   

Abstract

Early detection is the critical phase in the prognostic strategy of various life-threatening maladies like infectious diseases and cancer. The mortality rate caused by these diseases could be considerably reduced if they were diagnosed in the early stages of disease development. Carbon dots (C-dots), a relatively new and promising candidate in the fluorescent nanomaterial category, possess a perceptible impact on various bioapplications. Herein, we report a one-step facile hydrothermal synthesis that yields a novel surface-passivated carbon dot (CDP) from curcumin (as a green substrate) displaying high aqueous solubility. The physico-chemical characterization of thus synthesized C-dots was accomplished by an UV-visible spectrophotometer, fluorescence spectrophotometer, zetasizer, TEM, and FE-SEM to understand the formation of carbon dots with a 4-5 nm size near spherical nanoparticle with high colloidal stability. E. coli DH5α was engaged as the Gram-negative test organism and S. aureus as the Gram-positive in the biolabeling of bacteria. Cancer cell lines including colon cancer (HCT-15), lung cancer (A549), and mouse fibroblast (NIH 3T3) were evaluated and resulted in good biolabeling potential and less cytotoxicity. Zebrafish (ASWT) embryos as an animal model system were bioimaged, and in vivo toxicity was inferred. Moreover, the synthesized C-dots were shown to have free radical scavenging activity in a dose-dependent manner. The unpassivated C-dots (CD) were found to sense ferric ions at the micromolar concentration level. The findings of our study suggest that the multifunctional potentiality of CDPs serves as high-performance optical nanoprobes and can be a suitable alternative for various biolabeling and contrasting agents.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30023790      PMCID: PMC6044881          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

In recent days, nanotechnology has extended its nonavoiding potential influence in the fields of basic science to prototype application. Basically, nanotechnology deals with materials at the nanoscale level owing to vast tailoring possibilities, resulting in different composition size and shape of materials. The nanometer size enables them with unique properties which can further be modified according to required applications.[1] Luminescent carbon dots (C-dots) are comparatively new additions to this field, showing enormous applications in health, energy, and environment. Although it shares similarities with quantum dots, it has the advantage of being nontoxic as compared to the heavy-metal-based quantum dots. After its discovery in 2006, it has gained the massive attention of research groups in the field of bioanalytics as well as bioimaging due to its efficient fluorescent property[2] and high biocompatibility.[3] C-dots are basically carbon nanoparticles with size below 10 nm. The prepared C-dots show the chemical composition of nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen and other basic elements with respect to the substrate of preparation. Synthesis of C-dots is made possible in multiple ways including arc discharge, laser ablation, electrochemical, hydrothermal, ultrasonic, microwave, and solvothermal processes. Hydrothermal synthesis is the best among them, forming high quantum yield C-dots with the advances in controlling the size, composition, purity, energy and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, thus synthesized C-dots can evade the phase transition from mesophase to substable phase. The basis of fluorescence property in carbon dots is still unknown. Mechanistically, the excitation-dependent emission behaviours of C-dots might be due to the various surface defects caused during the synthesis, leading to various energy traps. The activation of different surface energy traps results in different fluorescence properties. More interestingly, the fluorescence from the C-dots can be quenched efficiently by electron donor or acceptor molecules in the solution which can make it a good agent for metal ion sensing. C-dots can be passivated by various functional groups to cover the carbon core of the C-dots for increasing the quantum yield (QY), better chemical stability, and maximum aqueous solubility. C-dots with emission in the near-infrared (NIR) spectral region can also be used in biobased applications of nanobiotechnology. NIR emission of C-dots is very significant since the body tissues are transparent in the NIR water window. The theranostic potential of C-dots gives the opportunity for biolabeling, and thereby early diagnosis and management of diseases by loading therapeutic medicine[4] enables a speedy recovery. C-dots possess better biocompatibility, in vivo stability, fewer side effects, low cost of production, and control of intellectual property rights for the successful theranostic implication. One similarity of most of the carbohydrate-based C-dots is that the diffraction peak shows amorphous nature between 2θ = 18–24 °C.[5−7] C-dots stay in the amorphous stage with lattice spacing closely resembling graphitic and turbostratic carbon. To synthesize C-dots various carbon sources were reported like lamp soot,[8] food caramels,[9] soya milk,[10] orange juice,[11] eggshell,[12] protein (bovine serum albumin),[13] and watermelon.[14] However, scaling up the synthesis procedure is still a challenging task. Curcumin is the principle compound found in Curcuma longa (commonly known as turmeric) giving a yellow color to the turmeric. It can exist in several tautomeric forms including a 1,3-diketo form and two equivalent enol forms. The enol form is more energetically stable in the solid form and in solution. Curcumin has antioxidants, anticancerous, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, and antifungal activity along with metal sensing properties. However, poor aqueous solubility leading to very low bioavailability delimits its efficiency as a potential agent for application in diverse fields. There are no reports dealing with the solubility issue of the curcumin despite of its huge potentials in applications. However, the formation of carbon dot from the curcumin brings about enhanced aqueous solubility and can cross over the delimiting factor. The successful synthesis of highly green fluorescent carbon dots surface passivated with oligoethyleneamine (OEI) resulted in enhanced biocompatibility and can be used as potential nanoprobes for biomedical application.[15] Herein, we are reporting for the first time the synthesis of carbon dots from curcumin and surface passivated with branched PEI (bPEI) giving rise to increased quantum yield (QY), better chemical stability, and enhanced aqueous soluble C-dots. These as-synthesized C-dots were used as a potential biolabeling agent along with antioxidation and metal ion sensing properties.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of Synthesized CDP and C-Dots

The color of CDP and CD was brown and pale yellow under visible light and ocean green and bright blue under UV light, respectively, as shown in Figure A. In UV–vis analysis the CD shows two absorption bands at 265 nm (π–π* transition) and 345 nm (n−π* transition) as in Figure C, whereas CDP portrays two absorption bands at 275 nm (π–π* transition) and 340 nm (n−π* transition) as demonstrated in Figure D. The absorbance of CDP increases from the 265 to 275 nm onset of the surface passivation. The fluorescence spectroscopic study revealed that the maximum fluorescence emission intensity of CD was due to excitation at 280 nm, and for CDP it was 340 nm (Figure S1). Since PEI is a well-known precursor for the carbon dot synthesis as well as surface passivation agent resulting in high biocompatible excellent fluorescent carbon dots,[16] we underwent comparative analysis of the fluorescence activity of carbon dots prepared from the curcumin alone (CD), PEI alone, and PEI passivated curcumin (CDP) carbon dots. It was observed with the synergistic effect in the fluorescence behavior of CDP (Figure A) with respect to the same of CD (Figure C) and PEI alone (Figure D) carbon dots.
Figure 1

(A) Schematic representation of the synthesis of C-dots through the hydrothermal reactor followed by visualization of CDP and CD under visible light and UV light differentiates the UV excited fluorescence. UV–vis absorbance spectra of (B) curcumin alone, (C) CD, and (D) CDP.

Figure 2

Excitation-dependent fluorescence emission of (A) CDP with excitation from 340 to 500 nm and (B) normalized excitation-dependent emission intensity of CDP. Emission spectra of (C) CD and (D) PEI alone hydrothermal treated carbon dots with respect to different excitation.

(A) Schematic representation of the synthesis of C-dots through the hydrothermal reactor followed by visualization of CDP and CD under visible light and UV light differentiates the UV excited fluorescence. UV–vis absorbance spectra of (B) curcumin alone, (C) CD, and (D) CDP. Excitation-dependent fluorescence emission of (A) CDP with excitation from 340 to 500 nm and (B) normalized excitation-dependent emission intensity of CDP. Emission spectra of (C) CD and (D) PEI alone hydrothermal treated carbon dots with respect to different excitation. As-synthesized CD and CDP were further dissolved in water, methanol, dimethylformamide (DMF), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to investigate the effect of the solvent on the fluorescent behavior. In both the carbon dots, it is found that the water dissolved sample is harvested with a promising fluorescent yield (Figure A and B). This clearly indicates the high solubility of synthesized C-dots toward universal solvent and does not hinder the fluorescent activity. Also, in CDP, maximum fluorescence was observed in DMF. This might be due to the presence of the amide group on the surface of the carbon dots which was further verified by FTIR. Furthermore, both carbon dots did not display any significant reductions in emission intensity onset of excitation by a 150 W Xe lamp for about 30 min as demonstrated in Figure C and Figure D. The improved photostability enriches the efficiency of CDP and C-dots as a potential biological labeling agent. Quantum yield was measured and represented as in Table S1 by a single-point method and found to be 2.28% and 8.607% for CDP and CD, respectively. All the fluorescent-based characterizations showed positive results toward the efficiency of C-dots in susceptible usage in the biomedical scenario.
Figure 3

Effect of different solvents including water, methanol, DMSO, and DMF on fluorescence emission in (A) CD and (B) CDP. The photostability study of (C) CD and (D) CDP under constant excitation with a xenon lamp for 30 min.

Effect of different solvents including water, methanol, DMSO, and DMF on fluorescence emission in (A) CD and (B) CDP. The photostability study of (C) CD and (D) CDP under constant excitation with a xenon lamp for 30 min.

Zeta Potential and DLS (Hydrodynamic Diameter) Analysis

Curcumin owns a high negative zeta potential of −26 mV.[17] The zeta potential of CD was −12 mV as in Figure A. This is due to the destruction of some of the functional groups of curcumin upon the carbon dots synthesis. The positive charge bearing PEI resulting upon passivation made considerable changes in the zeta potential of the CDP and turned out to be +3.68 mV (Figure B). The amide bond was formed due to the reaction of the keto group of curcumin and the amine group of PEI. This resulted in less amino group being present on the surface of CDP, making the zeta potential less positive as a cumulative surface charge. The hydrodynamic size of the CD was found to be 4.190 nm (Figure C), and that of CDP was 5.011 nm (Figure. D). The increased size of the C-dots upon passivation ensures that the knowledge of efficient passivation with PEI was correct and corroborates the zeta potential results as mentioned above.
Figure 4

Zeta potential of (A) CD and (B) CDP. The hydrodynamic diameter of (C) CD and (D) CDP.

Zeta potential of (A) CD and (B) CDP. The hydrodynamic diameter of (C) CD and (D) CDP.

TEM and SAED Analysis

The size and nature of the phase of carbon dots was examined by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). HRTEM images depict smaller, near spherical formation of nanoparticles. For CD the average diameter was found to be 3.28 nm with the perspective of Figure A, and for CDP it was 4.45 nm (Figure B). The mean size was obtained by using imageJ2 software analysis. Overtaking proper dilution of carbon dots, the hydrodynamic diameter was found to be 4.19 nm for CD and 5.011 nm for CDP by dynamic light-scattering assay. In both of the cases, the diameter is slightly higher than that measured in the TEM micrograph. The possible reason for this fluctuation is due to the aqueous environment present in the DLS assay, while dry samples were micrographed in HRTEM. Furthermore, SAED patterns of carbon dots showed diffused rings indicating the amorphous phase of the nanoparticles (Figure S2) in both CD and CDP. The amorphous nature of carbon dots[18] is indicating the carbon dots were properly synthesized.
Figure 5

High-resolution transmission electron microscopic (HRTEM) image of (A) CD and (B) CDP with inset revealing the size distribution. (C) FTIR spectra of (blue line) curcumin, (red line) CD, and (black line) CDP.

High-resolution transmission electron microscopic (HRTEM) image of (A) CD and (B) CDP with inset revealing the size distribution. (C) FTIR spectra of (blue line) curcumin, (red line) CD, and (black line) CDP.

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopic Analysis

The chemical characterization of CD and CDP were further extended toward the FTIR spectral assay. In the fingerprint region (1300–400 cm–1) a noticeable change is observed from carbon dots to curcumin alone. The smoothening of the curves in Figure C (red and black lines) indicates carbonization of curcumin during hydrothermal treatment. Broadening of 3432 cm–1 peaks from curcumin to CD and CDP indicates the formation of more −NH2 and −OH groups. Furthermore, the increase of peak height at 1632 cm–1 signifies the formation of an amide =C=O bond according to the used synthesis precursors.[3]

FE-SEM Analysis (Elemental Mapping and Elemental Composition)

Elemental composition was analyzed for CDP by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) via FESEM (Figure S3). A significant percentage of oxygen was also found along with the presence of carbon and nitrogen which is in accord with the low positive zeta potential value of CDP in spite of the presence of PEI as a passivating agent. Furthermore, elemental mapping was performed, corroborating the EDS data (Figure S4).

Ion Sensing Property

The fluorescent-based sensors are an interesting research area being studied around the globe. The metal ion sensing probes are beloved to researchers, among the many. To critically examine the analytical property of synthesized CD from curcumin, with the presence of various metal ions, the fluorescence intensity was observed. The metal ions including Fe3+, Ag+, and Cu2+ ions caused the reduction in the fluorescent intensity of CD at the onset of incubation. A change in the fluorescence intensity of CD (0.1 mg mL–1) due to the presence of various metal ions (each at a concentration of 60 μM) is depicted in Figure A.The nonspecific interaction between these metal ions and functional groups of CD might be the probable reason for the fluorescence quenching. Among them Fe3+ exhibits the strongest quenching efficiency, and this can be exploited for specific Fe3+-based metal sensor application by CD.[19,20] The concentration dependent fluorescence quenching on Fe3+ was further evaluated and obtained with a steady decline in the fluorescence of CD in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure B). Further, the fluorescence quenching efficiency of CD was described with the Stern–Volmer plot to extrapolate a correlation coefficient of 0.9928 (a perfect linear correlation) in a concentration range of 0–6 μM (Figure C). The relative fluorescence response of CD (F0/F) was calculated with the following equationwhere F0 and F are the fluorescence intensities of CD in the absence and presence of Fe3+, and X represents the concentration of Fe3+. In the above equation Ksv (slope of the linear fit) was calculated as 11.54 × 104 mol–1 dm–3. Likewise, the detection limit of Fe3+ was calculated with 3σ/m as 0.62 μM, where σ is the standard deviation of the blank signal (n = 3) and m the slope of the linear fit. As per the WHO report[21] the maximum permissible level of Fe3+ is 5.36 μM in drinking water. Since our synthesized CD can sense the Fe3+ far below the range as mentioned above, it can be a possible Fe3+ sensor. This discrimination outcome for Fe3+ ions resulted from the exceptional coordination between hydroxyl groups of CD and Fe3+ ions, as compared to existing reports.[22,23]
Figure 6

(A) Relative fluorescence emission intensity quenching by 12 metal ions. The values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Fluorescence quenching of CD with the addition of different concentrations of Fe3+. (C) Relative fluorescence response values (F0/F) of CD with respect to 0–6 μM concentration of Fe3+· (D) DPPH free radical scavenging activity of CDP.

(A) Relative fluorescence emission intensity quenching by 12 metal ions. The values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Fluorescence quenching of CD with the addition of different concentrations of Fe3+. (C) Relative fluorescence response values (F0/F) of CD with respect to 0–6 μM concentration of Fe3+· (D) DPPH free radical scavenging activity of CDP.

Antioxidant Activity of CDP

A few existing reports suggest the antioxidant potential of C-dots.[24,25] One of the most commonly used ways to conduct the antioxidant activity study is the DPPH-based assay. DPPH is a free radical with nitrogen. It is deep purple in color, upon reaction with an antioxidant, and this deep purple color will eventually change to yellow with respect to the antioxidant potential (Figure S5). Varying concentrations of CDP were mixed with 50 μM DPPH in methanol. After incubation with CDP, we found a decrease in absorbance at 517 nm. As the results were obtained and demonstrated in Figure D, the free radical scavenging ability of CDP was found to increase in a concentration-dependent manner. As the initial concentration moved to high concentration (from 5 to 50 μg mL–1) increment, there was a considerable escalation in the scavenging activity from 22 to 56%. The EC50 value (amount of antioxidant necessary to decrease the concentration of DPPH by 50%) of CDP was estimated to be 18.2 μg mL–1 from the curve.

Bacterial Labeling by CDP

Due to the flexibility of CDPs in their multicolor fluorescence, ultrasmall size, better photostability, and high biocompatibility, C-dots can be used as a potential biolabeling agents. On the way to explore its biolabeling activity, E. coli DH5α and S. aureus bacteria were used as Gram-negative and Gram-positive model systems. The bacteria were incubated, and a fluorescence micrograph of labeled bacteria is represented in Figure A along with the controls (unlabeled bacteria) for comparison. The CDP labeled bacteria at different excitation resulted in blue, green, and light red color fluorescence. A time-dependent bacterial labeling study was also performed (Figure B). The CDP was able to retain their ability to fluoresce the cells after cellular uptake of 3 h of incubation and displayed excellent multicolor fluorescence. However, no bactericidal effects were observed in bacteria labeling with the CDP at the high concentration of 0.1 mg mL–1. However, the mechanism of bacterial labeling by carbon dots is still unknown. The possible fluorescence labeling might be because the different emissive energy traps[26] on the surface of the CDP that were produced during hydrothermal treatments enhance the fluorescent emission onset of incubation and excitation.
Figure 7

Fluorescence microscopic images of (A) S. aureus and E. coli DH5α with different treatment of CDP under Blue filter (UV-2A, 330–380 nm), Green filter (B-2A, 450–490 nm), and Red filter (G-2A, 510–560 nm) excitation. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence microscopic images of CPs labeled DH5α E. coli and S. aureus. Scale bar 100 μM.

Fluorescence microscopic images of (A) S. aureus and E. coli DH5α with different treatment of CDP under Blue filter (UV-2A, 330–380 nm), Green filter (B-2A, 450–490 nm), and Red filter (G-2A, 510–560 nm) excitation. (B) Time-dependent fluorescence microscopic images of CPs labeled DH5α E. coli and S. aureus. Scale bar 100 μM.

MTT Assay

The biomedical imaging application of synthesized CDP was first to critically evaluate for the biocompatibility on both cancer and normal cell lines. In this regard, mouse embryo fibroblast cells (NIH 3T3) were used as a normal cell model, whereas human lung adenocarcinoma cells (A549) and human colorectal adenocarcinoma (HCT-15) were considered as the cancer cell models. The calculated results were plotted on a graph as shown in Figure A. The results thus obtained had IC50 values of 580, 408, and 413 μg/mL toward NIH 3T3, A549, and HCT-15 cell lines, respectively. The change in the IC50 values with respect to the cell lines is a clear indication of rapid cellular uptake in the case of cancer cells[27] correlating its high metabolism and was absent in the case of a normal cell. Upon treatment with CDP, the gradual decrement in the cell viability was shown in each stage and cell lines used. The maximum usable concentration of cell-based bioimaging is found to be 0.4 μg/mL and hence used for multicolor fluorescent imaging. The comparative cytotoxicity was determined by presuming untreated control owing to 100% viability.
Figure 8

(A) Cell viability analysis of CDP against NIH 3T3, A549, and HCT-15 cells by MTT assay. Two-way ANOVA was carried out by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for statistical difference between the group means (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001, ns-non significant). (B) The multicolor biolabeling potential of CDP in A549, NIH 3T3, and HCT-15 cell lines displays DAPI (Blue), GFP (Green), RFP (Red), and merged images (Overlay). The values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Scale bar = 100 μm.

(A) Cell viability analysis of CDP against NIH 3T3, A549, and HCT-15 cells by MTT assay. Two-way ANOVA was carried out by Tukey’s multiple comparison test for statistical difference between the group means (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.005, ***p < 0.001, ns-non significant). (B) The multicolor biolabeling potential of CDP in A549, NIH 3T3, and HCT-15 cell lines displays DAPI (Blue), GFP (Green), RFP (Red), and merged images (Overlay). The values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Scale bar = 100 μm.

Bioimaging in Cell Lines

The multicolor biolabeling potential of CDP was explored in A549, NIH 3T3, and HCT-15 cell lines. The bright-field images of CDP-treated cells show intact morphology after the CDP incubation, which shows no detrimental effect of CDP on these cells. The onset of excitation of A549 cells shows excellent blue, green, and less red fluorescence than all other cell lines (Figure B). The differentiative staining of the cells was highly visible in A549 cells. This may be because the high metabolism and cellular uptake happen in the cancer cells.[26] The NIH 3T3 cell shows less fluorescent imaging potential when compared with the other two cell lines, and even red fluorescence completely faded. On the other hand, HCT-15 cells show less fluorescent image in blue filter, whereas reasonable images were obtained upon treatment. However, the images showing a ubiquitous distribution of CDP inside the whole cell and little colocalization of CDP in the nucleus were found without cell type discrimination.

Biocompatibility Studies in Zebrafish

We have conducted zebrafish embryo toxicity (ZET) tests to introduce the embryos of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) to evaluate the toxicity[28] of CDP on a course of 24 h. After the treatment of the CDP, the uptake of the CDP occurred through the highly permeable chorionic membrane in the 4-HPF embryo.[29] The toxicity of embryos was get reduced when compared with cell lines, due to the selective nature of the chorionic membrane. The survivability of the embryo shown upon treatment with CDP at 0.5 μg/mL was about 52% as shown in Figure A. The initial low concentrations have a nonsignificant impact on the zebrafish embryo. The embryos started dying upon treatment after 0.4 μg/mL concentration onward.
Figure 9

(A) In vivo toxicological assessment with varying concentration of CDP in Zebrafish embryos on a course of 24 h. The values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Bright-field (a) and multicolor fluorescence with blue (b), green (c), and red (d) images of zebrafish embryos after soaking for 24 h in 0.4 mg/mL concentration of CDP solutions.

(A) In vivo toxicological assessment with varying concentration of CDP in Zebrafish embryos on a course of 24 h. The values are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) Bright-field (a) and multicolor fluorescence with blue (b), green (c), and red (d) images of zebrafish embryos after soaking for 24 h in 0.4 mg/mL concentration of CDP solutions.

Bioimaging of Zebrafish Embryos

Zebrafish embryos were selected for the organism level of biolabeling due to ease of execution and developmental understanding. As expected from bacterial, cell-based biolabeling, the ubiquitous exhibition of CDP fluorescence was obtained (Figure B) simply by soaking 0.4 μg/mL concentration of CDP (arbitrary concentration used after the results obtained from cell-based biolabeling). The multicolor fluorescent microscopic images show the concise uptake of the CDP through the chorionic membrane. Increased fluorescent at the yolk sac region dictates more accumulation in the specified area due to the small size and accessibility of CDP onto the site.[30] Likewise, from the results obtained from cell-based biolabeling, zebrafish embryos also display higher fluorescence in green then blue and the least in red. The results are obtained as the excellent display of CDP in fluorescent imaging which can be exploited as the best alternative for high-cost contrasting probes.

Conclusion

We have synthesized carbon dots from curcumin as a green source with the aid of hydrothermal reaction in a one-step, facile manner (Figure ). The nonaqueous soluble curcumin was transformed into a highly hydrophilic carbon dot after hydrothermal synthesis. Furthermore, the surface passivation came into effect with PEI, leading to enhanced bioavailability and fluorescent behaviors. The synthesized carbon dots exhibited excellent fluorescence intensity (in red, green, blue filters), high photostability, and efficient multicolor fluorescent emission upon excitation. The average size of CDP was found to be below 10 nm with near-spherical shape and was amorphous in nature, which was confirmed with TEM analysis. Also, the potentiality of CD toward the Fe3+ sensing was taken into consideration and found to be an efficient Fe3+ ion sensor at the micromolar level. The CPDs were also seen to show antioxidant activity. The remarkable multicolor fluorescence emission of CDP services their ability to label bacterial cells with ease. Optimal labeling time was also found by performing time-dependent bacterial labeling. The simple, cost-effective, and efficient CDP was standardized in biolabeling of mammalian cells. The study was further extended to the animal level using zebrafish embryo as a model system. The tunable optical behaviors and surface functionalization of CDP depict potential membership in the optical imaging probe category. We, therefore, believe that the curcumin-based green synthesized CDP can effectively overcome the gap between diagnosis and therapy in cancer and infectious diseases.
Figure 10

Schematic diagram of multilevel labeling potential of synthesized CDP in prokaryotes to eukaryotes to organism level. Upon cellular uptake and excitation, CDP displays excellent multifluorescent properties.

Schematic diagram of multilevel labeling potential of synthesized CDP in prokaryotes to eukaryotes to organism level. Upon cellular uptake and excitation, CDP displays excellent multifluorescent properties.

Experimental Section

Materials

All the chemicals were of analytical grade and used without any modification. Curcumin, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), mercury(II) chloride, lead(II) nitrate, ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, cobalt(II) nitrate hexahydrate, zinc nitrate hexahydrate, ferric chloride anhydrous, and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were brought from Himedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., India, whereas calcium chloride, copper sulfate, and magnesium chloride were provided by SRL (Sisco Research Laboratories) Pvt. Ltd., India. Cadmium acetate and silver nitrate were received from Merck Ltd., India. Solvents like hydrochloric acid (HCl) and N-dimethylformamide (DMF) were from Rankem Pvt. Ltd., India. Nickel(II) acetate tetrahydrate was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Listed solvents such as methanol and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were received from SD-Fine Chemicals Limited (SDFCL), India. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) was procured from Amresco, USA. Lastly, quinine sulfate was purchased from Loba Chemie Pvt. Ltd., India. Ultrapure water was used to prepare all the solutions.

Synthesis of Carbon Dots

PEI passivated fluorescent C-dots were synthesized by a one-pot hydrothermal synthesis method as elucidated in Figure (A). In a typical synthesis, 0.3 g of curcumin was added to a solution containing 60 mL of water and 20 mL of ethanol. It was followed by addition of 0.4 g of PEI and stirred vigorously at 80 °C for 30 min. The color of the solution changed from yellow to red at the onset of PEI addition to curcumin. This solution was later followed by hydrothermal treatment for 12 h at 200 °C heating and 15 kg/cm2 g pressure in a nitrogen environment. The dark brown solution was obtained after the system was cooled down and followed with filtering with 125 mm filter paper and centrifuged at 15 000 rpm for 30 min to separate the less fluorogenic, insoluble deposit from fluorogenic, brown supernatant. The supernatant containing the surface-passivated C-dots was referred to as CDP. Similarly, nonpassivated C-dots were synthesized by a similar scheme but without PEI, and the resulting supernatants were referred to as CD.

UV–vis Spectroscopy Characterization of C-Dots

The UV–vis double beam spectrophotometer (Lasany, LI-2800) was used to find the absorption behavior of the synthesized C-dots. The scanning range for the samples was set at 200–800 nm with a step size of 0.5 nm. “UV–VIS Analyst” software equipped with the spectrophotometer was used to record and analyze data. All the samples were diluted 100 times for measurements.

Fluorescence Spectrophotometer

A fluorescence spectrophotometer (Hitachi F-4600, Japan) was used to record the fluorescence spectra of C-dots with a scan speed of 240 nm/min with excitation slit width of 5 nm and emission slit width of 5 nm. The fluorescence behavior was studied by choosing an excitation range of 340–500 nm with 20 nm increment. 100-fold dilution of the samples was used.

FTIR Spectrophotometer

An FTIR spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet) was used to study Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) around the range of 4000–400 cm–1 implementing the KBr pellet method.

Zeta Potential

Zeta potential measurements were done by a Zetasizer nano-ZS90 series (Malvern Instruments Pvt. Ltd., Germany). A clear disposable zeta cell was used, and 1 mL of sample was taken in it. Three rounds of measurements each with 15 zeta runs were performed for analysis.

Field-Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM)

For measurement of elementary composition, 15 μL C-dots were dropped on a properly shaped glass slide and then air-dried. This was gold sputtered and was subjected to FE-SEM provided with EDX (energy-dispersive X-ray detector) working at 15–20 keV. Elemental mapping was also obtained for a different element like carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen.

Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)

The C-dots were properly diluted with water, and 15 μL volume of the same was dropped onto the nonshining side of the TEM grids (carbon-coated copper grid). Images of the sample were taken after proper air drying by TEM (FEI TECHNAI G2) functioning at 120 keV. The average particle size was calculated after estimating the size of 40 particles using ImageJ software.

Photostability Test

Photostability of fluorescent carbon dots was tested by a Hitachi F-4600 fluorescence spectrophotometer equipped with a xenon lamp at an emission wavelength of 446 nm for CDP and 396 nm for CD with a scan time of 1800 s. The excitation and emission slit width were kept at 5 nm.

Quantum Yield Measurements

The quantum yield of the samples was calculated by a single-point scheme by keeping quinine sulfate as a reference which has a quantum yield of about 0.54 at 360 nm.[2] The following equation was used to calculate the quantum yield.Here Q = the quantum yield of the sample; I = the integrated emission intensity (area under the emission curve); η = refractive index, and A = the optical density. The subscript R is the reference fluorophore with a quantum yield which is known. To minimize the reabsorption effects, absorbance in the 10 mm fluorescence cuvette was kept below 0.1 at the excitation wavelength. The excitation slit width was set to be 1.0 nm, whereas the emission slit width was 2.5 nm. The parameter as mentioned above was set to excite the samples and recorded their fluorescence spectra in the wavelength range of 375–700 nm, respectively.

Metal Ion Sensing Evaluation

All the stock solutions of metal ion were made from their chemical salts. A final concentration of 60 μM of these metal ions was obtained by further diluting with deionized water. CD (10 μL, 0.1 mg mL–1) was added to each of the different metal ion solutions and homogenized well. This was followed by an incubation of 15 min at ambient temperature provided. An equal volume of all the aliquots was transferred to a 96-well black plate in respective wells, and the fluorescence measurement was performed in the multiplate reader (Biotek, Cytation 3). Similar steps were followed for Fe3+ ion sensing too. For this assay, 10 μL of CD solution was mixed with 1 mL of Fe3+ salt solutions in varying concentrations. The fluorescence spectrum was documented by setting excitation wavelength at 280 nm.

Determination of Antioxidant Activity

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical assay with few modifications was used to measure the antioxidant potential of CDP. Initially, 0.5 mL of 50 Mm solution of DPPH was prepared in methanol, and different concentrated samples of CDP were further added. The total volume of all prepared solutions was maintained at 0.6 mL. The samples were incubated for 30 min along with appropriate controls in the dark environment. An amount of 180 μL of the solution was taken in a microcell quartz cuvette, and change of absorbance was noted at 517 nm in an UV–vis spectrophotometer. The following formula was used to calculate the percentage radical scavenging activity of CD.[31]where AD = DPPH absorbance (without CDP) and AS = the absorbance of the sample solution (with CDP).

Bacteria Labeling Studies

To study bacteria labeling property, the Gram-positive S. aureus (MTCC 737) and Gram-negative DH5α E. coli were purchased from IMTECH, India, chosen as model systems. Initially, the overnight grown culture of both bacterial strains was subcultured to obtain a secondary grown culture. From this culture, 1 mL was taken in an Eppendorf tube and centrifuged for 1 min at 9000 rpm and then the pellet was washed twice with autoclaved PBS. Finally the obtained pellet was resuspended in 100 μL of PBS with 100 μL of CDP (0.1 mg/mL) and incubated for 3 h. An amount of 5 μL of the samples was deposited on glass slides and allowed to air-dry for fluorescence microscope imaging. Similarly, time-dependent bacterial labeling was performed for optimizing the labeling time.

Cell Culture

Human lung adenocarcinoma cells (A549), mouse embryo fibroblast cells (NIH 3T3), and human colorectal adenocarcinoma (HCT-15) were procured from the National cell line repository (National Centre for Cell Sciences, Pune, India). Further, A549 and NIH 3T3 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), whereas HCT-15 grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640) medium was augmented with 10% v/v fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillinstreptomycin solution. The cells were routinely maintained in a CO2 incubator provided with 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37 °C in a humidified chamber. Mitochondrial probe mediated cytotoxicity was assessed by MTT assay. Toxicity of treatment with CDP was colorimetrically estimated by the activity of mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzymes in actively respiring cells to convert the aqueous soluble, yellow MTT into an insoluble, purple formazan as a product. The quantification of purple formazan formation was done at an absorbance of 570 nm in a microplate reader (Biotek, Cytation 3). Briefly, the cells were seeded in 24-well tissue culture plates at a seeding density of 0.05 × 106 cells per well. Overnight incubation was given for the proper attachment, and later cells underwent incubation with culture media along with varying concentration of CDP in different wells for 24 h. After the incubation, the medium was carefully withdrawn from each well and underwent phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) wash. A fresh medium with 100 μL of 5 mg mL–1 solution of yellow MTT was poured into each well and kept in the cells for 4 h. The reaction was terminated and followed the addition of 1 mL of DMSO to solubilize the purple formazan crystals. Finally, the absorbance at 570 nm of each well was taken for cell viability calculations. The untreated control (with 100% viability) is taken as the relative value in the viability calculations. The viability [mean (%) ± SEM, n = 3] is calculated in the form of an equation as follows:

Bioimaging Studies

The multicolor imaging of live cells with the use of CDP was explored in A549, NIH 3T3, and HCT-15 cell lines. Primarily, the cells were grown at a density of 0.3 × 106 in 6 cm well culture dishes and grown overnight. This was replaced with a fresh medium mixed with 0.4 mg mL–1 of filter-sterilized CDP (IC50 concentration obtained after MTT) in the respective wells and incubated for 24 h. Following PBS wash twice, the CDP fluorescence was bioimaged by an inverted fluorescent microscope (EVOS FL Color, AMEFC 4300) equipped with LED light cubes in respective filters. Bright-field images were taken in transmitted mode, the DAPI filter having an excitation of 360 nm and emission 447 nm, GFP with excitation of 470 nm and emission of 525 nm, and RFP with an excitation of 530 nm and emission of 593 nm LED light cubes. The overlay images were obtained by superimposing the images taken from all the filters as mentioned above.

Zebrafish Biocompatibility and Bioimaging

The full genome sequenced wild-type (ASWT) strain[32] of zebrafish (Danio rerio) was gifted by Dr. Sridhar Sivasubbu (Developmental Biology and Genomics lab, CSIR-IGIB, India) and was maintained in aquaneering zebrafish facility with continuous flow of 4 step sterilized system water with parameter set as pH at 7.8, conductivity of 710 μs, 28 °C temperature, dissolved oxygen (>4 ppm), and total gas pressure of 99.9%. The system was provided with an alternative 10 h dark and 14 h light cycle. All the zebrafish-based experimental procedures are conducted by following OECD guidelines 203. Sexually matured 6-month aged male and female fish were brought to the breeding tank overnight (1 male:1 female). The next day, fertilized eggs were microscopically selected by their transparent nature. The 4 h postfertilized (4HPF) embryos were used for further studies. A total of 10 embryos were transferred into a 24-well plate provided with the E3 medium. The concentration-dependent toxicity toward zebrafish embryos was estimated with 10 fish embryos per well upon treatment with CDP to 24 h. Toxicity was measured as follows [mean (%) ± SEM, n = 3] comparing with untreated control (the no. of samples selected in each case is 10).where C is the constant factor with respect to no. of embryos per well to make 100. Therefore,The CDP-treated zebrafish embryos were bioimaged after a treatment of 24 h. The multicolor fluorescent images were taken in Leica M205 FA attached with a Leica DFC-7000 T camera along with pE 300 Cool LED for the light illumination of fluorescent excitation in DAPI (blue), GFP (green), and RFP (red), whereas bright-field images were taken directly. All images were captured in the Planapo 1.0X objective lens.
  16 in total

1.  Fe2O3/carbon quantum dots complex photocatalysts and their enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light.

Authors:  Hengchao Zhang; Hai Ming; Suoyuan Lian; Hui Huang; Haitao Li; Lili Zhang; Yang Liu; Zhenhui Kang; Shuit-Tong Lee
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.390

2.  One-step synthesis of amino-functionalized fluorescent carbon nanoparticles by hydrothermal carbonization of chitosan.

Authors:  Yunhua Yang; Jianghu Cui; Mingtao Zheng; Chaofan Hu; Shaozao Tan; Yong Xiao; Qu Yang; Yingliang Liu
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Fish embryo toxicity test: identification of compounds with weak toxicity and analysis of behavioral effects to improve prediction of acute toxicity for neurotoxic compounds.

Authors:  Nils Klüver; Maria König; Julia Ortmann; Riccardo Massei; Albrecht Paschke; Ralph Kühne; Stefan Scholz
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  A new Rhodamine B-based 'on-off' chemical sensor with high selectivity and sensitivity toward Fe(3+) and its imaging in living cells.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Bao; Jiaxin Shi; Xuemei Nie; Baojing Zhou; Xinlong Wang; Luyong Zhang; Hong Liao; Tao Pang
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  The effect of external medium composition on membrane water permeability of zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos.

Authors:  Serean L Adams; Tiantian Zhang; David M Rawson
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Green synthesis of multifunctional carbon dots from coriander leaves and their potential application as antioxidants, sensors and bioimaging agents.

Authors:  Abhay Sachdev; P Gopinath
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality.

Authors:  H G Gorchev; G Ozolins
Journal:  WHO Chron       Date:  1984

8.  Self-Assembled Hybrids of Fluorescent Carbon Dots and PAMAM Dendrimers for Epirubicin Delivery and Intracellular Imaging.

Authors:  Ishita Matai; Abhay Sachdev; P Gopinath
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 9.  Regulation of cancer cell metabolism.

Authors:  Rob A Cairns; Isaac S Harris; Tak W Mak
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon dots for Fe(3+) sensing and cellular imaging.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Gong; Wenjing Lu; Man Chin Paau; Qin Hu; Xin Wu; Shaomin Shuang; Chuan Dong; Martin M F Choi
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 6.558

View more
  18 in total

1.  Green Synthesis of Self-Passivated Fluorescent Carbon Dots Derived from Rice Bran for Degradation of Methylene Blue and Fluorescent Ink Applications.

Authors:  Vinoth Kumar Jothi; Kavitha Ganesan; Abirami Natarajan; Arulmozhi Rajaram
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Microwave-Assisted Green Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots Derived from Calotropis Gigantea as a Fluorescent Probe for Bioimaging.

Authors:  Neetu Sharma; Indu Sharma; Milan Kumar Bera
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Tinospora cordifolia Leaves Derived Carbon dots for Cancer Cell Bioimaging, Free radical Scavenging, and Fe3+ Sensing Applications.

Authors:  Debadatta Mohapatra; Ravi Pratap; Vivek Pandey; Pawan K Dubey; Ashish K Agrawal; Avanish S Parmar; Alakh N Sahu
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 4.  Carbon Nanodots from an In Silico Perspective.

Authors:  Francesca Mocci; Leon de Villiers Engelbrecht; Chiara Olla; Antonio Cappai; Maria Francesca Casula; Claudio Melis; Luigi Stagi; Aatto Laaksonen; Carlo Maria Carbonaro
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 5.  Carbon dots for cancer nanomedicine: a bright future.

Authors:  Samer Bayda; Emanuele Amadio; Simone Cailotto; Yahima Frión-Herrera; Alvise Perosa; Flavio Rizzolio
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-07-08

Review 6.  Recent advances in green carbon dots (2015-2022): synthesis, metal ion sensing, and biological applications.

Authors:  Aisha Kanwal; Naheed Bibi; Sajjad Hyder; Arif Muhammad; Hao Ren; Jiangtao Liu; Zhongli Lei
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Multi-Functional Carbon Dots from an Ayurvedic Medicinal Plant for Cancer Cell Bioimaging Applications.

Authors:  Gaurav Gopal Naik; Md Bayazeed Alam; Vivek Pandey; Debadatta Mohapatra; Pawan K Dubey; Avanish S Parmar; Alakh N Sahu
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Facile Conversion of Toxic Cigarette Butts to N,S-Codoped Carbon Dots and Their Application in Fluorescent Film, Security Ink, Bioimaging, Sensing and Logic Gate Operation.

Authors:  Rajkumar Bandi; Neela Priya Devulapalli; Ramakrishna Dadigala; Bhagavanth Reddy Gangapuram; Veerabhadram Guttena
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-10-18

9.  Subgram-Scale Synthesis of Biomass Waste-Derived Fluorescent Carbon Dots in Subcritical Water for Bioimaging, Sensing, and Solid-State Patterning.

Authors:  Rina Su; Dan Wang; Mei Liu; Jia Yan; Jie-Xin Wang; Qiuqiang Zhan; Yuan Pu; Neil R Foster; Jian-Feng Chen
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2018-10-15

10.  Characterization of food waste-driven carbon dot focusing on chemical structural, electron relaxation behavior and Fe3+ selective sensing.

Authors:  Jungbin Ahn; Younghan Song; Ji Eon Kwon; Jeongyeon Woo; Hyungsup Kim
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.