Literature DB >> 30022548

Similar effect of intermittent theta burst and sham stimulation on corticospinal excitability: A 5-day repeated sessions study.

Ruben Perellón-Alfonso1, Magdalena Kralik1,2, Indre Pileckyte1, Matic Princic1, Jurij Bon1, Caspar Matzhold1,2, Benjamin Fischer1,2, Petra Šlahorová1,2, Zvezdan Pirtošek1, John Rothwell3, Maja Kojovic1.   

Abstract

Despite accumulating evidence of inter and intraindividual variability in response to theta burst stimulation, it is widely believed that in therapeutic applications, repeated sessions can have a "build-up" effect that increases the response over and above that seen in a single session. However, strong evidence for this is lacking. Therefore, we examined whether daily administration of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over the primary motor cortex induces cumulative changes in transcranial magnetic stimulation measures of cortical excitability, above the changes induced by sham stimulation. Over five consecutive days, 20 healthy participants received either active iTBS or sham stimulation. Each day, baseline measures of cortical excitability were assessed before and up to 30 min after the intervention. There was no significant difference in the rate of response between iTBS and sham stimulation on any of the 5 days. There was no iTBS specific cumulative increase of corticospinal excitability. The likelihood that an individual would remain a responder from day-to-day was low in both groups, implying high within-subject variability of both active and sham iTBS after-effects. In contrast, we found a high within-subject repeatability of resting and active motor threshold, and baseline motor-evoked potential amplitude. In summary, sham stimulation has similar effect to active iTBS on corticospinal excitability, even when applied repeatedly for 5 days. Our results might be relevant to research and clinical applications of theta burst stimulation protocols.
© 2018 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  motor cortex; plasticity; transcranial magnetic stimulation; variability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30022548     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  10 in total

1.  The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation on corticomotor excitability of the biceps brachii in nonimpaired individuals.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Adam P Sima; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation modulates biceps brachii corticomotor excitability in individuals with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Blaize C Majdic; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Facilitation of Motor Evoked Potentials in Response to a Modified 30 Hz Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation Protocol in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Katarina Hosel; François Tremblay
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-12

4.  The Effects of Priming Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation on Movement-Related and Mirror Visual Feedback-Induced Sensorimotor Desynchronization.

Authors:  Jack Jiaqi Zhang; Kenneth N K Fong
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Determining the optimal pulse number for theta burst induced change in cortical excitability.

Authors:  Daniel M McCalley; Daniel H Lench; Jade D Doolittle; Julia P Imperatore; Michaela Hoffman; Colleen A Hanlon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  BDNF Val66Met gene polymorphism modulates brain activity following rTMS-induced memory impairment.

Authors:  Kilian Abellaneda-Pérez; Pablo Martin-Trias; Catherine Cassé-Perrot; Lídia Vaqué-Alcázar; Laura Lanteaume; Elisabeth Solana; Claudio Babiloni; Roberta Lizio; Carme Junqué; Núria Bargalló; Paolo Maria Rossini; Joëlle Micallef; Romain Truillet; Estelle Charles; Elisabeth Jouve; Régis Bordet; Joan Santamaria; Simone Rossi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Olivier Blin; Jill Richardson; Jorge Jovicich; David Bartrés-Faz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Sham-derived effects and the minimal reliability of theta burst stimulation.

Authors:  P O Boucher; R A Ozdemir; D Momi; M J Burke; A Jannati; P J Fried; A Pascual-Leone; M M Shafi; Emiliano Santarnecchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of neuroanatomy on corticomotor excitability during and after transcranial magnetic stimulation and intermittent theta burst stimulation.

Authors:  Neil Mittal; Bhushan Thakkar; Cooper B Hodges; Connor Lewis; Yeajin Cho; Ravi L Hadimani; Carrie L Peterson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.399

9.  Adding a Second iTBS Block in 15 or 60 Min Time Interval Does Not Increase iTBS Effects on Motor Cortex Excitability and the Responder Rates.

Authors:  Ilya Bakulin; Alfiia Zabirova; Dmitry Sinitsyn; Alexandra Poydasheva; Dmitry Lagoda; Natalia Suponeva; Michael Piradov
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-08-11

10.  Modulation of corticomotor excitability in response to distal focal cooling.

Authors:  Yekta Ansari; François Tremblay; Anthony Remaud
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.