| Literature DB >> 30022609 |
Birgitta Langhammer1,2, Katharina S Sunnerhagen3, Susanne Sällström2, Frank Becker2,4, Johan K Stanghelle2,4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Stroke may impose disabilities with severe consequences for the individual, with physical, psychological, social, and work-related consequences. The objective with the current study was to investigate to what extent persons with stroke were able to return to work, to maintain their financial situation, and to describe the follow-up services and participation in social networks and recreational activities.Entities:
Keywords: disability; rehabilitation; return to work; stroke
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30022609 PMCID: PMC6085896 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Behav Impact factor: 2.708
Descriptives at baseline in the different settings: Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Norway; China Rehabilitation Research Center, China; Rusk Institute, United States; Policlinica 2, Russia; Sheba Medical, Israel; Bethlehem Arab Society Rehabilitation, Palestine; El Wafa, Gaza; Högsbo‐Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden; and Bayi, China
| Sunnaas ( | CRRC ( | Rusk Inst ( | Pol. clin 2 ( | Sheba ( | BASR ( | El Wafa ( | SU/Högsbo ( | Bayi ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years (m, | 59.7 (9.8) | 49.5 (13.5) | 63.6 (16.1) | 58.2 (13.4) | 61.2 (12.6) | 60.2 (14.4) | 58.1 (11.9) | 57.3 (5.2) | 58.5 (14.1) |
| Gender (male/female) | 22/9 | 23/12 | 9/8 | 18/12 | 12/2 | 16/14 | 5/3 | 27/3 | 22/13 |
| Marital status: married/single/widow | 14/17/0 | 31/4/0 | 9/6/2 | 23/2/5 | 12/1/1 | 21/2/7 | 7/0/1 | 19/11/0 | 31/2/2 |
| Years in education | |||||||||
| 0–6 years/7–12 years/13+ | 1/14/16 | 3/17/15 | 0/3/14 | 1/9/20 | 1/5/8 | 16/9/5 | 1/2/5 | 0/19/11 | 9/15/11 |
| NIHSS | 7.5 | 6.5 | 4.4 | 11.7 | 6.4 | 8.4 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 9.9 |
| mRS | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 4.1 |
| ADL (0–100; m, | 67.5 (17.2) | 45.6 (22.6) | 49.6 (17.5) | 56.7 (25.4) | 43.9 (27.1) | 45.9 (17.8) | 49.4 (29.1) | 64.8 (17.1) | 38.9 (26.0) |
| Length of stay (LOS; m, | 43.3 (25.6) | 69.3 (37.9) | 21.9 (5.8) | 51.3 (9.1) | 82.5 (36.7) | 34.8 (22.3) | 33.9 (26.1) | 46.1 (16.1) | 59.3 (35.8) |
0 = no stroke symptoms, 1–4 = minor, 5–15 = moderate, 16–20 = moderate to severe, 21–42 = severe symptoms.
1 = no stroke symptoms, 2 = minor, 3 = moderate, 4 = moderate to severe, 5 = severe symptoms, 6 = dead.
Persons with stroke on admission, 6 and 12 months post discharge (n = x/x/x) who reported having returned to work, in percentages, in the nine clinician the SIN network
| Sunnaas ( | CRRC ( | Rusk ( | Pol. clin 2 ( | Sheba ( | BASR ( | El Wafa ( | SU/Högsbo ( | Bayi ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status (%) empl/unempl/ret | ||||||||||
| Baseline | 52/19/29 | 63/9/29 | 59/6/35 | 53/10/37 | 86/7/7 | 27/53/20 | 50/25/25 | 77/10/13 | 31/17/51 | 0.005* |
| 6 months post discharge | 7/32/36 | 14/26/40 | 30/30/30 | 43/23/33 | 7/79/7 | 7/63/3 | 38/13/50 | 13/70/10 | 17/37/43 | 0.15 |
| 12 months post discharge | 42/13/45 | 17/32/52 | 35/12/41 | 43/23/33 | 21/36/43 | 10/53/37 | 25/25/50 | 20/53/23 | 11/31/54 | 0.14 |
Employed/unemployed/retired.
*p < 0.05.
Figure 1Satisfaction with life as a whole 6 and 12 months post stroke rehabilitation
Figure 2Satisfaction with vocational situation 6 and 12 months post stroke rehabilitation
Differences between 6 and 12 months in patients’ perceptions of their work, financial situation, health insurance, follow‐up, recreational and social activities, and networks
| Sunnaas ( | CRRC ( | Rusk rehab ( | Pol. clin 2 ( | Sheba ( | BASR (30) | El Wafa ( | SU/Högsbo ( | Sichuan Bayi ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Work | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.73 | 0.04 | 0.68 |
| Financial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Follow‐up | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.73 | NS | NS | NS | 0.03 | 0.53 |
| Recreational |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Network | 0.41 | 0.03 | 0.56 | NS | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 0.01 | 0.32 |
*p < 0.05.
(a) Logistic Regression model at 6 months predicting 15%–24% of RTW, explanatory factors. (b) Logistic Regression model at 12 months predicting 6%–8% of RTW, explanatory factors
| OR |
| 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | ||||
| Age | 1.0 | 0.009 | 1.00 | 1.1 |
| Education | 0.91 | 0.04 | 0.82 | 1.0 |
| NIHSS | 0.92 | 0.12 | 0.84 | 1.0 |
| mRS | 2.7 | 0.001 | 1.7 | 4.3 |
| Country | 0.99 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 1.1 |
| (b) | ||||
| Age | 1.0 | 0.048 | 1.00 | 1.1 |
| Education | 0.98 | 0.61 | 0.92 | 1.05 |
| NIHSS | 0.96 | 0.28 | 0.89 | 1.0 |
| mRS | 1.3 | 0.24 | 1.7 | 4.3 |
| Country | 1.1 | 0.03 | 1.0 | 1.3 |
Exp(B) in the respective countries ranging from 0.2 to 6.6.
Exp(B) in the respective countries ranging from 0.6 to 6.6.