| Literature DB >> 30411031 |
Rina Su1,1, Dan Wang1, Mei Liu2, Jia Yan2, Jie-Xin Wang1,1, Qiuqiang Zhan3, Yuan Pu1, Neil R Foster1,4, Jian-Feng Chen1,1.
Abstract
Fluorescent carbon dots (Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30411031 PMCID: PMC6217608 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the SBCW apparatus coupled with a freeze dryer.
Figure 2Schematic diagram for the route to FCDs from milk by the hydrolysis of protein and subsequent Maillard reaction in SBCW.
Figure 3(a) Typical picture of dried FCD powder in one batch reaction. (b) Typical TEM image of FCDs (inset: size distribution histogram). (c) FTIR spectrum of the FCDs. (d) XPS spectrum of the FCDs. (e–f) High-resolution XPS C 1s and N 1s spectra of the FCDs.
Figure 4(a) UV–visible absorption (blue line), fluorescence excitation (red line), and emission (black line) spectra of the FCDs (λex = 360 nm, λem = 440 nm). The inset shows the photographs of the FCDs in aqueous solutions under daylight irradiation (left) and a 365 nm UV lamp excitation (right). (b) Emission spectra of the FCDs at different excitation wavelengths from 330 to 480 nm. (c) Fluorescent spectra of the FCDs at different temperatures (λex = 360 nm).
Figure 5Cell viability by CCK-8 assay of (a) HeLa cells incubated with different concentrations of the FCDs for 6 h and (b) mouse BMSCs P2 treated with the synthesized FCDs at different concentrations for 0, 12, 24, and 48 h.
Figure 6Two-photon excited fluorescence imaging of HeLa cells. (a) Control cells without FCD treatment and (b) cells incubated with 200 μg/mL of FCDs for 6 h.
Figure 7(a) Fluorescence emission spectra of the FCDs, Fe3+, and FCDs + Fe3+ (λex = 360 nm). (b) UV–visible absorption spectra of the FCDs, Fe3+, and FCDs + Fe3+.
Figure 8(a) Fluorescence emission spectra of the FCDs with different concentrations of Fe3+ (λex = 360 nm). (b) Linear correlation of (F0/F) vs the Fe3+ concentration in the range of 0.5–1.4 mM. (c) Fluorescence responses of the FCDs for the addition of different common cations, and the concentration of each cation is 2 mM (λex = 360 nm).
Figure 9(a) Photographs of the FCD patterns drawn from the FCD ink under daylight and (b) 365 nm UV lamp excitation. (c) Fluorescence emission spectra of the FCDs in solid state and background fluorescence of the paper (λex = 360 nm).
Figure 10(a) Photographs of FCDs/SiO2 nanocomposite films with different volumes of FCDs (11 mg/mL) under daylight and (b) 365 nm UV lamp excitation. (c) Fluorescence emission spectra of FCDs/SiO2 nanocomposite films with different volumes of FCDs (11 mg/mL, λex = 410 nm). (d) Photographs of FCDs/SiO2 nanocomposite powders under daylight and (e) 365 nm UV lamp excitation.