Literature DB >> 30017217

Feedback From Activity Trackers Improves Daily Step Count After Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Neill Van der Walt1, Lucy J Salmon1, Benjamin Gooden1, Matthew C Lyons1, Michael O'Sullivan1, Kaka Martina2, Leo A Pinczewski3, Justin P Roe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Commercial wrist-worn activity monitors have the potential to accurately assess activity levels and are being increasingly adopted in the general population. The aim of this study was to determine if feedback from a commercial activity monitor improves activity levels over the first 6 weeks after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: One hundred sixty-three consecutive subjects undergoing primary TKA or THA were randomized into 2 groups. Subjects received an activity tracker with the step display obscured 2 weeks before surgery and completed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). On day 1 after surgery, participants were randomized to either the "feedback (FB) group" or the "no feedback (NFB) group." The FB group was able to view their daily step count and was given a daily step goal. Participants in the NFB group wore the device with the display obscured for 2 weeks after surgery, after which time they were also able to see their daily step count but did not receive a formal step goal. The mean daily steps at 1, 2, 6 weeks, and 6 months were monitored. At 6 months after surgery, subjects repeated PROMs and daily step count collection.
RESULTS: Of the 163 subjects, 95 underwent THA and 68 underwent TKA. FB subjects had a significantly higher (P < .03) mean daily step count by 43% in week 1, 33% in week 2, 21% in week 6, and 17% at 6 months, compared with NFB. The FB subjects were 1.7 times more likely to achieve a mean 7000 steps per day than the NFB subjects at 6 weeks after surgery (P = .02). There was no significant difference between the groups in PROMs at 6 months. Ninety percent of FB and 83% of NFB participants reported that they were satisfied with the results of the surgery (P = .08). At 6 months after surgery, 70% of subjects had a greater mean daily step count compared with their preoperative level.
CONCLUSION: Subjects who received feedback from a commercial activity tracker with a daily step goal had significantly higher activity levels after hip and knee arthroplasty over 6 weeks and 6 months, compared with subjects who did not receive feedback in a randomized controlled trial. Commercial activity trackers may be a useful and effective adjunct after arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accelerometer; activity tracker; hip arthroplasty; knee arthroplasty; patient-reported outcomes; steps

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30017217     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  Predicting physical activity recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty? A longitudinal cohort study.

Authors:  Julien Lebleu; Hervé Poilvache; Philippe Mahaudens; Roel De Ridder; Christine Detrembleur
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  The role of commercially available smartphone apps and wearable devices in monitoring patients after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Constantinescu; William Pavlis; Michael Rizzo; Dennis Vanden Berge; Spencer Barnhill; Victor Hugo Hernandez
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 3.  The effectiveness of physical activity interventions using activity trackers during or after inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Marike van der Schaaf; Marike van der Leeden; Marijke E de Leeuwerk; Petra Bor; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Vincent de Groot
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 8.915

4.  Recovery of physical activity after cesarean delivery and its relationship with pain.

Authors:  Emily E Sharpe; Jessica L Booth; Timothy T Houle; Peter H Pan; Lynnette C Harris; Carol A Aschenbrenner; James C Eisenach
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Why Do People Undergo THR and What Do They Expect to Gain-A Comparison of the Views of Patients and Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Shayan Bahadori; Sarah Collard; Jonathan Mark Williams; Ian Swain
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-09-16

6.  Factors Associated With Walking in Older Medical Inpatients.

Authors:  Ruth McCullagh; Dahly Darren; N Frances Horgan; Suzanne Timmons
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-01-11

7.  Effects of physical activity interventions using wearables to improve objectively-measured and patient-reported outcomes in adults following orthopaedic surgical procedures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Hiral Master; Jordan A Bley; Rogelio A Coronado; Payton E Robinette; Daniel K White; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Kristin R Archer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Being active with a total hip or knee prosthesis: a systematic review into physical activity and sports recommendations and interventions to improve physical activity behavior.

Authors:  Yvet Mooiweer; Martin Stevens; Inge van den Akker-Scheek
Journal:  Eur Rev Aging Phys Act       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.878

9.  Effectiveness of promotion and support for physical activity maintenance post total hip arthroplasty-study protocol for a pragmatic, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial (the PANORAMA trial).

Authors:  Theresa Bieler; S Peter Magnusson; Volkert Siersma; Mie Rinaldo; Morten Torrild Schmiegelow; Torben Beck; Anne-Mette Krifa; Birgitte Hougs Kjær; Henrik Palm; Julie Midtgaard
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 2.728

10.  Behaviour change interventions to increase physical activity in hospitalised patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Nicholas F Taylor; Katherine E Harding; Amy M Dennett; Samantha Febrey; Krystal Warmoth; Abi J Hall; Luke A Prendergast; Victoria A Goodwin
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 10.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.