Literature DB >> 30017430

Topical Anesthesia for Endoscopic Office-based Procedures of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract.

David J Wellenstein1, Raymond A B van der Wal2, Henrieke W Schutte3, Jimmie Honings3, Frank J A van den Hoogen3, Henri A M Marres3, Robert P Takes3, Guido B van den Broek3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Over the last two decades, an increase in office-based procedures under topical anesthesia in laryngology and head and neck oncology has occurred. Adequate anesthesia in the nasal cavity, pharynx, and larynx is essential for successful performance of these procedures. Our goal is to provide an objective summary on the available local anesthetics, methods of application, local secondary effects, efficacy, and complications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive review of literature on topical anesthesia for office-based procedures in laryngology and head and neck oncology was performed.
RESULTS: Lidocaine is the most applied and investigated topical anesthetic. Topical anesthesia results in decreased sensory function without impairing motor function of the pharynx and larynx. For the nasal cavity, cotton pledgets soaked in anesthetic spray and decongestant, or anesthetic gel, are effective. For the pharynx, anesthetic spray is the most frequently used and effective method. For the larynx, applying local anesthesia through a catheter through the working channel of the endoscope or anesthetic injection through the cricothyroid membrane is effective. Studies comparing the most effective application methods for each anatomical site are lacking. Complications of topical lidocaine administration are rare.
CONCLUSIONS: By properly applying topical anesthesia to the upper aerodigestive tract, several surgical procedures in laryngology and head and neck oncology can be performed in the outpatient clinic under topical anesthesia instead of the operating room under general anesthesia. Lidocaine is the most investigated anesthetic, with adequate efficacy and few complications. Studies that determine the most effective application methods are still wanting.
Copyright © 2018 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Head and neck oncology; Larynx; Office-based procedure; Topical anesthesia; Upper aerodigestive tract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30017430     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  3 in total

1.  A preliminary report on the effect of gabapentin pretreatment on periprocedural pain during in-office posterior nasal nerve cryoablation.

Authors:  Toby O Steele; Steven G Hoshal; Minji Kim; Amarbir S Gill; Machelle Wilson; Lane D Squires; E Bradley Strong; Jeffrey D Suh
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.858

Review 2.  Novel Diagnostic Approaches for Assessment of the Clinically Negative Neck in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Daphne A J J Driessen; Tim Dijkema; Willem L J Weijs; Robert P Takes; Sjoert A H Pegge; Patrik Zámecnik; Adriana C H van Engen-van Grunsven; Tom W J Scheenen; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 3.  [Office-based phonosurgery].

Authors:  Jörg E Bohlender
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 1.284

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.