Kimberley M Mallan1,2, Elena Jansen2,3, Holly Harris2,3,4, Clare Llewellyn5, Alison Fildes5,6, Lynne A Daniels2,3. 1. School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University. 2. School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology. 3. Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland, Australia. 4. School of Public Health, The University of Queensland. 5. Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London. 6. School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane.
Abstract
Objective: Child fussy eating has been associated with a range of maternal feeding practices; however, whether effects are parent-driven, child-driven, or bidirectional (i.e., both) remains unclear. This study tested for bidirectional relationships between nonresponsive and structure-related maternal feeding practices and child fussy eating at age 2, 3.7, and 5 years using a cross-lagged model approach. Methods: First-time Australian mothers (N = 207) reported four nonresponsive and four structure-related feeding practices and child food fussiness (FF) using validated questionnaires at child age 2, 3.7, and 5 years. Bivariate cross-lagged analyses were conducted for each of the eight feeding practices separately. Results: Both child- and parent-driven associations were observed. Higher FF at 3.7 years predicted higher nonresponsive feeding practices and less structure-related practices at 5 years. Higher structure-related practices at 2 and 3.7 years predicted lower FF at 3.7 and 5 years, respectively. Use of food as a reward for behavior at 3.7 years predicted higher FF at 5 years. Conclusions: Both parent- and child-driven associations explain the relationship between fussy eating and feeding practices. Given that early fussy eating is associated with more nonresponsive feeding, providing parents with anticipatory guidance to manage fussy eating behavior in infants and toddlers may help to avoid the use of these practices. Furthermore, the use of structure-related feeding practices and avoiding the use of food rewards may help to prevent the development of fussy eating.
Objective: Child fussy eating has been associated with a range of maternal feeding practices; however, whether effects are parent-driven, child-driven, or bidirectional (i.e., both) remains unclear. This study tested for bidirectional relationships between nonresponsive and structure-related maternal feeding practices and child fussy eating at age 2, 3.7, and 5 years using a cross-lagged model approach. Methods: First-time Australian mothers (N = 207) reported four nonresponsive and four structure-related feeding practices and childfood fussiness (FF) using validated questionnaires at child age 2, 3.7, and 5 years. Bivariate cross-lagged analyses were conducted for each of the eight feeding practices separately. Results: Both child- and parent-driven associations were observed. Higher FF at 3.7 years predicted higher nonresponsive feeding practices and less structure-related practices at 5 years. Higher structure-related practices at 2 and 3.7 years predicted lower FF at 3.7 and 5 years, respectively. Use of food as a reward for behavior at 3.7 years predicted higher FF at 5 years. Conclusions: Both parent- and child-driven associations explain the relationship between fussy eating and feeding practices. Given that early fussy eating is associated with more nonresponsive feeding, providing parents with anticipatory guidance to manage fussy eating behavior in infants and toddlers may help to avoid the use of these practices. Furthermore, the use of structure-related feeding practices and avoiding the use of food rewards may help to prevent the development of fussy eating.
Authors: Katherine N Balantekin; Stephanie Anzman-Frasca; Lori A Francis; Alison K Ventura; Jennifer O Fisher; Susan L Johnson Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2020-09-03 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Megan H Pesch; Katherine W Bauer; Mary J Christoph; Nicole Larson; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Ariel A Jordan; Danielle P Appugliese; Alison L Miller; Julie C Lumeng; Katherine L Rosenblum; Megan H Pesch Journal: Appetite Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Jennifer S Savage; Cara F Ruggiero; Sally G Eagleton; Michele E Marini; Holly A Harris Journal: Appetite Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Pauline W Jansen; Ivonne P M Derks; Yuchan Mou; Elisabeth H M van Rijen; Romy Gaillard; Nadia Micali; Trudy Voortman; Manon H J Hillegers Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2020-06-16 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Natalie Campbell; Michèle Verdonck; Libby Swanepoel; Laine Chilman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-17 Impact factor: 3.390