| Literature DB >> 30018505 |
YoungHo Shim1, JinSoo Kim2, Abdolreza Hosseindoust2, YoHan Choi2, MinJu Kim2, SeungMin Oh2, HyungBin Ham2, Alip Kumar2, KwangYeol Kim2, Aera Jang3, ByungJo Chae2.
Abstract
The present study investigated the effects of feed form and distiller's dried grain with solubles (DDGS) on meat quality and fatty acids profile of broiler chickens. A total of 720 broilers (Ross 308; average BW [body weight] 541±5.7 g) were randomly allotted to six treatments. Birds were fed three different feed forms (mash; SP, simple pellet; EP, expanded pellet) and DDGS (0 or 200 g kg-1) in a 3×2 factorial arrangement. The addition of DDGS and EP to the diet resulted in increased shear force of breast meat. Moreover, DDGS inclusion in the diet reduced the concentration of stearic acid and behenic acid in thigh meat. Pelleting (SP and EP) of the diets increased palmitic acid content in the thigh, whereas the linolenic acid content decreased. The breast mass was higher with EP and SP diets than with the mash diet. Feed processing led to increased pectoralis muscle and drum mass compared to mash-fed chickens. In conclusion, our results demonstrated that EP decreased thigh linolenic acid and meat shear force. In addition, DDGS supplementation in broiler hampers meat quality by increasing the shear force.Entities:
Keywords: broiler chicken; expansion; fatty acids profile; feed processing; pellet
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018505 PMCID: PMC6048368 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2018.38.3.629
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Effects of feed processing on chicken breast meat quality from broiler diets with or without distiller’s dried grain with solubles (DDGS) for 21 d
| Items | DDGS (g kg–1) | SEM | Feed processing (FP) | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 200 | M | SP | EP | FP | D | FP×D | |||
| Drip loss (%) | 26.9 | 27.0 | 0.26 | 27.4 | 27.0 | 26.5 | 0.32 | 0.120 | 0.875 | 0.777 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 15.6 | 15.7 | 0.34 | 16.1 | 15.6 | 15.3 | 0.42 | 0.443 | 0.783 | 0.615 |
| Shear force (kg·f) | 2.18 | 2.27 | 0.02 | 2.15b | 2.23ab | 2.29a | 0.03 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.257 |
| CIE L* | 52.7 | 51.8 | 0.51 | 51.4b | 53.6a | 51.7ab | 0.62 | 0.037 | 0.249 | 0.020 |
| CIE a* | 5.45 | 5.76 | 0.31 | 5.38 | 5.55 | 5.90 | 0.37 | 0.612 | 0.471 | 0.872 |
| CIE b* | 15.5 | 15.3 | 0.45 | 14.9 | 15.4 | 15.9 | 0.55 | 0.433 | 0.807 | 0.502 |
| pH 15min | 6.66 | 6.73 | 0.04 | 6.71 | 6.69 | 6.71 | 0.05 | 0.935 | 0.245 | 0.653 |
Values with different superscripts with in a same row significantly differ (p<0.05).
M, mash; SP, simple pellet; EP, expanded pellet; SEM, standard error of means; FP, feed processing; D, distiller’s dried grain with solubles.
Effects of feed processing on fatty acid profile of thigh meat in broiler diets with or without distiller’s dried grain with solubles (DDGS) for 21 d
| Items (%) | DDGS (g kg–1) | SEM | Feed processing | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 200 | M | SP | EP | FP | D | FP×D | |||
| Octanoic (C8:0) | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.006 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.008 | 0.362 | 0.877 | 0.182 |
| Decanoic (C10:0) | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.005 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.006 | 0.087 | 0.738 | 0.069 |
| Lauric (C12:0) | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.007 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.009 | 0.394 | 0.151 | 0.886 |
| Myristic (C14:0) | 1.31 | 1.34 | 0.022 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.31 | 0.026 | 0.519 | 0.278 | 0.265 |
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 23.3 | 22.6 | 0.34 | 21.7b | 23.6a | 23.5a | 0.42 | <0.01 | 0.180 | 0.477 |
| Palmitoleic (C16:1c) | 5.79 | 5.57 | 0.110 | 5.55 | 5.68 | 5.81 | 0.131 | 0.384 | 0.154 | 0.082 |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 8.53 | 8.06 | 0.130 | 8.32 | 8.25 | 8.32 | 0.162 | 0.951 | 0.016 | 0.964 |
| Oleic (C18:1c9) | 37.8 | 37.8 | 0.33 | 37.9 | 37.7 | 37.9 | 0.40 | 0.901 | 0.981 | 0.788 |
| Linoleic (C18:2n-6) | 22.1 | 23.0 | 0.48 | 22.8 | 22.9 | 22.1 | 0.59 | 0.521 | 0.225 | 0.920 |
| Linolenic (C18:3n-3) | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.015 | 0.97a | 0.92ab | 0.90b | 0.019 | 0.035 | 0.250 | 0.111 |
| Arachidonic (C20:4n-6) | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.004 | 0.10 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.005 | 0.556 | 0.138 | 0.391 |
| Behenic (C22:0) | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.008 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.009 | 0.355 | 0.013 | 0.775 |
| Erucic (C22:1) | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.005 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.006 | 0.060 | 0.321 | 0.881 |
| Lignoceric (C24:0) | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.043 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.40 | 0.053 | 0.938 | 0.556 | 0.962 |
Values with different superscripts with in a same row significantly differ (p<0.05).
M, mash; SP, simple pellet; EP, expanded pellet; SEM, standard error of means; FP, feed processing; D, distiller’s dried grain with solubles.
Effects of feed processing on meat portions weight (% of live weight at processing basis) in broiler diets with or without distiller’s dried grain with solubles (DDGS) for 21 d
| Items | DDGS (g kg–1) | SEM | Feed processing | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 200 | M | SP | EP | FP | D | FP×D | |||
| Carcass weight | 63.5 | 63.2 | 0.70 | 62.3 | 62.9 | 64.8 | 0.86 | 0.123 | 0.721 | 0.478 |
| Pectoralis muscle | 21.6 | 21.1 | 0.47 | 19.7b | 21.7a | 22.7a | 0.58 | <0.01 | 0.430 | 0.474 |
| Supracoracoideus | 2.39 | 2.54 | 0.090 | 2.64 | 2.28 | 2.48 | 0.117 | 0.099 | 0.263 | 0.140 |
| Total breast | 24.0 | 23.1 | 0.36 | 22.1b | 24.0a | 24.6a | 0.44 | <0.01 | 0.085 | 0.705 |
| Breast skin | 2.40 | 2.50 | 0.061 | 2.46 | 2.31 | 2.49 | 0.076 | 0.476 | 0.378 | 0.668 |
| Abdominal fat | 1.61 | 1.53 | 0.078 | 1.45 | 1.59 | 1.67 | 0.096 | 0.244 | 0.477 | 0.826 |
| Thigh | 18.2 | 18.3 | 0.33 | 18.1 | 18.9 | 17.8 | 0.40 | 0.164 | 0.871 | 0.052 |
| Drum | 12.9 | 13.2 | 0.27 | 12.6b | 12.7b | 13.9a | 0.33 | 0.020 | 0.564 | 0.131 |
| Wing | 7.97 | 8.50 | 0.26 | 8.20 | 8.29 | 8.18 | 0.321 | 0.968 | 0.175 | 0.084 |
| Back | 20.7 | 21.8 | 0.33 | 20.3b | 21.5ab | 21.9a | 0.41 | 0.018 | 0.035 | 0.217 |
Values with different superscripts with in a same row significantly differ (p<0.05).
M, mash; SP, simple pellet; EP, expanded pellet; SEM, standard error of means; FP, feed processing; D, distiller’s dried grain with solubles.