| Literature DB >> 30018203 |
Yan Zhuang1,2, Danlu Chen3,4, Ruiyuan Li5,6, Ziyue Chen7,8, Jun Cai9, Bin He10,11, Bingbo Gao12, Nianliang Cheng13, Yueni Huang14.
Abstract
In recent years, particulate matter (PM) pollution has increasingly affected public life and health. Therefore, crop residue burning, as a significant source of PM pollution in China, should be effectively controlled. This study attempts to understand variations and characteristics of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations and discuss correlations between the variation of PM concentrations and crop residue burning using ground observation and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. The results revealed that the overall PM concentration in China from 2013 to 2017 was in a downward tendency with regional variations. Correlation analysis demonstrated that the PM10 concentration was more closely related to crop residue burning than the PM2.5 concentration. From a spatial perspective, the strongest correlation between PM concentration and crop residue burning existed in Northeast China (NEC). From a temporal perspective, the strongest correlation usually appeared in autumn for most regions. The total amount of crop residue burning spots in autumn was relatively large, and NEC was the region with the most intense crop residue burning in China. We compared the correlation between PM concentrations and crop residue burning at inter-annual and seasonal scales, and during burning-concentrated periods. We found that correlations between PM concentrations and crop residue burning increased significantly with the narrowing temporal scales and was the strongest during burning-concentrated periods, indicating that intense crop residue burning leads to instant deterioration of PM concentrations. The methodology and findings from this study provide meaningful reference for better understanding the influence of crop residue burning on PM pollution across China.Entities:
Keywords: China; PM concentrations; correlation analysis; crop residue burning; interannual and seasonal variations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018203 PMCID: PMC6068580 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071504
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Geographical locations of seven regions in China.
Figure 2The location of ground-monitoring air quality stations.
Figure 3Extraction of crop residue burning spots in China. (a) Fire spots extracted from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fire products; (b) Croplands extracted from Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) dataset in 2015; (c) Crop residue burning spots extracted by combining MODIS fire products and LUCC dataset.
Figure 4The spatial distribution of crop residue burning and particulate matter (PM) concentrations in the different regions of China. The left column shows the spatial distribution of crop residue burning spots in mainland China. The middle and right columns show the spatial distribution of PM10 concentration and PM2.5 concentration, respectively, in China by interpolating.
Figure 5The overall variations of PM10 (a) and PM2.5 (b) concentrations in different regions of China from 2013 to 2017. The histogram represents mean PM concentration (μg/m3) and the circle refers to the difference between the annual mean PM concentration in 2017 and that in 2013.
Figure 6The 5-year variations of PM2.5/PM10 Ratio and Difference Value (PM10–PM2.5) in each region of study area.
Figure 7The characteristics and variations of PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in different regions of China from seasonal and interannual perspectives.
Figure 8Interannual variations of crop residue burning spots in different regions of study area.
Figure 9Seasonal variations of crop residue burning spots in different regions of study area.
The correlation between particulate matter (PM) concentrations and crop residue burning occurred in different regions of China during 2013 to 2017.
| CC | EC | NC | NEC | NWC | SC | SWC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman | PM10 | 0.095 ** | 0.110 ** | −0.011 | 0.218 ** | −0.027 | 0.260 ** | −0.019 |
| PM2.5 | −0.015 | 0.002 | −0.106 ** | 0.124 ** | −0.134 ** | 0.228 ** | −0.068 ** |
Note: ** p < 0.01.
Figure 10Interannual variations of correlation coefficient between PM concentrations and crop residue burning in Northeast China (NEC) and South China (SC).
Figure 11Seasonal variations of correlation coefficient between PM concentrations and crop residue burning among seven regions of China.
The seasonal variation of correlation coefficients in different regions from 2013 to 2017.
| Spring | Summer | Autumn | Winter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC | PM10 | 0.063 | 0.214 ** | 0.426 ** | 0.148 ** |
| PM2.5 | −0.056 | 0.124 ** | 0.321 ** | 0.003 | |
| EC | PM10 | 0.199 ** | 0.193 ** | 0.397 ** | 0.363 ** |
| PM2.5 | 0.125 ** | 0.153 ** | 0.255 ** | 0.283 ** | |
| NC | PM10 | 0.019 | 0.088 | 0.186 ** | −0.159 ** |
| PM2.5 | 0.035 | −0.009 | 0.040 | −0.239 ** | |
| NEC | PM10 | 0.398 ** | 0.032 | 0.486 ** | −0.132 ** |
| PM2.5 | 0.435 ** | −0.060 | 0.464 ** | −0.158 ** | |
| NWC | PM10 | −0.106 * | −0.013 | 0.139 ** | 0.186 ** |
| PM2.5 | −0.151 ** | −0.114 * | 0.087 | 0.007 | |
| SC | PM10 | 0.236 ** | 0.187 ** | 0.214 ** | 0.418 ** |
| PM2.5 | 0.177 ** | 0.180 ** | 0.194 ** | 0.391 ** | |
| SWC | PM10 | 0.179 ** | 0.130 ** | 0.068 | 0.042 |
| PM2.5 | 0.119 * | 0.023 | 0.063 | 0.091 |
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
The correlation between PM concentrations and crop residue burning occurred in different regions of China during burning-concentrated periods.
| CC | EC | NC | NEC | NWC | SC | SWC | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spearman | PM10 | 0.362 ** | 0.444 ** | 0.236 ** | 0.491 ** | 0.347 ** | 0.436 ** | 0.234 ** |
| PM2.5 | 0.335 ** | 0.404 ** | 0.044 | 0.446 ** | 0.407 ** | 0.400 ** | 0.169 * |
Note: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.