Literature DB >> 30020974

Role of genetic and electrolyte abnormalities in prolonged QTc interval and sudden cardiac death in end-stage renal disease patients.

Monica Coll1, Carles Ferrer-Costa2, Sara Pich2, Catarina Allegue1, Emilio Rodrigo3, Gema Fernández-Fresnedo3, Paloma Barreda3, Jesus Mates1, Angel Luis Martinez de Francisco3, Israel Ortega2, Anna Iglesias1, Oscar Campuzano1, Eduardo Salas2, Manuel Arias3, Ramon Brugada1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease have very high mortality. In individuals on hemodialysis, cardiovascular deaths account for ~50% of all deaths in this population, mostly due to arrhythmia. To determine the causes of these arrhythmic deaths is essential in order to adopt preventive strategies. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether, the presence of QTc interval alterations, from electrolyte abnormalities or presence of rare genetic variants, could have a relationship with sudden arrhythmogenic deaths in end-stage renal disease patients.
METHODS: We recorded the pre- and post-dialysis QTc interval in 111 patients undergoing hemodialysis. In 47 of them, we analyzed 24 SCD-related genes including the most prevalent genes associated with long QT syndrome using a custom resequencing panel.
RESULTS: We found a positive although not significant association between the presence of long QTc and mortality in a subset of end-stage renal disease patients. In addition, in five patients with long QTc only after dialysis (21.7%) we detected rare potentially pathogenic genetic variants. Three out of these five carriers subsequently died suddenly.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic background may be determinant in the risk of sudden cardiac death in these patients. We recommend evaluating the QTc interval before and after hemodialysis, and performing a genetic analysis of individuals with long QTc after hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30020974      PMCID: PMC6051653          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as either kidney damage or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) below 60ml/min/1.73m2 for ≥ 3 months[1], is a very relevant health entity. CKD has a prevalence of 4.7–8.1% in people ages 60 and older and of 0.5%, in the population between the ages of 20 and 39 years of age [2, 3]. People with CKD are at higher mortality risk compared with the general population. In fact, cardiovascular deaths (CD) account for ~50% of all deaths in CKD, particularly in individuals on hemodialysis (HD)[4]. Most cardiovascular deaths in this patient population involves arrhythmic mechanisms[5]. The risk factors predisposing to sudden cardiac death (SCD) include low concentration of potassium in the dialysate, diabetes mellitus, advanced age, and undergoing dialysis session after the weekend break[6]. In some studies have reported that HD sessions may induce altered ventricular repolarization with QTc interval prolongation, which could be a potential arrhythmic risk for these patients [7]. The QTc interval prolongation in CKD may be induced by electrolyte level alteration. Thus, in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), prolongation of the QTc interval has always been believed related to changes in serum potassium, magnesium, calcium and phosphate levels during HD[7, 8], and specially linked to the composition of the hemodialysis bath, since the longest QTc interval duration occurs with low-potassium and low calcium dialysate[9]. However, long QTc intervals could also be caused by a combination of electrolyte and genetic factors, as it is well known that genetic variants in genes encoding ion channels may be responsible for QTC alterations and long QT Syndrome (LQTS). However, investigation of a genetic background potentially predisposing to long QT in ESRD has yet to be performed. Thus, in order to further understand the mechanisms leading to arrhythmogenicity in HD patients we aim at investigating the QTc interval in ESRD patients both before and after HD, and its relation with the presence of rare genetic variants associated with LQTS.

Materials and methods

Sample selection and clinical data

The patients included in this study were selected from a cohort of patients treated for CKD at the Nephrology Department of Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (Santander, Spain). We included all outpatients (N = 143) undergoing HD therapy between May, 2011 and July, 2012 at the Nephrology Service of the Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital. All patients had a GFR of <15ml/min/1.73m2. We excluded individuals who were taking drugs known to prolong the QT interval, and those who had a pacemaker, bundle branch block or atrial fibrillation. Thirty-two of 143 patients met the exclusion criteria (22.38%), so 111 patients were finally included in the study (77.62%). We recorded the following demographic and clinical parameters: age, gender, race, height, weight, time on HD, disease etiology, classical cardiovascular risk factors, and cardiovascular and coronary events. Patients were followed up until December, 2014. This study was approved by the Institutional Human Research Review Board of the Hospital, was performed conform the declaration of Helsinki and all patients gave written informed consent to be included.

Dialysis

We performed haemodiafiltration with High Flux Helixone (Fresenius Medical Care, Germany) for four hours per session, with a mean blood flow 350 ± 40 mL/min and mean weight loss of 2.1 ± 0.3 Kg. All patients were treated with a dialysis regimen of bicarbonate dialysis with the following electrolyte composition in the bath (mmol/L): 140 Na+, 1.5 K+, 1.25 Ca2+, 0.5 Mg2+. Drug therapy was allowed during hemodialysis, with the exception of isotonic saline infusion and sodium heparin.

Electrocardiographic assessment

All enrolled patients underwent a resting, high-quality 12-lead ECG recording before and after the HD session in a standard setting (EGC recorder Cardiosoft model V6.0 with a CAM-14 module). The QT interval was measured by the investigators for each patient and was corrected for patient heart rate using Bazett’s formula: QTc = QT/√RR (ms), where QTc is the corrected value of the QT interval. ECG was recorded for a single HD session per patient. The recorded ECG was only used if the HD session took place without any unusual incidents and if the patient had been free of interfering factors (drugs affecting QT, fever, diarrhea, vomiting) for the previous 24 hours. The patients were classified in four groups depending on the QTc value before and after HD. A QTc of >460ms was considered prolonged[10]. Group 1, NNQTc (Normal-Normal QTc), included patients without prolonged QTc before or after the HD; Group 2, NLQTc (Normal-Long QTc), included patients with normal QTc before and prolonged QTc after HD; Group 3, LNQTc (Long-Normal QTc), included patients with prolonged QTc before and normal after HD; and Group 4, LLQTc (Long-Long QTc), included patients with a long QTc both before and after HD.

Laboratory analysis

A venous blood sample was drawn by phlebotomy immediately before and after HD sessions, collected in a sterile tube, placed immediately on ice, centrifuged on site within 90 min and frozen at -20°C. We quantified serum sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium ion concentrations using an ABL80 FLEX analyzer (Radiometer, Iberia). The following values were considered normal: Sodium, 135-145mEq/L; potassium, 3.5-5mEq/L; calcium, 8.1–10.4 mg/dL; magnesium, 1.6–2.4mg/dL.

Genetic analysis

DNA samples were obtained from 38 out of the 41 patients with long QTc. In 3 patients the DNA quality precluded genetic analysis and we could not obtain a second DNA sample from them as they had died by the time we performed the genetic analysis. Moreover, we obtained DNA sample from 9 patients with no QTc prolongation.

DNA isolation

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using the Chemagic MSM system I (Chemagic human blood). The concentration was checked using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies) and purity was evaluated by measuring the 260/280 absorbance ratios (~ 1.8) using a NanoDrop1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo scientific). We used 1% agarose gel to confirm that that there was no DNA degradation.

Custom resequencing panel

The custom panel design included genes known to be involved in SCD-related pathologies (SudDinCode®, Ferrer in Code). The genomic coordinates of these genes were uploaded to the eArray web-based probe design tool (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). All isoforms described in the UCSC browser were included in the design. The biotinylated cRNA probe solution was manufactured by Agilent Technologies and provided as capture probes. The final size was 680 kbp of encoding regions and UTR boundaries. The coordinates of the sequence data is based on NCBI build 37 (UCSC hg19). A 24-gene panel of genes associated with arrhythmogenic cardiac diseases was used: ANK2, CACNA1C, CACNB2, CASQ2, CAV3, DES, DSC2, DSG2, DSP, GPD1L, HCN4, JUP, KCNE1, KCNE2, KCNH2, KCNJ2, KCNQ1, LMNA, PKP2, PRKAG2, RYR2, SCN4B, SCN5A and TGFB3. The technical characteristics of the NGS sequencing were: call rate 30X (99.8%), the remaining 0.2% of the genome was sequenced by conventional Sanger Sequencing. Sensibility and specificity (SNPs and small indels) were both 100%.

Bioinformatics analysis

Our secondary bioinformatics process includes a first-step that trims the FAST-Q files originated by the MiSeq platform using a method developed by Gendiag.exe. The trimmed reads are then mapped with GEM II. The output from the mapping step is combined and sorted, and uniquely and properly mapping read pairs are selected. Finally, the cleaned BAM file is annotated using SAMtools v.1.18, GATK v2.4, and an ad hoc method developed to generate the first raw VCF files. Variants are annotated with dbSNP IDs[11]; Exome Variant Server, NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP), Seattle, WA and the 1000 Genomes browser[12], in-home database IDs and Ensemble information, where available. Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) was also consulted. An algorithm developed by Gendiag.exe was used to determine the pathogenicity of the detected variants according to the following criteria: variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) <1% in the general population and the status of “probably damaging” in Provean and Mutation Taster2 prediction were considered as rare/uncommon variants. The potential pathogenicity of missense variants was evaluated in silico using Provean and Mutation Taster2[13]. The performance of Provean is comparable to popular tools such as SIFT or PolyPhen-2[14, 15]. As supplemental data we used a UniProt database to consult the level of conservation between different species [16]. An in-house database of variants was used as an internal control. Rare genetic variants in genes related to long QT syndrome, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were confirmed by Sanger Sequencing.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables were expressed as percentages. Differences between two related samples were evaluated using a Paired-Samples T-test. We compared groups of continuous variables using ANOVA and of categorical variables using the χ2-test. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Survival analysis was conducted using the Log Rang Test and Kaplan-Meyer by software R (version 2.12). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) and R (http://r-project.org).

Results

Hemodialysis-related changes in QTc and prognostic implications

We recruited a total of 111 patients undergoing regular hemodialysis, of which 70 had normal QTc (63.1%; NNQTc), 24 had long QTc only after dialysis (21.6%; NLQTc), 8 had long QTc only before dialysis (7.2%;, LNQTc) and 9 had long QTc both before and after dialysis (8.1%; LLQTc). The average age was 66.27 (63.44–69.1), and 81/111 (73%) were male. We observed no significant differences between the four groups in terms of age (p = 0.24), gender (p = 0.78), diabetes (p = 0.82) or hypertension (p = 0.24) (Table 1, Table 2 and S1 Table).
Table 1

Basic characteristics of the entire cohort and of the sequencing group.

OverallNNQTcNLQTcLNQTcLLQTcP-value
Variableunit111 dialysis patients
Sample sizeN (%)111 (100%)70 (63.1%)24 (21.6%)8 (7.2%)9 (8.1%)
DiabetesN (%) *32 (30.5%)20 (29.4%)8 (38.1%)2 (28.6%)2 (22.2%)0.82
HypertensionN (%) *88 (83.8%)58 (85.3%)15 (71.4%)6 (85.7%)9 (100%)0.24
Age (years old)Mean (95%CI)66.27 (63.44–69.1)64.27 (60.38–68.17)68.17 (62.41–73.93)68.88 (61.6–78.14)73.56 (66.89–80.22)0.24
Male GenderN (%)81 (73%)51 (72.90%)17 (70.80%)7 (87.50%)6 (66.70%)0.78
QTc before HD(ms)Mean (95%CI)426.05 (419.14–432.95)409.44 (402.28–416.6)435.5 (426.72–444.28)481.38 (471.58–491.18)480.78 (468.08–493.49)
QTc after HD(ms)Mean (95%CI)440.66 (432.54–448.78)416.74 (411.24–422.25)493.54 (478.32–508.76)434 (412.15–455.85)491.56 (477.67–505.45)
DeathsN (%)34 (30.63%)14 (20%)9 (37.5%)5 (62.5%)6 (66.6%)0.008
LVEFMean (95%CI)55.73 (53.62–57.83)56.46 (53.83–59.09)55.57 (50.49–60.64)50 (31.9–68.1)54 (48.26-58-74)0.59
Table 2

Basic characteristics of the entire cohort and of the sequencing group.

OverallNNQTcNLQTcLNQTcLLQTcP-value
VariableUnit47 patients sequenced by NGS
Sample sizeN4792369
DiabetesN (%) 10 (27.02%)1 (12.5%)7 (35%)02 (22.2%)0.45
HypertensionN (%) 30 (73.17%)7 (87.5%)14 (70%)4 (80%)9 (100%)0.14
Age (years old)Mean (95%CI)68.32 (64.67–71.97)63.56 (53.99–73.12)67.65 (61.73–73.58)70.17 (58.07–82.27)73.56 (66.89–80.22)0.25
Male GenderN (%)30 (73.2%)7 (77.8%)17 (73.9%)5 (83.3%)6 (66.7%)0.86
QTc before HD (ms)Mean (95%CI)440.49 (428.65–452.33)386 (357.01–414.99)436 (426.87–445.13)479 (466.01–491.99)480.78 (468.07–493.49)
QTc after HD (ms)Mean (95%CI)470.57 (457.37–483.78)414.89 (401.41–428.37)494.52 (478.73–510.32)430.84 (400.93–460.7)491.56 (477.66–505.45)

Ms, milliseconds; NNQTc, NORMAL-NORMAL QTc; NLQTc, NORMAL-LONG QTc; LNQTc, LONG-NORMAL QTc; LLQTc, LONG-LONG QTc.

* Data available for 68, 21, 7 and 9 patients from the NNQTc, NLQTc, LNQTc and LLQTc groups, respectively.

† Data available for 8, 20, 5 and patients from the NNQTc, NLQTc, LNQTc and LLQTc groups, respectively.

Ms, milliseconds; NNQTc, NORMAL-NORMAL QTc; NLQTc, NORMAL-LONG QTc; LNQTc, LONG-NORMAL QTc; LLQTc, LONG-LONG QTc. * Data available for 68, 21, 7 and 9 patients from the NNQTc, NLQTc, LNQTc and LLQTc groups, respectively. † Data available for 8, 20, 5 and patients from the NNQTc, NLQTc, LNQTc and LLQTc groups, respectively. The potassium and magnesium levels decreased significantly following HD in the four groups (Table 3 and Table 4). Potassium levels were within normal range in pre-dialysis (except for LLQTc group) and decreased to a value below the normal range in post-dialysis. Magnesium levels were above the normal range in pre-dialysis and decreased to the normal range in post-dialysis. Calcium levels increased significantly after HD in all groups except NLQTc group, although the values were within normal range in all groups. Sodium levels after HD were not significantly different to those before HD in any group, and were also within the normal rang.
Table 3

Electrolyte levels of the entire cohort.

111 dialysis patients
VariableNNQTc (N = 70)NLQTc (N = 24)LNQTc (N = 8)LLQTc (N = 9)
Pre-HDPost-HDP-ValuePre-HDPost-HDP-ValuePre-HDPost-HDP-ValuePre-HDPost-HDP-Value
Sodium138.97(138.26–139.68)139.01(138.62-139-4)0.858139.13(137.92–140.33)139.25(138.21–140.29)0.845137.5(134.60-140-40)136.86(135.4–138.31)0.744137.89(135.63–140.14)138.22(136.74–139.7)0.74
Potassium4.96 (4.75–5.17)3.12 (3.03–3.22)P < .0014.9 (4.56–5.24)3.06 (2.92–3.2)P < .0014.48 (3.62–5.33)2.97 (2.67–3.28)P < .0015.18 (4.43–5.93)3.16 (2.86–3.46)P < .001
Calcium8.65 (8.51–8.78)8.93 (8.8–9.06)P < .0018.62 (8.27–8.98)8.89 (8.71–9.07)0.1098.4 (7.63–9.17)9.23 (8.4–10.06)0.012*8.36 (7.83–8.88)8.94 (8.49–9.4)0.002*
Magnesium2.51 (2.4–2.62)2.13 (2.08–2.17)P < .0012.43 (2.28–2.58)2.13 (2.05–2.2)P < .0012.35 (2.09–2.61)2.07 (1.89–2.25)0.0022.4 (1.91–2.89)2.02 (1.8–2.24)0.022*
Table 4

Electrolyte levels of the sequenced groups.

VariableNNQTc (N = 9)NLQTc (N = 23Ɨ)LNQTc (N = 6 ƗƗ)LLQTc (N = 9)
Pre-HDPost-HDP-ValuePre-HDPost-HDP-ValuePre-HDPost-HDP-ValuePre-HDPost-HDP-Value
Sodium140.11(137.96–142.27)140.11(138.81–141.41)1139.09(137.82–140.35)139.3(138.23–140.38)0.742139(136.8–141.2)137(134.68–139.32)0.047137.89(135.63–140.14)138.22(136.74–139.7)0.74
Potassium4.83 (4.18–5.48)3.03 (2.78–3.29)P < .0014.87 (4.52–5.22)3.05 (2.91–3.2)P < .0014.57 (3.31–5.82)3.04 (2.58–3.5)0.0035.18 (4.43–5.93)3.16 (2.86–3.46)P < .001
Calcium8.61 (8.23–8.99)8.91 (8.62–9.2)0.0978.6 (8.23–8.96)8.89 (8.7–9.07)0.0988.35 (7.21–9.49)8.9 (7.8–9.8)0.0658.36 (7.83–8.88)8.94 (8.49–9.4)0.002*
Magnesium2.83 (2.45–3.22)2.22 (2.12–2.33)0.003*2.41 (2.26–2.57)2.13 (2.05–2.2)P < .0012.37 (2–2.73)2.12 (1.85–2.39)0.0032.4 (1.91–2.89)2.02 (1.81–2.23)0.022*

Ɨ 22 available patients in potassium and magnesium levels.

ƗƗ 5 available patients in all the electrolyte levels. Sodium and potassium levels are expressed in mEq/L and calcium and magnesium levels are expressed in mg/gL. NNQTc, NORMAL-NORMAL QTc; NLQTc, NORMAL-LONG QTc; LNQTc, LONG-NORMAL QTc; LLQTc, LONG-LONG QTc. Values expressed as Mean (95%-CI).

*P value<0.05.

Ɨ 22 available patients in potassium and magnesium levels. ƗƗ 5 available patients in all the electrolyte levels. Sodium and potassium levels are expressed in mEq/L and calcium and magnesium levels are expressed in mg/gL. NNQTc, NORMAL-NORMAL QTc; NLQTc, NORMAL-LONG QTc; LNQTc, LONG-NORMAL QTc; LLQTc, LONG-LONG QTc. Values expressed as Mean (95%-CI). *P value<0.05. We found no significant differences in electrolyte levels between the four groups, except for post-dialysis sodium (p = 0.017) (S2 Table). Mortality: Overall, 30.63% of patients died during the study, with patients with long QTc having higher mortality than the control group (Table 1, Table 2 and S3 Table). The highest mortality was observed in group 4 (LLQTc; 66.66%) followed by group 3 (LNQTc; 62.5%) and group 2 (NLQTc; 37.5%). The lowest mortality was observed in patients in group 1 (NNQTc; 20%). QTc was significantly longer, both pre- and post- HD, among patients who died during follow-up than among those who survived (S4 Table). After Log Rank analysis (Table 5) no significant differences were identified (p = 0.144) however focusing on the Kaplan-Meyer curve the NNLQTc group showed higher survival than the groups with long QTc pre or post-HD. Additionally the groups of NLQTc and LNQTc showed the lower survival (Fig 1).
Table 5

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Group N1 year3 years5 years10 yearsP-value
NNQTc70100%95,1%±2,8%77,5%±6,3%69%±8%0,144
NLQTc2495,8%±4,1%86,8%±7,1%71,7%±9,9%55,1%±11,3%
LNQTc887,5%±11,7%62,5%±17,1%50%±17,7%25%±19,8%
LLQTc988.9%±10,57%76,2%±14,8%63,5%±16,9%42,3%±20,6%

NNQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and post-HD; NLQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and long post-HD; LNQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and normal post-HD; LLQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and post-HD. N: number of patients included in the corresponding group. P-value obtained from a Chi-squared test.

Fig 1

Kaplan-Meier curves for the 4 groups.

NNQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and post-HD; NLQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and long post-HD; LNQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and normal post-HD; LLQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and post-HD.

Kaplan-Meier curves for the 4 groups.

NNQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and post-HD; NLQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and long post-HD; LNQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and normal post-HD; LLQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and post-HD. NNQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and post-HD; NLQTc: QTc interval normal pre-HD and long post-HD; LNQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and normal post-HD; LLQTc: QTc interval long pre-HD and post-HD. N: number of patients included in the corresponding group. P-value obtained from a Chi-squared test.

Relationship between rare genetic variants in long QT syndrome genes and changes in QTc induced by hemodialysis

We sequenced a total of 47 patients, as follows: 9 patients from NNQTc group, 23 patients from NLQTc, 6 patients from LNQTc group, and 9 patients from LLQTc group. It was not possible to sequence one patient from NLQTc group, and two patients from LNQTc group due to poor DNA quality and the inhability of obtaining a new DNA sample (they died before the genetic testing was performed) (Table 1 and Table 2).

Potentially pathogenic variants

Ultra-sequencing genetic analysis identified five rare variants in genes related with long QT syndrome in five patients from the NLQTc group (Fig 2, Table 6 and Table 7). Index case 83 carried a private variant (KCNH2_p.P310S) not previously reported or identified in any of the available variant databases. Two unrelated patients (index cases 76 and 84) carried a variant (KCNQ1_p.K393N) that had previously been reported to be associated with long QT syndrome (CM078293), although via a different nucleotide change (cytosine, not a thymine). We identified a variant in the SCN5A gene (SNC5A_p.L461V) in case 86, previously associated with sudden adult death syndrome[17, 18]. Finally, we detected a variant (KCNE1_p.R67C) in index case 94 that had previously been reported as being associated with long QT syndrome [17].
Fig 2

Forward and reverse electropherograms of the uncommon variants identified.

A: KCNQ1_p.K393N; B: KCNH2_p.P310S; C: SCN5A_p.L461V; D: KCNE1_p.R67C.

Table 6

Description of the five uncommon variants identified, plus available clinical data.

Exome Sequencing Project and ExAC.

Index CaseGeneIsoformSNPHGMDProtein changecDNA changeMAF (%) EA/AllExAC (%)DiseasePolyPhen2Condel
76KCNQ1NM_000218.2rs12720457-p.Lys393Asnc.1179G>T0.0814/0.06920.1098LQTSPossibly damaging (0.770)Neutral (0.462)
83KCNH2NM_000238.3--p.Pro310Serc.928C>T---Benign (0.112)Neutral (0.018)
84KCNQ1NM_000218.2rs12720457-p.Lys393Asnc.1179G>T0.0814/0.06920.1098LQTSPossibly damaging (0.770)Neutral (0.462)
86SCN5ANM_198056.2rs41313697CM061953p.Leu461Valc.1381T>G0.0241/0.2940.1163SADSBenign (0.08)Neutral (0.392)
94KCNE1NM_000219.4-CM097703p.Arg67Cysc.199C>T-2.473.10–3LQTSProbably damaging (1)Deleterious (1)
Table 7

Description of the five uncommon variants identified, plus available clinical data.

Exome Sequencing Project and ExAC.

Index CaseGenderAgeQTc pre/postDiabetesHypertensionStatusCause of deathGeneral etiologySpecific etiology
76Male74440/626NoYesDeathUnknownVascularNephroangiosclerosis and/or ischemic nephropathy
83Male67453/474YesNoDeathCardiac arrestVascularNephroangiosclerosis
84Male43420/480YesYesHD-SystemicNephropathy diabetic
86Female85429/469YesYesHD-VascularNephroangiosclerosis and nephropathy diabetic
94Female80460/461NoYesDeathCardiac arrestVascularNephroangiosclerosis

Abbreviations: Age is expressed in years. MAF: minor allele frequency; EA: European American; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism. ExAC: Exome Aggregation Consortium, Cambridge, MA (URL: http://exac.broadinstitute.org) [(March, 2017) accessed]. SADS: Sudden adult death syndrome.

Forward and reverse electropherograms of the uncommon variants identified.

A: KCNQ1_p.K393N; B: KCNH2_p.P310S; C: SCN5A_p.L461V; D: KCNE1_p.R67C.

Description of the five uncommon variants identified, plus available clinical data.

Exome Sequencing Project and ExAC. Exome Sequencing Project and ExAC. Abbreviations: Age is expressed in years. MAF: minor allele frequency; EA: European American; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism. ExAC: Exome Aggregation Consortium, Cambridge, MA (URL: http://exac.broadinstitute.org) [(March, 2017) accessed]. SADS: Sudden adult death syndrome.

Variants of uncertain significance

Analysis of the 24 genes detected 20 common and uncommon variants in 16 patients (34.04%) (S5 Table), 11 of which (69%) were indels and 5 (31%) were single-point variants. We observed variants of uncertain significance in 7 patients with NNQTc, 6 with NLQTc, 3 with LNQTc and 4 with LLQTc. We identified uncommon variants in DSP, JUP, CACNB2, RYR2 and CACNA1C (2 cases) genes. Two cases with uncommon variants (index cases 10 and 102) carried the common rs17133512 variant in DSP. We were unable to identify any uncommon variants in 31 cases.

Discussion

For the past four decades, patients who are on renal replacement therapy have been known to have significant cardiovascular risk[19]. Most studies that have explored the basis of this risk have focused on fluctuations in blood ion levels as a result of HD, and their relation with increased QTc following HD. We have observed similar post-HD variations in ion levels as previously published[20]. However, the correlations of these ion levels with QTc are a matter of controversy. While Howse et al.[21], did not identify a correlation, Alabd et al.[9] reported a correlation between post-dialysis QTc and a decrease in serum levels of potassium and magnesium after dialysis. In order to shed some light in this issue, we have investigated the QTc duration before and after HD and included genetic analysis in patients with prolonged QTc interval. We identified twenty-four patients (21.6%) who had a prolonged QTc interval only after the HD session. This percentage increased to 29.7% when we added those patients with long QTc before and after HD (groups NLQTc and LLQTc together), and to 36.9% when we added those patients with long QTc before HD (LNQTc, NLQTc and LLQTc). These data are very similar to those published by Genovesi et al. in a cohort of 122 patients, in which they reported an incidence of QTc prolongation of 36% in patients on HD, as measured before, during and after dialysis[22]. Similar to previous studies, the length of the QTc interval was not associated with gender, age or hypertension[20]. In contrast to other reports, the QTc interval in our cohort was not associated with the presence of diabetes [23]. We identified a clear correlation between the presence of a long QTc interval and mortality in patients undergoing HD. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an association between QTc interval and mortality in HD patients. Accordingly, those patients who died during the study showed a higher QTc both pre- and post-HD than the surviving patients, which indicates that a higher QTc value is an indicator or a bad prognosis in HD patients. Genetic analysis of the main LQTS genes enabled the identification of five potentially pathogenic variants, which may be associated with prolongation of the QTc interval, in patients with prolonged QTc interval only after HD (NLQTc group). While we were unable to perform segregation studies, the high level of conservation between species indicates that these nucleotide changes may have an important role in protein function (Fig 3). Supporting this potential pathogenic role, in silico analysis also predicted a deleterious effect.
Fig 3

Sequence alignment for each variant in different species.

The position of the first amino acid of each sequence is indicated on the left, and the Uniprot reference for each protein is shown on the right. A: KCNQ1_p.K393N; B: KCNH2_p.P310S; C: SCN5A_p.L461V; D: KCNE1_p.R67C.

Sequence alignment for each variant in different species.

The position of the first amino acid of each sequence is indicated on the left, and the Uniprot reference for each protein is shown on the right. A: KCNQ1_p.K393N; B: KCNH2_p.P310S; C: SCN5A_p.L461V; D: KCNE1_p.R67C. In addition, we identified a large number of variants of unknown significance (20 variants, observed in 16 of 47 cases), of which 6 were uncommon. The role of variation in these genes in patients with ESRD merits further studies. The considerably higher frequency of variants in sodium and potassium channels in this patient group compared to the general population is intriguing. Gene expression databases indicate that potassium channels (KCNQ1, KCNH2 and KCNE1 genes) are expressed in renal cells (GTEX and the human protein atlas database). The function of basolateral Kv7.1 (KCNQ1) within the various segments of the nephron is still to be determined. However, these channels could certainly be responsible for recycling K+ across the basolateral membrane, and for maintaining an ion potential gradient, which serves to drive Na+ secretion in the nephron[24]. Additionally, it seems likely that Kv7.1 plays a role in K+ reabsorption, in the context of a low-K+ diet for example[25]. The pore-forming partner(s) of KCNE1 and the role of the respective channel complexes in the kidney remain unknown [26]. Finally, KCNH2 is also expressed in the kidney, although the function of its product, Kv11.1, has not yet been studied in this organ. This novel mutation in KCNH2 would be a good candidate variant to test function in-vitro studies to elucidate their possible pathogenic role.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we provided evidence that the presence of long QTc interval in patients, who are undergoing dialysis, may be an indicator of risk for SCD. We did not observe a relationship between changes in electrolyte levels and the increment in QTc observed in some patients following HD. In fact, despite using an ion-balanced hemodialysis bath, we observed similar changes in electrolytes following HD to those previously reported. This question the relevance of these electrolytes changes for prolongation of the QT interval in HD. The presence of a prolonged QT interval was associated with the identification of pathogenic genetic variants in ion channels, especially in those ESRD patients who presented with a prolonged QT interval only after HD (NLQTc group). In addition, 3 out of 5 individuals in this group died suddenly. This raises the hypothesis that there may be a genetic predisposition to sudden cardiac death which may be identified by electrocardiographic and/or genetic investigation.

Clinical data for all 111 studied cases.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Electrolyte levels of the entire cohort and the sequenced groups.

*P value<0.05. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Classification and duration in the study of the 111 studied cases.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

QTc values and electrolyte levels of the entire cohort for alive and deceased patients at the end of the study.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.

Variants of uncertain significance.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  26 in total

1.  dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation.

Authors:  S T Sherry; M H Ward; M Kholodov; J Baker; L Phan; E M Smigielski; K Sirotkin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Changes in the corrected QT interval and corrected QT dispersion during haemodialysis.

Authors:  M Howse; S Sastry; G M Bell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Changes in QT intervals in patients with end-stage renal disease before and after hemodialysis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Malhis; Sami Al-Bitar; Saleh Farhood; Khair Al-Deen Zaiat
Journal:  Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl       Date:  2010-05

Review 5.  Potassium channels in renal epithelial transport regulation.

Authors:  F Lang; W Rehwald
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 6.  Beta-blocker therapy for long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: Are all beta-blockers equivalent?

Authors:  Michael J Ackerman; Silvia G Priori; Anne M Dubin; Peter Kowey; Nicholas J Linker; David Slotwiner; John Triedman; George F Van Hare; Michael R Gold
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 7.  Basolateral membrane K+ channels in renal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Kirk L Hamilton; Daniel C Devor
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2012-02-15

8.  Spectrum and prevalence of cardiac sodium channel variants among black, white, Asian, and Hispanic individuals: implications for arrhythmogenic susceptibility and Brugada/long QT syndrome genetic testing.

Authors:  Michael J Ackerman; Igor Splawski; Jonathan C Makielski; David J Tester; Melissa L Will; Katherine W Timothy; Mark T Keating; Gregg Jones; Monica Chadha; Christopher R Burrow; J Claiborne Stephens; Chuanbo Xu; Richard Judson; Mark E Curran
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  UniProt Knowledgebase: a hub of integrated protein data.

Authors:  Michele Magrane
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.451

10.  QT Interval and QT Dispersion in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Revisiting the Old Theory.

Authors:  Mohamed A Alabd; Walid El-Hammady; Ahmed Shawky; Wail Nammas; Mohamed El-Tayeb
Journal:  Nephron Extra       Date:  2011-07-09
View more
  4 in total

1.  The Contribution of Known Familial Cardiovascular Disease Genes to Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Tae-Hwi Schwantes-An; Matteo Vatta; Marco Abreu; Leah Wetherill; Howard J Edenberg; Tatiana M Foroud; Glenn M Chertow; Sharon M Moe
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.360

2.  The ketogenic diet and the QT interval.

Authors:  Sivakumar Sudhakaran; Laila Yazdani; Kevin R Wheelan; Praveen K Rao
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-10-11

3.  Enhanced Klotho availability protects against cardiac dysfunction induced by uraemic cardiomyopathy by regulating Ca2+ handling.

Authors:  José Alberto Navarro-García; Angélica Rueda; Tatiana Romero-García; Jennifer Aceves-Ripoll; Elena Rodríguez-Sánchez; Laura González-Lafuente; Carlos Zaragoza; María Fernández-Velasco; Makoto Kuro-O; Luis M Ruilope; Gema Ruiz-Hurtado
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  The anti-aging factor Klotho protects against acquired long QT syndrome induced by uremia and promoted by fibroblast growth factor 23.

Authors:  José Alberto Navarro-García; Rafael Salguero-Bodes; Laura González-Lafuente; Laura Martín-Nunes; Elena Rodríguez-Sánchez; Teresa Bada-Bosch; Eduardo Hernández; Evangelina Mérida-Herrero; Manuel Praga; Jorge Solís; Fernando Arribas; Héctor Bueno; Makoto Kuro-O; María Fernández-Velasco; Luis Miguel Ruilope; Carmen Delgado; Gema Ruiz-Hurtado
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 8.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.