Literature DB >> 30017219

Evaluation of Native Femoral Neck Version and Final Stem Version Variability in Patients With Osteoarthritis Undergoing Robotically Implanted Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Andrea Marcovigi1, Luigi Ciampalini2, Piergiuseppe Perazzini3, Patrizio Caldora4, Gianluca Grandi1, Fabio Catani1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined anteversion in total hip arthroplasty influences both dislocation risk and range of motion. One of its components, stem version (SV), could be dictated by many factors, from native femoral anatomy to stem geometry and surgeon's choice. In the present multicenter study, robotic technology was used to assess the influence of native femoral version on final SV and combined anteversion using a straight, uncemented stem.
METHODS: Three hundred sixty-two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty were enrolled from 3 different orthopedic centers from 2012 and 2016. All patients underwent computed tomography planning with measurement of femoral neck version (FNV) and intraoperative measurement of stem version (SV), acetabular component version (AV), and combined version (CV) with robotic instrumentation.
RESULTS: Mean FNV was 5.0° ± 9.6°, and SV was 6.4° ± 9.7°. The average difference between FNV and SV was 1.6° ± 9.8°. A moderate correlation was found between FNV and SV (R = 0.48, P < .001). SV was between 5° and 20° in 174 patients (48%). Mean CV was 28.2° ± 7.9°. A strong correlation was found between SV and CV (R = 0.89, P < .001). A significant difference in SV was found between the 3 centers (P < .001). CV was <25° in 109 patients (30.1%). Relative risk of CV < 25° was 8.6 times greater with SV < 5° (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: With the use of an uncemented, single-wedge, straight stem, SV is highly variable. Despite being moderately correlated with native FNV, SV can be partially influenced by the surgeon. A low SV could be hardly corrected, bringing high risk of low CV.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  THA; anteversion; combined version; robotics; stem; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30017219     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

1.  Distribution and outliers of anteversion of short-length cementless stem.

Authors:  Hong-Seok Kim; Young-Kyun Lee; Joo-Hyung Ha; Se Jin Park; Jung-Wee Park; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Deep learning-based 2D/3D registration of an atlas to biplanar X-ray images.

Authors:  Jeroen Van Houtte; Emmanuel Audenaert; Guoyan Zheng; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  3D Printed Guides and Preoperative Planning for Uncemented Stem Anteversion Reconstruction during Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Yingqi Zhang; Zhitao Rao; Jincheng Zhang; Shijie Li; Shimin Chang; Yeqing Sun
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Current concepts in robotic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pascal Kouyoumdjian; Jad Mansour; Chahine Assi; Jacques Caton; Sebastien Lustig; Remy Coulomb
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-11-27

5.  Abnormal Spinopelvic Motion and Spine Deformity are Associated With Native Femoral Retroversion in the Setting of Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  David G Deckey; Christian S Rosenow; Cara Lai; Zachary K Christopher; Jens T Verhey; Adam J Schwartz; Joshua S Bingham
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-09-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.