| Literature DB >> 30018206 |
Aamir Iqbal1, Ayesha Murtaza2, Zafarullah Muhammad3, Abdeen E Elkhedir4, Mingfang Tao5, Xiaoyun Xu6,7.
Abstract
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) causes the browning reaction in fruits and vegetables and deteriorates the quality. Thermal treatment for enzyme inactivation may result in defects as opposed to high pressure CO₂ (HPCD) processing. In this study, the changes in activity, dissociation, aggregation and conformation of purified PPO from thermal and HPCD treated juice were investigated. HPCD exhibited inactivation of PPO at 55⁻65 °C whereas thermal processing alone at the same temperature resulted in PPO still showing activity. Under thermal treatment at 25 and 65 °C, the browning degree was higher (0.39 and 0.24) than for HPCD-treated juice (0.23 and 0.12). Fluorescence and circular dichroism spectral results indicated that HPCD induced large decreases in intensities, revealing a rearrangement of the secondary structure and destruction of the native configuration of the PPO molecule. The particle size distribution (PSD) pattern revealed structural modification leading to initial dissociation and subsequent aggregation of PPO after HPCD treatment. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis exhibited that molecular size of protein was 40 kDa. In conclusion, the HPCD method was found to be more effective than thermal treatment to inactivate PPO. Structural modifications provided better insights into the phenomena of activation and inactivation of PPO.Entities:
Keywords: aggregation; conformation; high pressure carbon dioxide; polyphenol oxidase; λmax
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018206 PMCID: PMC6099494 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23071743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1(A) Relative activity of PPO; (B) Color parameters (L*, a* and b*) of quince juice treated with thermal and HPCD treatment at different temperatures.
pH and brix of quince juice from thermal and HPCD treatments.
| Treatment | Temp | pH | °Brix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control (Untreated) | 4.74 ± 0.23a | 11.55 ± 0.22a | |
| Thermal-treated (20 min) | 25 | 4.75 ± 0.18a | 11.54 ± 0.18a |
| 35 | 4.73 ± 0.24a | 11.56 ± 0.2a | |
| 45 | 4.73 ± 0.13a | 11.54 ± 0.2a | |
| 55 | 4.70 ± 0.22a | 11.51 ± 0.19a | |
| 65 | 4.69 ± 0.17a | 11.49 ± 0.19a | |
| HPCD-treated (20 MPa, 20 min) | 25 | 4.23 ± 0.21ab | 11.25 ± 0.37a |
| 35 | 4.23 ± 0.23ab | 11.19 ± 0.16a | |
| 45 | 4.20 ± 0.19ab | 11.10 ± 0.15a | |
| 55 | 4.18 ± 0.14ab | 10.98 ± 0.17a | |
| 65 | 4.11 ± 0.11b | 10.92 ± 0.21a | |
Data presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation). Different letters represent significant difference among means (p ≤ 0.05).
Secondary structure contents of thermal- and HPCD-treated PPO.
| Treatments | Secondary Structure Contents | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| α-Helix (%) | β-Sheet (%) | β-Turn (%) | Random Coil (%) | PPO Activity (%) | Concentration (%) | |
| Native | 39.34 ± 1.42a | 17.9 ± 1.13d | 26.41 ± 0.59a | 16.35 ± 0.75d | 24.23 ± 0.76d | 8.57 ± 0.67b |
| 25 °C thermal | 38.96 ± 0.96b | 18.4 ± 0.78cd | 24.48 ± 0.82ab | 18.16 ± 1.12cd | 42.58 ± 1.02a | 12.78 ± 0.93a |
| 25 °C HPCD | 35.26 ± 0.78b | 20.5 ± 0.53b | 23.85 ± 0.77b | 20.39 ± 0.82c | 36.88 ± 0.64b | 4.04 ± 0.15c |
| 65 °C thermal | 30.81 ± 1.77c | 23.4 ± 0.35b | 21.21 ± 1.11c | 24.58 ± 0.66b | 29.53 ± 1.2c | 3.91 ± 0.09c |
| 65 °C HPCD | 24.11 ± 0.97d | 27.7 ± 0.77a | 18.4 ± 1.15d | 29.79 ± 0.92a | 07.40 ± 1.33e | 0.27 ± 0.015d |
Data presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation). Different letters represent significant difference among means (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2Browning degree during storage at 4 °C (A) Thermal treatment; (B) HPCD treatment of quince juice at different temperatures.
Figure 3Particle size distributions of native PPO in comparison to thermal- and HPCD-treated PPO.
Figure 4CD spectra of native PPO in comparison to thermal- and HPCD-treated (25 & 65 °C) PPO.
Figure 5Fluorescence spectra of PPO during thermal treatment at 25 and 65 °C and HPCD treatment at 25 and 65 °C and its correlation analysis during PPO inactivation.
Figure 6(I) SDS-PAGE analysis of the PPO protein: M: Marker, 1A: native PPO, 2A: 25 °C-treated protein (thermal treatment), 3A: 25 °C-treated protein (HPCD treatment), 4A: 65 °C-treated protein (thermal treatment), 5A: 65 °C-treated protein (HPCD treatment); (II) Native PAGE analysis of PPO protein: M: Marker, 1B: native PPO, 2B: 25 °C-treated protein (thermal treatment). 3B: 25 °C-treated protein (HPCD treatment), 4B: 65 °C-treated protein (thermal treatment), 5B: 65 °C-treated protein (HPCD treatment).