Literature DB >> 30017282

Inter- and intra-observer repeatability of aortic annulus measurements on screening CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): Implications for appropriate device sizing.

Gesine Knobloch1, Sarah Sweetman2, Carrie Bartels2, Amish Raval3, Georgio Gimelli3, Kurt Jacobson3, Lucian Lozonschi4, Takushi Kohmoto4, Satoru Osaki4, Christopher François2, Scott Nagle5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate intra- and inter-observer repeatability of aortic annulus CT measurements for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by readers with different levels of experience and evaluate the impact of different multi-reader paradigms to improve prosthesis sizing.
METHODS: 82 TAVR screening CTAs were evaluated twice by three raters with six (R1 = radiologist), three (R2 = 3D-laboratory technician) or zero (R3 = medical student) years of experience. Results were translated into hypothetical TAVR size recommendations. Intra- and inter-observer repeatability between single readers and three different multi-reader paradigms ([A]: two readers, [B]: three readers, or [C]: two readers + an optional third reader) were evaluated.
RESULTS: Intra-observer variability did not differ significantly (range: 50.1-67.8mm2). However, we found significant differences in mean inter-observer variance (p = 0.001). Multi-reader paradigms led to significantly increased precision (lower variability) for scenarios [B] and [C] (p = 0.03, p < 0.05). Compared to single readers, all multi-reader strategies clearly lowered the rate of discrepant device size categorization between repeated measurements (22-26% to 5-10%).
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic annulus CT measurements for TAVR are highly reproducible. Multi-reader strategies provide higher precision than evaluations from single readers with different levels of experience and could effectively be implemented with two readers and an optional third reader (Paradigm C) in a clinical setting.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve; Heart valve prosthesis; Reproducibility of results; Tomography, X-ray computed; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30017282      PMCID: PMC6082406          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  22 in total

1.  Aortic annulus diameter determination by multidetector computed tomography: reproducibility, applicability, and implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ronen Gurvitch; John G Webb; Ren Yuan; Mark Johnson; Cameron Hague; Alexander B Willson; Stefan Toggweiler; David A Wood; Jian Ye; Robert Moss; Christopher R Thompson; Stephan Achenbach; James K Min; Troy M Labounty; Ricardo Cury; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 11.195

2.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  CT evaluation prior to transapical aortic valve replacement: semi-automatic versus manual image segmentation.

Authors:  Borek Foldyna; Camelia Jungert; Christian Luecke; Konstantin von Aspern; Sonja Boehmer-Lasthaus; Eva Maria Rueth; Matthias Grothoff; Stefan Nitzsche; Matthias Gutberlet; Friedrich Wilhelm Mohr; Lukas Lehmkuhl
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Ganesh Athappan; Eshan Patvardhan; E Murat Tuzcu; Lars Georg Svensson; Pedro A Lemos; Chiara Fraccaro; Giuseppe Tarantini; Jan-Malte Sinning; Georg Nickenig; Davide Capodanno; Corrado Tamburino; Azeem Latib; Antonio Colombo; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Interobserver variability of CT angiography for evaluation of aortic annulus dimensions prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  C Schmidkonz; M Marwan; L Klinghammer; M Mitschke; A Schuhbaeck; M Arnold; M Lell; S Achenbach; T Pflederer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation in humans: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Samuel V Lichtenstein; Anson Cheung; Jian Ye; Christopher R Thompson; Ronald G Carere; Sanjeevan Pasupati; John G Webb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Combined assessment of aortic root anatomy and aortoiliac vasculature with dual-source CT as a screening tool in patients evaluated for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Philipp Blanke; Wulf Euringer; Tobias Baumann; Jochen Reinöhl; Christian Schlensak; Mathias Langer; Gregor Pache
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  The impact of integration of a multidetector computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ronald K Binder; John G Webb; Alexander B Willson; Marina Urena; Nicolaj C Hansson; Bjarne L Norgaard; Philippe Pibarot; Marco Barbanti; Eric Larose; Melanie Freeman; Eric Dumont; Chris Thompson; Miriam Wheeler; Robert R Moss; Tae-hyun Yang; Sergio Pasian; Cameron J Hague; Giang Nguyen; Rekha Raju; Stefan Toggweiler; James K Min; David A Wood; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Jonathon Leipsic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  CT in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Philipp Blanke; U Joseph Schoepf; Jonathon A Leipsic
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  CT-angiography-based evaluation of the aortic annulus for prosthesis sizing in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)-predictive value and optimal thresholds for major anatomic parameters.

Authors:  Florian Schwarz; Philipp Lange; Dominik Zinsser; Martin Greif; Peter Boekstegers; Christoph Schmitz; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian Kupatt; Hans C Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative TAVR Planning: How to Do It.

Authors:  Rodrigo Petersen Saadi; Ana Paula Tagliari; Eduardo Keller Saadi; Marcelo Haertel Miglioranza; Carisi Anne Polanczyck
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Fully automated measurement of aortic root anatomy using Philips HeartNavigator computed tomography software: fast, accurate, or both?

Authors:  Viktor Kočka; Lucie Bártová; Naďa Valošková; Marek Laboš; Jiří Weichet; Marek Neuberg; And Petr Toušek
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.803

3.  Discrepancy of echocardiography and computed tomography in initial assessment and 2-year follow-up for monitoring Marfan syndrome and related disorders.

Authors:  Seyd Shnayien; Petra Gehle; Nick Lasse Beetz; Tobias Daniel Trippel; Karla Philipp; Christoph Maier; Thula Walter-Rittel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.