| Literature DB >> 30021707 |
Tanvir M Huda1, Ashraful Alam1, Tazeen Tahsina2, Mohammad Mehedi Hasan2, Jasmin Khan2, Mohammad Masudur Rahman2, Abu Bakkar Siddique2, Shams El Arifeen2, Michael J Dibley1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate feeding practices, inadequate nutrition knowledge, and insufficient access to food are major risk factors for maternal and child undernutrition. There is evidence to suggest that the combination of cash transfer and nutrition education improves child growth. However, a cost-effective delivery platform is needed to achieve complete, population-wide coverage of these interventions.Entities:
Keywords: mHealth; unconditional cash transfer; undernutrition; voice message
Year: 2018 PMID: 30021707 PMCID: PMC6070725 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.8832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ISSN: 2291-5222 Impact factor: 4.773
Methods, numbers, and types of respondents for the qualitative information.
| Method and type of respondent | Number (N=21) | |
| Enrolled pregnant women | 7 | |
| Enrolled recently delivered mothers | 7 | |
| Husbands of enrolled women | 5 | |
| Mothers-in-law of enrolled women | 2 | |
Characteristics of study participants at baseline and the end of the study.
| Characteristic | Baseline (n=340), n (%) | End of study (n=275), n (%) | |||
| 15-24 | 179 (52.9) | 140 (50.9) | |||
| 25-34 | 144 (42.4) | 120 (43.6) | |||
| 35-44 | 16 (4.7) | 14 (5.1) | |||
| No education | 42 (12.4) | 35 (12.7) | |||
| Primary incomplete | 84 (24.7) | 69 (25.1) | |||
| Primary complete | 59 (17.4) | 49 (17.8) | |||
| Secondary incomplete | 118 (34.7) | 95 (34.5) | |||
| Secondary or higher | 36 (10.6) | 26 (9.5) | |||
| No education | 107 (31.5) | 90 (32.7) | |||
| Primary incomplete | 76 (22.4) | 63 (22.9) | |||
| Primary complete | 43 (12.7) | 35 (12.7) | |||
| Secondary incomplete | 72 (21.2) | 54 (19.6) | |||
| Secondary or higher | 42 (12.4) | 32 (11.6) | |||
| Unskilled laborer | 102 (30.0) | 89 (32.4) | |||
| Skilled worker | 59 (17.4) | 47 (17.1) | |||
| Business/Trade | 57 (16.8) | 46 (16.7) | |||
| Service holder | 41 (12.1) | 28 (10.2) | |||
| Others | 79 (23.2) | 64 (23.3) | |||
| Poorest | 69 (20.5) | 58 (21.1) | |||
| Second | 66 (19.6) | 56 (20.4) | |||
| Middle | 68 (20.2) | 56 (20.4) | |||
| Fourth | 67 (19.90) | 51 (18.5) | |||
| Richest | 67 (19.9) | 53 (19.3) | |||
| Household had at least one mobile | 303 (89.1) | 243 (88.4) | |||
| Household had electricity | 158 (46.5) | 124 (45.1) | |||
| Secure | 164 (48.7) | 138 (50.2) | |||
| Mildly food-insecure | 9 (2.7) | 5 (1.8) | |||
| Moderately food-insecure | 93 (27.6) | 81 (29.5) | |||
| Severely food-insecure | 71 (21.1) | 50 (18.2) | |||
Barriers in using mobile platform for nutrition counseling and cash transfer (n=275).
| Barrier | n (%) | ||
| Very good | 87 (31.6) | ||
| Good | 140 (50.9) | ||
| Average | 37 (13.4) | ||
| Not good | 11 (4.0) | ||
| Had difficulties receiving calls | 16 (5.8) | ||
| Had difficulties making calls | 30 (10.9) | ||
| Home | 142 (51.64) | ||
| Neighbor’s house | 72 (26.18) | ||
| Marketplace | 94 (34.18) | ||
Feasibility and perceived appropriateness of nutrition education through mobile voice messaging (n=275).
| Voice message outcomes | n (%) | |
| Received all voice messagesa | 101 (36.8) | |
| Missed at least one voice message | 173 (63.1) | |
| Reasons for failing to receive voice messagesb | ||
| Was busy with household chores | 119 (66.5) | |
| Mobile was out of charge | 60 (33.5) | |
| Family members received messages (at least once) | 87 (32.8) | |
| 95 (34.7) | ||
| Due to poor network | 86 (90.5) | |
| Due to too much ambient noise | 9 (9.5) | |
| Yes | 11 (4.0) | |
| No | 263 (96.0) | |
| Had difficulties understanding the messages (at least once) | 22 (8.0) | |
| Received text message mistakenly (at least once) | 30 (10.9) | |
| Messages were appropriate as per pregnancy and child age | 265 (96.0) | |
| The frequency of messages was appropriate | 230 (78.8) | |
| Amount of information in each message was appropriate | 263 (96.0) | |
aThe total number of voice messages was 48.
bAmong women who reported missing at least 1 message.
Feasibility and perceived appropriateness of direct nutrition counseling through mobile phone (n=275).
| Call center outcomes | n (%) | ||
| Received all calls from the call centera | 92 (33.4) | ||
| Ever missed any call from the call center | 183 (66.5) | ||
| Was busy with household chores | 108 (59.0) | ||
| Mobile was out of charge | 61 (33.3) | ||
| Other family members spoke to the counselor (at least once) | 80 (29.1) | ||
| Called the call center on her own (at least once) | 151 (50.9) | ||
| Didn’t feel the need | 114 (84.5) | ||
| Satisfied with the counseling and response to queries | 221 (95.2) | ||
| Counseling was appropriate as per pregnancy and child age | 270 (98.2) | ||
| Frequency of counseling was appropriate | 215 (78.2) | ||
| Direct counseling should be more frequent | 60 (21.9) | ||
| Amount of information in each counseling was appropriate | 270 (98.2) | ||
| Voice messaging | 14 (5.1) | ||
| Direct counseling from the call center | 90 (32.7) | ||
| Both | 171 (62.2) | ||
aThe total number of counseling calls was 12.
Feasibility and acceptability of cash transfer through mobile banking from the end of study survey (n=275).
| Cash transfer and mobile banking outcomes | n (%) | |
| A mobile bank account in the participant’s name | 150 (54.6) | |
| A mobile bank account in the name of participant’s husband | 98 (35.6) | |
| A mobile bank account in the name of another family member | 27 (9.8) | |
| Difficulties understanding the cash transfer notification | 73 (24.91) | |
| Failed to read or understand the short message service (SMS) | 37 (50.68) | |
| Could not check the balance | 34 (46.58) | |
| Husband | 169 (61.5) | |
| Self | 70 (25.5) | |
| Other family members | 36 (13.0) | |
| Restriction from the family | 97 (48.0) | |
| Mobile agent office was too far | 64 (31.7) | |
| Did not know where to withdraw cash | 34 (16.8) | |
| No bank account on her name | 19 (9.4) | |
| Difficulties withdrawing cash | 8 (2.9) | |
| Herself | 165 (60.6) | |
| Husband | 56 (20.6) | |
| Both | 40 (14.7) | |
| Purchase food for mother and child | 236 (86.8) | |
| Purchased food for the family | 42 (15.4) | |
| Used for another family purpose | 14 (5.2) | |
| Used to buy livestock | 11 (4.0) | |
| Savings | 44 (16.2) | |
Willing to participate and pay for similar services in future from the end of study survey (n=275).
| Willingness to participate and pay | n (%) |
| Willing to receive nutrition education via voice message service in future | 255 (93.1) |
| Willing to pay for voice messaging | 234 (91.8) |
| Amount to pay for voice message, mean (SD); median | 5.3 (6.5); 3.0 |
| Willing to receive counseling via call center in future | 252 (91.6) |
| Willing to pay for counseling | 241 (95.6) |
| Amount to pay for each counseling, mean (SD); median | 6.2 (6.1); 5.0 |
| Willing to join similar services even if no phone is given | 251 (91.2) |
| Will use my old phone | 108 (43.0) |
| Would buy a new phone | 64 (25.5) |
| Husband’s phone | 71 (28.3) |
| Others | 8 (3.2) |