| Literature DB >> 30023328 |
Vnira Rakhimovna Akhmetova1, Rozalia Akramovna Galimova2, Nail Salavatovich Akhmadiev1, Albina Midkhatovna Galimova2, Ravil Akhmetzyanovich Khisamutdinov3, Galiya Maratovna Nurtdinova1, Eduard Feliksovich Agletdinov2, Valery Alekseevich Kataev2.
Abstract
Purpose: This research is devoted to designing the synthesis of sulfanyl-substituted 3,5-dimethylisoxazoles, which contain structural analogues of the SAM drug in the molecule. SAM (S-adenosyl-L-methionine), formed in the biosynthetic process, is used as an effective hepatoprotective drug. Complexation and hepatoprotective properties of the combinatorial series of bis(isoxazolylsulfanyl)ethane have been studied.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatitis; Hepatoprotector; In vivo; Isoxazoles; Liver; Metal-organic frameworks
Year: 2018 PMID: 30023328 PMCID: PMC6046414 DOI: 10.15171/apb.2018.031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Pharm Bull ISSN: 2228-5881
Figure 1
Figure 2Crystallographic and structure refinement data for 2c and 2d
|
|
|
|
| Empirical formula | C16H24N2O2S2 | C16H24N2O2S3 |
| Formula weight | 340.49 | 372.55 |
| T/K | 298 | 298 |
| Crystal system | orthorhombic | monoclinic |
| Space group | Pbcn | P21/c |
| a/Å | 17.514(2) | 5.0140(7) |
| b/Å | 7.8852(9) | 11.6177(7) |
| c/Å | 13.027(2) | 33.308(9) |
| α/° | 90 | 90 |
| β/° | 90 | 93.45(2) |
| γ/° | 90 | 90 |
| V/Å3 | 1799.1(4) | 1936.7(6) |
| Z | 4 | 4 |
| ρcalcmg/cm3 | 1.257 | 1.278 |
| μ/mm-1 | 0.304 | 0.392 |
| F(000) | 728.0 | 792.0 |
| Crystal size/mm3 | 0.54 × 0.26 × 0.22 | 0.71 × 0.30 × 0.28 |
| 2Θ range for data collection | 4.66 to 62.82° | 6.03 to 62.04° |
| Index ranges | -25 ≤ h ≤ 22 | -7 ≤ h ≤ 3 |
| Reflections collected | 9025 | 4900 |
| Independent reflections | 2712[Rint = 0.0737, | 3079[Rint = 0.0198, |
| Data/restraints/parameters | 2712/0/126 | 3079/0/212 |
| Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 1.057 | 1.050 |
| Final R indexes [I>=2σ (I)] | R1 = 0.0570, wR2 = 0.1524 | R1 = 0.0744, wR2 = 0.1750 |
| Final R indexes [all data] | R1 = 0.0898, wR2 = 0.1934 | R1 = 0.1034, wR2 = 0.1943 |
| Largest diff. peak/hole / e Å-3 | 0.32/-0.29 | 0.40/-0.22 |
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 2Effects of compounds 1a, 2a, 3 and SAM 5 survival of white mice with acute toxic hepatitis
|
|
|
|
| Saline solution 0.2 mL/kg (intact group) | 10 | 100 |
| CCl4 0.2 mL/kg (control group) | 10 | 50 |
| SAM 25 mg/kg + CCl4 0.2 mg/kg | 10 | 80 |
|
| 10 | 70 |
|
| 10 | 60 |
|
| 10 | 100 |
Effects of compounds 1a, 2a, 3 and SAM on indicators AST, ALT, and direct bilirubin serum white mice with acute toxic hepatitis
|
|
|
|
|
| Control intact | 1.49 ± 0.22 | 1.09 ± 0.07 | 8.3 ± 2.2 |
| Control (CCl4) | 4.72 ± 0.57* | 1.71 ± 0.14* | 19.5 ± 5.1* |
| SAM+ CCl4 | 2.21 ± 0.21 | 0.92 ± 0.06 | 11.2 ± 3.2 |
|
| 1.51 ± 0.31** | 0.98 ± 0.02** | 10.4 ± 2.6** |
|
| 2.32 ± 0.48** | 0.94 ± 0.06** | 20.1 ± 4.5 |
|
| 2.68 ± 0.64 | 0.93 ± 0.07 | 18.8 ± 5.1 |
Note: * - significant differences between indicators of intact animals, ** - significant differences from that of group CCl4