Literature DB >> 30020861

Impact of a spleen registry on optimal post-splenectomy vaccination and care.

Sarah Luu1, Claire Dendle2,3, Penelope Jones4, Samar Ojaimi2,3,5,6, Ian J Woolley2,3,4.   

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate quality of patient knowledge and rates of adherence to guidelines amongst splenectomised patients registered to the Spleen Australia registry. Method: Registrants recruited for assessment of residual splenic function post-splenectomy also underwent an assessment of quality of knowledge and a review of their long-term management. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age, registered to the Spleen Australia clinical registry and had been splenectomised at least 1 year prior to their visit. Quality of knowledge was assessed using a validated questionnaire used in similar studies. Receipt of immunisations was validated by record review. Chemoprophylaxis use was self-reported by patients. Adherence was evaluated using Australian guidelines.
Results: 77 patients were evaluated for education and adherence. 58% were female, mean age was 58 years, and median duration since splenectomy was 14 years. Most common indications for splenectomy were trauma and haematological conditions. 77% had good knowledge of key educational points to reduce chances of infection. Adherence to immunisations varied with poor adherence to vaccines introduced after 2010. Only 6 patients were adherent to all recommended immunisations. Increasing duration since registration was associated with poorer 13vPCV (p = 0.008) and 4vMenCV adherence (p = 0.001). Over 70% either currently or had previously used daily chemoprophylaxis and 66% had a supply of emergency antibiotics. Conclusions: Although registrants are receiving initial and booster vaccinations, they do not receive newly recommended vaccines. In order to maintain long-term adherence, we recommend streamlining health information systems, improving awareness strategies and improving financial access to vaccinations in the community with additional awareness of the activities of the registry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spleen; adherence; asplenia; education; immunisation; registry; splenectomy; vaccine

Year:  2018        PMID: 30020861      PMCID: PMC6343612          DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1498282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  27 in total

Review 1.  Detection, education and management of the asplenic or hyposplenic patient.

Authors:  M L Brigden
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.292

2.  Re: Published article--Patient knowledge of the risks of post-splenectomy sepsis ANZ J. Surg. 2008; 78: 867-70.

Authors:  Penelope Jones; Karin Leder; Ian J Woolley; Paul Cameron; Denis Spelman
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  Compliance with Australian splenectomy guidelines in patients undergoing post-traumatic splenectomy at a tertiary centre.

Authors:  Ravindra Dotel; Iain B Gosbell; Ann Hofmeyr
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Splenectomy sequelae: an analysis of infectious outcomes among adults in Victoria.

Authors:  Claire Dendle; Vijaya Sundararajan; Tim Spelman; Damien Jolley; Ian Woolley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 7.738

5.  Understanding of the significance and health implications of asplenia in a cohort of patients with haemaglobinopathy: possible benefits of a spleen registry.

Authors:  Chamath Premawardena; Donald Bowden; Zane Kaplan; Claire Dendle; Ian John Woolley
Journal:  Hematology       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.269

6.  Vaccination coverage and mortality after splenectomy: results from an Italian single-centre study.

Authors:  Antonio Di Sabatino; Marco Vincenzo Lenti; Francesco Paolo Tinozzi; Marina Lanave; Ivana Aquino; Catherine Klersy; Piero Marone; Carlo Marena; Andrea Pietrabissa; Gino Roberto Corazza
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.397

7.  Postsplenectomy vaccination guideline adherence: Opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Ruth M Carrico; Linda Goss; Jodi Wojcik; Kimberly Broughton-Miller; Karina Pentecost; Michelle Frisbie; Stanley Kotey; Deborah Niyongabo; Matthew Benns; Anupama Raghuram; M Cynthia Logsdon
Journal:  J Am Assoc Nurse Pract       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 1.165

8.  Late septic complications in adults following splenectomy for trauma: a prospective analysis in 144 patients.

Authors:  J B Green; S R Shackford; M J Sise; P Fridlund
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1986-11

9.  Overwhelming postsplenectomy infection: is quality of patient knowledge enough for prevention?

Authors:  Mohsen Saleh El-Alfy; Manal Hamdy El-Sayed
Journal:  Hematol J       Date:  2004

10.  Postsplenectomy Prophylaxis: A Persistent Failure to Meet Standard?

Authors:  Alexander David Jones; Mashuk Khan; James Cheshire; Douglas Bowley
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.835

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Post-splenectomy sepsis: preventative strategies, challenges, and solutions.

Authors:  Sarah Luu; Denis Spelman; Ian J Woolley
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.003

2.  The Impact of Standardized Infectious Diseases Consultation on Postsplenectomy Care and Outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew J Hale; Benjamin Depo; Sundas Khan; Timothy J Whitman; Sean Bullis; Devika Singh; Katherine Peterson; Peter Hyson; Laura Catoe; Bradley J Tompkins; W Kemper Alston; Jean Dejace
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.423

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.