Ariel A Jordan1, Danielle P Appugliese2, Alison L Miller3, Julie C Lumeng4, Katherine L Rosenblum5, Megan H Pesch6. 1. Morehouse School of Medicine, 720 Westview Dr SW, Atlanta, GA, 30310, USA. Electronic address: ajordan@msm.edu. 2. Appugliese Professional Advisors, P. O. Box 71, North Easton, MA, 02334, USA. Electronic address: dpappugliese@gmail.com. 3. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Electronic address: alimill@umich.edu. 4. Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 300 N. Ingalls Street, 10th Floor, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5406, USA. Electronic address: jlumeng@umich.edu. 5. Department of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan. 4250 Plymouth Road, Rachel Upjohn Building, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. Electronic address: katier@umich.edu. 6. Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 300 N. Ingalls Street, 1111 SE, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5456, USA. Electronic address: pesch@umich.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unknown if using different maternal prompting types is associated with vegetable intake in children perceived to be picky versus non-picky. OBJECTIVES: 1) To test the correlation of counts of maternal prompting types with child vegetable intake, and picky eating, 2) to examine the interaction of prompting types and picky eating status on vegetable intake. DESIGN/ METHODS: Low-income mother-child dyads (N = 199, mean child age 6.0 years) participated in a videotaped laboratory eating protocol with green beans, a familiar vegetable. A coding scheme was developed and reliably applied to categorize mothers' prompting types. The prompting types were: Coercive Control (Sub-Categories: Reward and Pressure-to-Eat), Autonomy Promotion (Sub-Categories: Modeling, Reasoning, Praise, and Question), and Total Prompts (sum of all prompts). Mothers completed questionnaires. Bivariate analyses tested the association between counts of maternal prompting types with amount of green beans eaten, and picky eating. Regression analyses examined the interaction of picky eating status with counts of maternal prompting type on amount of green beans eaten. RESULTS: Mothers used on average 1.66 prompts. Greater use of Coercive Control, Autonomy Promotion-Modeling, and Total Prompts were all inversely correlated with amount of green beans eaten. Greater use of Autonomy Promotion-Praise was directly correlated with amount of green beans eaten. In stratified models, greater use of Coercive Control prompts was negatively associated with amount of green beans eaten by the child in non-picky eaters, but not in picky eaters. There was no interaction between other prompting types and child picky eating status in predicting amount eaten. All p-values <0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers use different prompting types to encourage their children to eat vegetables depending on their picky eating status, most of which may be correlated with reduced intake.
BACKGROUND: It is unknown if using different maternal prompting types is associated with vegetable intake in children perceived to be picky versus non-picky. OBJECTIVES: 1) To test the correlation of counts of maternal prompting types with child vegetable intake, and picky eating, 2) to examine the interaction of prompting types and picky eating status on vegetable intake. DESIGN/ METHODS: Low-income mother-child dyads (N = 199, mean childage 6.0 years) participated in a videotaped laboratory eating protocol with green beans, a familiar vegetable. A coding scheme was developed and reliably applied to categorize mothers' prompting types. The prompting types were: Coercive Control (Sub-Categories: Reward and Pressure-to-Eat), Autonomy Promotion (Sub-Categories: Modeling, Reasoning, Praise, and Question), and Total Prompts (sum of all prompts). Mothers completed questionnaires. Bivariate analyses tested the association between counts of maternal prompting types with amount of green beans eaten, and picky eating. Regression analyses examined the interaction of picky eating status with counts of maternal prompting type on amount of green beans eaten. RESULTS: Mothers used on average 1.66 prompts. Greater use of Coercive Control, Autonomy Promotion-Modeling, and Total Prompts were all inversely correlated with amount of green beans eaten. Greater use of Autonomy Promotion-Praise was directly correlated with amount of green beans eaten. In stratified models, greater use of Coercive Control prompts was negatively associated with amount of green beans eaten by the child in non-picky eaters, but not in picky eaters. There was no interaction between other prompting types and child picky eating status in predicting amount eaten. All p-values <0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers use different prompting types to encourage their children to eat vegetables depending on their picky eating status, most of which may be correlated with reduced intake.
Authors: Megan H Pesch; Danielle P Appugliese; Niko Kaciroti; Katherine L Rosenblum; Alison L Miller; Julie C Lumeng Journal: Appetite Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: E E Antoniou; A Roefs; S P J Kremers; A Jansen; J S Gubbels; E F C Sleddens; C Thijs Journal: J Hum Nutr Diet Date: 2015-05-19 Impact factor: 3.089