| Literature DB >> 30022794 |
Graeme J Hankey1,2.
Abstract
Supplementation with B vitamins (vitamin B9(folic acid), vitamin B12 and vitamin B6) lowers blood total homocysteine (tHcy) concentrations by about 25% and reduces the relative risk of stroke overall by about 10% (risk ratio (RR) 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99) compared with placebo. Homocysteine-lowering interventions have no significant effect on myocardial infarction, death from any cause or adverse outcomes. Factors that appear to modify the effect of B vitamins on stroke risk include low folic acid status, high tHcy, high cyanocobalamin dose in patients with impaired renal function and concurrent antiplatelet therapy. In regions with increasing levels or established policies of population folate supplementation, evidence from observational genetic epidemiological studies and randomised controlled clinical trials is concordant in suggesting an absence of benefit from lowering of homocysteine with folic acid for prevention of stroke. Clinical trials indicate that in countries which mandate folic acid fortification of food, folic acid supplementation has no significant effect on reducing stroke risk (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.23). However, in countries without mandatory folic acid food fortification, folic acid supplementation reduces the risk of stroke by about 15% (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.94). Folic acid alone or in combination with minimal cyanocobalamin (≤0.05 mg/day) is associated with an even greater reduction in risk of future stroke by 25% (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86), whereas the combination of folic acid and a higher dose of cyanocobalamin (≥0.4 mg/day) is not associated with a reduced risk of future stroke (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.05). The lack of benefit of folic acid plus higher doses of cyanocobalamin (≥0.4 mg/day) was observed in trials which all included participants with chronic kidney disease. Because metabolic B12 deficiency is very common and usually not diagnosed, future randomised trials of homocysteine-lowering interventions for stroke prevention should probably test a combination of folic acid and methylcobalamin or hydroxocobalamin instead of cyanocobalamin, and perhaps vitamin B6.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30022794 PMCID: PMC6047336 DOI: 10.1136/svn-2018-000156
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stroke Vasc Neurol ISSN: 2059-8696
Figure 1Homocysteine metabolism and the methionine and folate cycles. 5,10-MTHF, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate; 5-Me THF, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate; B6, pyridoxine; B12, cobalamin; MTHFR, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; SAH, S-adenosylhomocysteine; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; THF, tetrahydrofolate. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.12
Effect of renal function and dose of cyanocobalamin on stroke reduction by B vitamins
| Trial | Dose of cyanocobalamin (μg) | Serum creatinine (μmol/L*) B vitamins | Control | Stroke | P values |
| VISP† | 400 | 99.9 (55.7) | 97.2 (47.7) | 1.0 (0.8 to 1.3) | 0.80 |
| VITATOPS‡ | 500 | 92.4 (40.3) | 91.4 (34.6) | 0.92 (0.81 to 1.06) | 0.25 |
| DIVINe | 1000 | 141.4 (97.2) | 123.8 (79.6) | 6.6 (0.8 to 54.4) | 0.08 |
| SEARCH | 1000 | NA | NA | 1.02 (0.86 to 1.21) | NA |
| CSPPT | 0 | 65.95 (19.0) | 65.95 (19.0) | 0.79 (0.68 to 0.93) | 0.003 |
| CSPPT | 0 | 126.6 (72.7) | 130.6 (68.6) | 0.88 (0.33 to 2.36) | 0.81 |
| eGFR<60§ | |||||
| CSPPT | 0 | 64.7 (13.8) | 64.6 (13.6) | 0.79 (0.67 to 0.92) | 0.003 |
| Excluding eGFR<60§ | |||||
| NORVIT | 400 | 91 (27) | 91 (24) | 0.83 (0.47 to 1.47) | 0.52 |
| HOPE | 1000 | 88.4 (26.5) | 88.4 (26.5) | 0.75 (0.59 to 0.97) | 0.03 |
| SU.Fol.OM3 | 20 | 78.0 (70.0-88.0) | 78.0 (69.0–88.0) | 0.57 (0.33 to 0.97) | 0.04 |
Individual data were obtained from both VISP32 and VITATOPS33 trials. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.12
*Data are presented as mean (SD), unless otherwise specified.
†Patients with an eGFR of less than 50 mL/min/1.73 m² had a mean eGFR rate (SD) of 38.7 mL/min/1.73 m² (9.2) (control 39.3 mL/min/1.73 m² (8.6); composite outcomes HR (95% CI) 1.01 (0.74 to 1.37; p=0.977)). Patients with an eGFR of 50 mL/min/1.73 m² or more had mean eGFR rate of 89.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (44.6) (control 87.3 (31.1); composite outcomes HR 0.92 (0.77 to 1.11; p=0.382)). Composite outcomes refer to myocardial infarction, stroke or death.
‡Patients with an eGFR of 50 mL/min/1.73 m² or less had a mean eGFR rate (SD) of 38.6 mL/min/1.73 m² (10.0) (control 38.3 (9.5); composite outcomes HR (95% CI) 0.88 (0.59 to 1.32; p=0.54)). Patients with an eGFR of more than 50 mL/min/1.73 m² had a mean eGFR rate of 80.2 (18.1) (control 80.9 (18.3); composite outcomes HR 0.82 (0.68 to 0.98; p=0.03)). Composite outcomes refer to myocardial infarction, stroke or death.
§mL/min/1.73 m².
CSPPT, China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m²); NA, not applicable; VISP, Vitamins Intervention for Stroke Prevention; VITATOPS, VITAmins TO Prevent Stroke.
SEARCH: Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Reductions of Cholesterol and Homocysteine