Literature DB >> 30020121

Clinical Evaluation of Synovial Alpha Defensin and Synovial C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

William Z Stone1, Chancellor F Gray1, Hari K Parvataneni1, Mamun Al-Rashid1, Richard G Vlasak1, MaryBeth Horodyski1, Hernan A Prieto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty is often challenging. The alpha defensin test has been recently reported as a promising diagnostic test for periprosthetic joint infection. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of alpha defensin testing.
METHODS: One hundred and eighty-three synovial alpha defensin and synovial fluid C-reactive protein (CRP) tests performed in 183 patients undergoing evaluation for periprosthetic joint infection were reviewed. Results were compared with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for periprosthetic joint infection.
RESULTS: Alpha defensin tests were performed prior to surgical treatment for infection, and 37 of these patients who had these tests were diagnosed by MSIS criteria as having infections. Among this group, the alpha defensin test had a sensitivity of 81.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8% to 92.0%) and a specificity of 95.9% (95% CI, 91.3% to 98.5%). There were 6 false-positive results, 4 of which were associated with metallosis. There were 7 false negatives, all of which were associated with either draining sinuses (n = 3) or low-virulence organisms (n = 4). A combined analysis of alpha defensin and synovial fluid CRP tests was performed in which a positive result was represented by a positive alpha defensin test and a positive synovial fluid CRP test (n = 28). Among this group, the sensitivity was calculated to be 73.0% (95% CI, 55.9% to 86.2%) and the specificity was calculated to be 99.3% (95% CI, 96.2% to 99.9%). An additional combined analysis was performed where a positive result was represented by a positive alpha defensin test or positive synovial fluid CRP test (n = 64). Among this group, the sensitivity was calculated to be 91.9% (95% CI, 78.1% to 98.3%) and the specificity was calculated to be 79.5% (95% CI, 72.0% to 85.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Alpha defensin in combination with synovial fluid CRP demonstrates very high sensitivity for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection, but may yield false-positive results in the presence of metallosis or false-negative results in the presence of low-virulence organisms. When both alpha defensin and synovial fluid CRP tests are positive, there is a very high specificity for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30020121     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of fluoroscopy-guided hip aspiration for periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Thanat Kanthawang; Jannis Bodden; Gabby B Joseph; Thomas Vail; Derek Ward; Rina Patel; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  New developments and future challenges in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Benjamin F Ricciardi; Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan; Elysia A Masters; Nathan Kaplan; John L Daiss; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  CORR Insights®: Plasma D-dimer Does Not Anticipate the Fate of Reimplantation in Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Does the Alpha Defensin ELISA Test Perform Better Than the Alpha Defensin Lateral Flow Test for PJI Diagnosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Jesse W P Kuiper; Steven J Verberne; Stan J Vos; Pim W van Egmond
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Gout After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel J Chernoff; Jordan P Barker; Scott A Wingerter; Thomas L Shriwise
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-04-08

6.  Preliminary evaluation of a rapid lateral flow calprotectin test for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Alexander J Trotter; Rachael Dean; Celia E Whitehouse; Jarle Mikalsen; Claire Hill; Roxanne Brunton-Sim; Gemma L Kay; Majeed Shakokani; Alexander Z E Durst; John Wain; Iain McNamara; Justin O'Grady
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  Reliability of synovial fluid alpha-defensin and leukocyte esterase in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yisheng Chen; Xueran Kang; Jie Tao; Yunpeng Zhang; Chenting Ying; Weiwei Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Soluble Pecam-1 as a Biomarker in Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Michael Fuchs; Andrej Trampuz; Stephanie Kirschbaum; Tobias Winkler; F Andrea Sass
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  The accuracy of D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Renwei Wang; Hui Zhang; Peng Ding; Qiang Jiao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.