Narcy Arizmendi1, Chenjie Hou2, Fujiang Guo2, Yiming Li2, Marianna Kulka1,3. 1. 1 Nanotechnology Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 2. 2 School of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. 3. 3 Department of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
Dendritic cell (DC) activation induces expression of co-stimulatory surface molecules, as well as migration into secondary lymphoid organs, where they activate naïve T-cells. A family of plant derivatives, eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenes, can regulate the immune system through DC targeting due to their anti-inflammatory effects. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is involved in inhibition of inflammatory responses and induction of DCs to acquire a mucosal phenotype. Since mucosal DCs are central in innate immune responses, we hypothesized that eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenes exerted their anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting DC maturation and activation through PPARγ. This study assessed the bicyclic eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpene compounds Fukinone and 10βH-8α,12-Epidioxyeremophil-7(11)-en-8β-ol (ZYFDC21 and ZYFDC22) in the maturation and activation of mouse DC. We measured surface expression of co-stimulatory molecules by flow cytometry and cell-free supernatant cytokine production upon lipopolysaccharide stimulation by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in the presence or absence of PPARγ agonists. DCs were generated from C57BL/6 mice bone marrow cells and harvested. Cells were exposed to bicyclic eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenes ZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 in the presence or absence of synthetic PPARγ agonists (GW1929 and TGZ) or the natural PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2, followed by overnight activation with LPS. We observed differences in the upregulation of surface expression of CD86, along with TNF, IL-6, and IL-12p70 released by DCs stimulated with LPS, when using combinations of bicyclic eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenes ZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22, and PPARγ agonists, in particular the PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2. Our results indicate that bicyclic eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenes ZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 inhibit maturation and activation of DC, and this activity is augmented upon PPARγ activation.
Dendritic cell (DC) activation induces expression of co-stimulatory surface molecules, as well as migration into secondary lymphoid organs, where they activate naïve T-cells. A family of plant derivatives, eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenes, can regulate the immune system through DC targeting due to their anti-inflammatory effects. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is involved in inhibition of inflammatory responses and induction of DCs to acquire a mucosal phenotype. Since mucosal DCs are central in innate immune responses, we hypothesized that eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenes exerted their anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting DC maturation and activation through PPARγ. This study assessed the bicycliceremophilane-type petasitesesquiterpene compounds Fukinone and 10βH-8α,12-Epidioxyeremophil-7(11)-en-8β-ol (ZYFDC21 and ZYFDC22) in the maturation and activation of mouse DC. We measured surface expression of co-stimulatory molecules by flow cytometry and cell-free supernatant cytokine production upon lipopolysaccharide stimulation by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) in the presence or absence of PPARγ agonists. DCs were generated from C57BL/6 mice bone marrow cells and harvested. Cells were exposed to bicycliceremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 in the presence or absence of synthetic PPARγ agonists (GW1929 and TGZ) or the natural PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2, followed by overnight activation with LPS. We observed differences in the upregulation of surface expression of CD86, along with TNF, IL-6, and IL-12p70 released by DCs stimulated with LPS, when using combinations of bicycliceremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22, and PPARγ agonists, in particular the PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2. Our results indicate that bicycliceremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 inhibit maturation and activation of DC, and this activity is augmented upon PPARγ activation.
Sesquiterpenes have been known to have anti-inflammatory activity in a variety of
settings, showing inhibitory effects on nitric oxide production in
lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated mouse macrophages.[1-8] Some sesquiterpenes inhibit
inflammation by targeting dendritic cell (DC) maturation and activation. For
example, a sesquiterpene glycoside isolated from Kandelia
candel inhibited pro-inflammatory cytokine production from
LPS-stimulated bone marrow–derived DCs,[9] and micheliolide, a sesquiterpene lactone, inhibits the production of
interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) from LPS-stimulated primary DCs.[10] While some examples of the anti-inflammatory effects of sesquiterpene on DCs
have been demonstrated, the molecular targets of specific sesquiterpenes and their
interactions with endogenous inflammatory signaling pathways are unknown.One possible target of sesquiterpenes in many inflammatory cells is the peroxisome
proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) pathway, which plays an important role in
several cellular functions, including maturation and differentiation. PPARs were
initially identified as receptors that controlled physiological responses to dietary
intake of fatty acids.[11,12] Three PPAR subtypes have been identified, alpha, delta and
gamma, and are ligand-activated nuclear receptors which can be activated by
polyunsaturated fatty acids, eicosanoids, and various synthetic ligands. PPAR gamma
(PPARγ) is primarily expressed in adipose tissue and, to a lesser extent, in the
colon, immune system, and the retina. PPARγ was first identified as a regulator of
adipogenesis, but also plays an important role in cellular and adipocyte
differentiation, insulin sensitization, glucose metabolism, atherosclerosis, and cancer.[13] It has been shown that PPARγ ligands have anti-inflammatory effects on mast
cells, monocytes, macrophages, and DC, by modulating expression of co-stimulatory
and adhesion molecules, altering their phenotype and leading to an impaired
expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokine factors involved in T-cell
activation and recruitment.[14-18]Several sesquiterpenes or terpenoid-like compounds have been shown to either directly
activate PPARγ or to modify its response to other ligands. For example, odoratin, an
undecanortriterpenoid from Chromolaena odorata,
moderately activates PPARγ;[19] tirotundin and tagitinin A, both sesquiterpene lactones, transactivate
PPARγ-dependent promoters, including PPARγ response element (PPRE), small
heterodimer partner (SHP), and ABCA1 gene promoters in
dose-dependent manner,[20] and artemisinic acid, the quintessential sesquiterpene, reduces expression of
PPARγ in human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells.[21] Altogether, these data suggest that sesquiterpenes may similarly influence DC
function through the PPARγ pathway. Recently, our group isolated two novel
eremophilane-type sesquiterpene compounds from Petasites
tatewakianus Kitam.[2] We hypothesized that these novel sesquiterpenes would inhibit DC maturation
and activation, and that this activity would be augmented in the presence of a PPARγ
agonist. In this study, we demonstrate, for the first time, that the novel bicycliceremophilane-type petasite isolated sesquiterpenes have the ability to efficiently
inhibit DC maturation and activation, and this inhibition is potentiatedby the
synthetic, as well as naturally occurring, nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor γ agonists.
Materials and methods
Plant material
BicyclicsesquiterpenesFukinone (ZYFDC21), and
10βΗ-8α,12-Epidioxyeremophil-7(11)-en-8β-ol (ZYFDC22), were isolated and
purified from rhizome of P. tatewakianus, at the
School of Pharmacy, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine as
previously described.[22]
Generation of bone marrow DCs from C57BL/6 mice
Female C57BL/6 mice (6–10 weeks old) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory.
All mice were treated according to protocols approved by the University of
Alberta Animal Care and Use Committee. Bone marrow–derived DCs (BmDC) were
generated using a standard protocol with little modification.[23] Briefly, bone marrow was flushed dispersed and collected from femurs and
tibias of female C57BL/6 mice, passed through a 70 µm nylon mesh, and suspended
in bone marrow–derived DC-complete media (RPMI 1640 containing 5 mM
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 50 U Pen/Strep, 2 mM
glutamine, 50 µM 2-ME, 50 mM gentamycin sulfate, and 10% fetal bovine serum
(FBS)) in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
(GM-CSF) and IL-4 (10 ng/mL; PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA) and cultured in
tissue culture dishes (Thermo Fisher, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air at 37oC. All media components,
except for GM-CSF and IL-4, were obtained from Gibco (Carlsbad, CA, USA). During
culture, half of the media was replaced on days 3 and 6. On day 8, BmDC were
harvested, and their morphology was confirmed by optical microscopical analysis
(Supplementary Figure 1).
Effect of sesquiterpenes and PPARγ agonists on BmDC
Initially, 0.2 × 106 BmDC/mL were deposited, per well, in a 12-well
plate and incubated with either eremophilane-type petasitesesquiterpene,
ZYFDC21 (50 µM) and ZYFDC22 (25 µM), in the presence or absence of synthetic
PPARγ agonists troglitazone (TGZ, 5 µM or 10 µM; Sigma Aldrich Canada, Oakville,
ON, Canada) or N-(2-benzoylphenyl)-O-(2-(methyl-2-pyridinylamino)
ethyl)-L-tyrosine (GW1929, 40 µM; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI,
USA) or the physiologically relevant PPARγ natural ligand
15d-PGJ2-15deoxy-Δ[12,14]-Prostaglandin
J2 (15d-PGJ2, 0.5 µM, or 5 µM; Cayman Chemical). Cells
were then incubated for 20 h at 37°C and 5% CO2 and viability was
assessed by trypan blue exclusion (Gibco). Cells were exposed to the petasite
sesquiterpenes and synthetic and natural PPARγ ligands for 3 h and treated with
LPS for 24 h, and BmDC were >90% viable after treatment (Supplementary Figure 2). In order to determine whether the PPARγ
pathway and/or the petasite sesquiterpenes were involved in the maturation and
activation of DCs, BmDC were treated with each petasite sesquiterpenes (ZYFDC21
or ZYFDC22) or PPARγ agonists for 3 h at 37°C and 5% CO2, with or
without LPS (10 ng/mL) overnight stimulation. BmDC stimulated with LPS or
complete media alone were included as positive and negative controls,
respectively. Cell-free supernatants from the different conditions were
collected and stored at −20°C for cytokine analysis with commercial ELISAs.
Cells were fixed for 5 min in 2% formaldehyde, suspended in cold 1% bovine serum
albumin (BSA)-flow Buffer (0.05% sodium azide, 0.1% BSA in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS)), incubated overnight at 4°C, and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry of BmDC
After stimulation, 1 × 105 BmDC were incubated with their respective
conjugated antibodies for 60 min at 4°C and washed twice. Data from 30,000 cells
were collected by a CytoFlex flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea CA, USA) and
VersaComp antibody capture beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea CA, USA) were included
to generate a compensation matrix. Data analysis was performed using the FloJo
V10 LLC software (Ashland, OR, USA). Gating was initially defined based on side
scatter (SSC) versus forward scatter (FSC), BmDC positive gating was determined
using an APC-labeled Armenian Hamster anti-mouseCD11c (BD Pharmingen, San
Diego, CA, USA). CD11c+ subpopulation was then analyzed by the
expression of CD80 and CD86 surface molecules with a FITC-Armenian Hamster IgG
Anti-MouseCD80 (Affymetrix eBioscience, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and APC-Rat
anti-mouseCD86 antibodies (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA) and compared to
their respective isotype controls. Results were expressed as the median of
fluorescence intensity (MFI) ± standard error of the median (SEM).
Cytokine release analysis
Levels of TNF, IL-6, and IL-12p70 released in the cell-free supernatants were
quantified using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according
to the instructions of the ELISA Kits (Affymetrix eBiosciences). Results were
expressed as means ± SEM.
Statistical analysis
Experiments were performed in triplicate, with BmDC obtained from at least three
biological replicates (n ⩾ 3). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. All
statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism statistical (GraphPad,
Sand Diego, CA, USA). Statistical differences in the mean values among treatment
groups were determined by using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with
post hoc analysis with Tukey’s multiple comparison tests. In all cases, a value
for P < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant.
Results
PPARγ activation inhibits DC maturation
In order to determine whether PPARγ agonists modified the maturation of DC, we
first analyzed the surface expression of the maturation markers CD80 and CD86 on
BmDC by flow cytometry. Figure
1(a) shows that BmDC exposed to different concentrations of synthetic
PPARγ agonists TGZ (5 and 10 µM) or GW1929 (40 µM) presented CD86 MFI levels
similar to control untreated cells; yet LPS stimulation induced upregulation of
the co-stimulatory molecule CD86 on BmDC (MFI 31431 ± 7316, n = 5).
Interestingly, when the BmDC were pretreated with the synthetic PPARγ agonists
TGZ (5 or 10 µM) or GW1929 (40 µM) for 3 h followed by 20 h stimulation with
LPS, there was a significant 75%–80% inhibition in the CD86 surface expression
on BmDC compared to the LPS stimulation alone (MFI 6563 ± 1938 and MFI
5989 ± 2072 for TGZ 5 and 10 µM and 7459 ± 2317 for GW1929, respectively;
n = 5). Expression of CD80- and CD86-positive BmDC after each treatment is shown
in the supplementary Figure 3 as percentage values. We also examined
the expression of CD80 after BmDC were exposed to the synthetic PPARγ agonists,
followed by LPS overnight stimulation. We observed a 12%–20% inhibition in the
expression of CD80 when cells were pretreated with TGZ or GW1929 (Figure 1(b)).
Figure 1.
PPARγ activation inhibits DC maturation and cytokine secretion. CD86
surface expression in BmDC after 3 h preincubation with PPARγ agonists
TGZ (5 and 10 µM), GW1929 (40 µM), and 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 and
5 µM) followed by LPS overnight stimulation was examined by flow
cytometry. (a) CD86 results and (b) CD80 results are expressed as
differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS activated-BmDC and PPARγ
agonists ± LPS (n = 3–5; **P < 0.01 and
***P < 0.001). BmDC were incubated
with PPARγ agonist TGZ (5 and 10 µM), GW1929 (40 µM), and
15d-PGJ2 (0.5 and 5 µM) for 3 h ± LPS overnight
stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and tested for
(c) TNF, (d) IL-6, or (e) IL-12p70 release by ELISA. Results are from
cytokines released from LPS-activated BmDC and cells treated with
PPARγ agonists ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3–5;
*P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001).
PPARγ activation inhibits DC maturation and cytokine secretion. CD86
surface expression in BmDC after 3 h preincubation with PPARγ agonists
TGZ (5 and 10 µM), GW1929 (40 µM), and 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 and
5 µM) followed by LPS overnight stimulation was examined by flow
cytometry. (a) CD86 results and (b) CD80 results are expressed as
differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS activated-BmDC and PPARγ
agonists ± LPS (n = 3–5; **P < 0.01 and
***P < 0.001). BmDC were incubated
with PPARγ agonist TGZ (5 and 10 µM), GW1929 (40 µM), and
15d-PGJ2 (0.5 and 5 µM) for 3 h ± LPS overnight
stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and tested for
(c) TNF, (d) IL-6, or (e) IL-12p70 release by ELISA. Results are from
cytokines released from LPS-activated BmDC and cells treated with
PPARγ agonists ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3–5;
*P < 0.05 and ***P < 0.001).
Natural PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2 modulates DC maturation
The cyclopentenone metabolite of PGJ2, 15d-PGJ2, is a
naturally occurring derivative of prostaglandin D2 (PGD2)
and has been shown to directly activate PPARγ[24-26] BmDC were preincubated
with 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 or 5 µM) for 3 h, and as shown in Figure 1(a),
15d-PGJ2 alone had no effect on the expression of CD86 at either
of the concentrations tested. 15d-PGJ2 treatment for 3 h
significantly decreased LPS-induced expression of CD86 by 60% and 50% (MFI
12,166 ± 1138 at 0.5 µM and 15147 ± 1376 at 5 µM; n = 3). CD80 surface
expression did not reach statistical difference (9%–17% for 0.5 and 5 µM; Figure 1(b), n = 3). BmDC
stimulated with LPS or complete media were included as positive and negative
controls, respectively.PPARγ activation promotes the inhibition of BmDC cytokine secretion. We analyzed
the effects of the activation of PPARγ on the cytokine secretion of TNF, IL-6,
and IL-12p70 released in the cell-free supernatant of BmDC, after 3 h treatment
with TGZ (5 or 10 µM) or GW1929 (40 µM) by commercial ELISAs. As shown in Figure 1(c), pre-treatment
with GW1929 significantly inhibited release of TNF (about 65% ± 5% compared to
LPS). However, under the same conditions, BmDC release of IL-6 was unaffected by
treatment with the PPARγ agonists, compared to LPS stimulation alone (Figure 1(d)). IL-12p70,
the bioactive isoform of the cytokine, was also evaluated in the cell-free
supernatants of BmDC exposed to 5 and 10 µM TGZ with and without LPS
stimulation. We found that TGZ significantly inhibited (68% ± 1% and 66% ± 2%,
respectively) IL-12p70 production, as shown in Figure 1(e).
PPARγ ligation skews BmDC cytokine response
We were interested in studying the response of BmDC to the treatment with the
natural PPARγ ligand 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 and 5 µM), and we found that BmDC
treated for 3 h with 15d-PGJ2 plus LPS inhibited TNF release by
29% ± 9% and 33% ± 9% at 0.5 and 5 µM, respectively; however, this inhibition
was not statistically significant (Figure 1(c)). IL-12p70 showed a 33% ± 5%
significant inhibition at 0.5 µM (Figure 4(c)).
Figure 4.
Petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC21 in combination with GW1929 inhibited CD86
and cytokine secretion on BmDC. BmDC were pretreated with the
eremophilane-type sesquiterpene ZYFDC21 plus PPARγ agonist GW1929
(40 μM) for 3 h, followed by LPS overnight stimulation, and DC were
collected, fixed, and analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Differences in the
CD86 surface expression are represented as differences in MFI ± SEM
between LPS-activated BmDC and ZYFDC21 + TGZ + LPS (n = 5;
***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC preincubated with ZYFDC21
plus GW1929 ± LPS overnight stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were
collected and tested for (b) TNF, (c) IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 release by
ELISA. Results are from cytokines released from LPS-activated BmDC and
compared to cells treated with ZYFDC21 plus GW1929 ± LPS. Data are
expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, and
***P < 0.001).
Bicyclic petasite eremophilane-type sesquiterpenes potentiate the effects of
PPARγ agonists on BmDC maturation and activation
Petasite sesquiterpenes have been shown to have anti-inflammatory activity in a
variety of settings. We sought to assess the effects of two petasite
eremophilane-type sesquiterpene compounds Fukinone (ZYFDC21) and
10βH-8α,12-Epidioxyeremophil-7(11)-en-8β-ol (ZYFDC22) isolated from the rhizome
of P. tatewakianus on the maturation and
activation of BmDCs. To evaluate the cytotoxic effects of the bicyclic
compounds, we performed dose-response assays with several cell lines, using the
XTT assay kit (Roche, data not shown). We selected sub-toxic doses of ZYFDC21
(50 µM) and ZYFDC22 (25 µM) and further evaluated their cytotoxic effects on
BmDC after 1, 3, 24 and 48 h incubation, measuring viability by trypan blue
exclusion (supplementary Figure 2). BmDC viability was ⩾95% under all
tested conditions, and therefore, these concentrations were used for all
experiments.There is evidence that some sesquiterpenes exert anti-diabetic,
anti-carcinogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects, mediated by the PPARγ pathway.[20] We sought to identify whether the sesquiterpenes would inhibit BmDC
maturation and activation and whether this inhibitory activity would be
augmented by the presence of a PPARγ synthetic agonist. For that purpose, BmDC
were exposed to the synthetic PPARγ agonists TGZ (5 or 10 µM) or GW1929 (40 µM)
in the presence or absence of the petasite sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 (50 µM) or
ZYFDC22 (25 µM) for 3 h, followed by the overnight LPS stimulation. First, we
assessed the effects of bicyclicsesquiterpenes on BmDC maturation by flow
cytometry. The presence of the sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 (Figure 2(a)) and ZYFDC22 (Figure 3(a)) alone induced
a modest increase in CD86 expression (MFI 6985 ± 1825 and 6882 ± 1274,
respectively) compared to control, untreated BmDC (MFI 2073 ± 510). Exposure to
a combination of ZYFDC21 (50 µM) plus the synthetic PPARγ agonist TGZ (5 or
10 µM) or GW1929 (40 µM) followed by overnight LPS stimulation resulted in a
significant downregulation in CD86 surface expression (up to 80% compared to LPS
levels alone; Figures
2(a) and 4(a)). The combination of ZYFDC22 (25 µM) with TGZ (5 or 10 µM) or
GW1929 (40 µM) followed by overnight LPS activation resulted in a significant
85% and 80% inhibition, respectively, in CD86 surface expression (Figures 3(a) and 5(a)).
Figure 2.
Bicyclic eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC21 potentiates the
effects of PPARγ agonists on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were
pretreated with the eremophilane-type sesquiterpene ZYFDC21 ± PPARγ
synthetic agonist TGZ (5 or 10 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS overnight
stimulation, and DC were collected, fixed, and analyzed by flow
cytometry. (a) Differences in the CD86 surface expression are
represented as differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS activated-BmDC and
the combination of ZYFDC21 + TGZ ± LPS (n = 5; ***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC treated with
ZYFDC21 plus PPARγ agonist TGZ (5 and 10 µM) for 3 h ± LPS overnight
stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and tested for
(b) TNF, (c) IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 release by ELISA. Results are from
cytokines released from LPS-activated BmDC, compared to BmDC cells
treated with ZYFDC21, plus TGZ ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM
(n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).
Figure 3.
Bicyclic eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC22 potentiate the
effects of PPARγ agonists on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were
pretreated with the eremophilane-type sesquiterpene ZYFDC22 plus PPARγ
synthetic agonist TGZ (5 or 10 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS overnight
stimulation, and DC were collected, fixed, and analyzed by flow
cytometry. Differences in the (a) CD86 surface expression are
represented as differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS activated–BmDC and
ZYFDC22 + TGZ + LPS (n = 5; ***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC preincubated with
ZYFDC22 and PPARγ agonist TGZ for 3 h ± LPS overnight stimulation, and
cell-free supernatants were collected and tested for (b) TNF, (c) IL-6,
or (d) IL-12p70 release by ELISA. Results are from cytokines released
from LPS-activated BmDC, compared to cells treated with
ZYFDC22 + TGZ ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, and ***P < 0.001).
Figure 5.
Petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC22 in combination with GW1929 inhibited CD86
and cytokine secretion on BmDC. BmDC were pretreated with the
eremophilane-type sesquiterpene ZYFDC22, plus GW1929 (40 µM) for 3 h,
followed by LPS overnight stimulation, DC were collected, fixed and
analyzed by flow cytometry. Differences in the CD86 surface expression
(a), are represented as differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS
activated-BmDC and ZYFDC22 + GW1929 + LPS (n = 5; ***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC
preincubated with ZYFDC22 plus GW1929 ± LPS overnight stimulation,
cell–free supernatants were collected and tested for TNF (b), IL-6 (c),
or IL-12p70 (d) release by ELISA. Results are from cytokines released
from LPS-activated BmDC, compared to cells treated with ZYFDC22 plus
GW1929 ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 5; **P < 0.001 and ***P < 0.001).
Bicycliceremophilane-type petasitesesquiterpeneZYFDC21 potentiates the
effects of PPARγ agonists on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were
pretreated with the eremophilane-type sesquiterpeneZYFDC21 ± PPARγ
synthetic agonist TGZ (5 or 10 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS overnight
stimulation, and DC were collected, fixed, and analyzed by flow
cytometry. (a) Differences in the CD86 surface expression are
represented as differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS activated-BmDC and
the combination of ZYFDC21 + TGZ ± LPS (n = 5; ***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC treated with
ZYFDC21 plus PPARγ agonist TGZ (5 and 10 µM) for 3 h ± LPS overnight
stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and tested for
(b) TNF, (c) IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 release by ELISA. Results are from
cytokines released from LPS-activated BmDC, compared to BmDC cells
treated with ZYFDC21, plus TGZ ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM
(n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).Bicycliceremophilane-type petasitesesquiterpeneZYFDC22 potentiate the
effects of PPARγ agonists on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were
pretreated with the eremophilane-type sesquiterpeneZYFDC22 plus PPARγ
synthetic agonist TGZ (5 or 10 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS overnight
stimulation, and DC were collected, fixed, and analyzed by flow
cytometry. Differences in the (a) CD86 surface expression are
represented as differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS activated–BmDC and
ZYFDC22 + TGZ + LPS (n = 5; ***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC preincubated with
ZYFDC22 and PPARγ agonist TGZ for 3 h ± LPS overnight stimulation, and
cell-free supernatants were collected and tested for (b) TNF, (c) IL-6,
or (d) IL-12p70 release by ELISA. Results are from cytokines released
from LPS-activated BmDC, compared to cells treated with
ZYFDC22 + TGZ ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, and ***P < 0.001).Petasite sesquiterpeneZYFDC21 in combination with GW1929 inhibited CD86
and cytokine secretion on BmDC. BmDC were pretreated with the
eremophilane-type sesquiterpeneZYFDC21 plus PPARγ agonist GW1929
(40 μM) for 3 h, followed by LPS overnight stimulation, and DC were
collected, fixed, and analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Differences in the
CD86 surface expression are represented as differences in MFI ± SEM
between LPS-activated BmDC and ZYFDC21 + TGZ + LPS (n = 5;
***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC preincubated with ZYFDC21
plus GW1929 ± LPS overnight stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were
collected and tested for (b) TNF, (c) IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 release by
ELISA. Results are from cytokines released from LPS-activated BmDC and
compared to cells treated with ZYFDC21 plus GW1929 ± LPS. Data are
expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, and
***P < 0.001).Petasite sesquiterpeneZYFDC22 in combination with GW1929 inhibited CD86
and cytokine secretion on BmDC. BmDC were pretreated with the
eremophilane-type sesquiterpeneZYFDC22, plus GW1929 (40 µM) for 3 h,
followed by LPS overnight stimulation, DC were collected, fixed and
analyzed by flow cytometry. Differences in the CD86 surface expression
(a), are represented as differences in MFI ± SEM between LPS
activated-BmDC and ZYFDC22 + GW1929 + LPS (n = 5; ***P < 0.001). Cytokine release by BmDC
preincubated with ZYFDC22 plus GW1929 ± LPS overnight stimulation,
cell–free supernatants were collected and tested for TNF (b), IL-6 (c),
or IL-12p70 (d) release by ELISA. Results are from cytokines released
from LPS-activated BmDC, compared to cells treated with ZYFDC22 plus
GW1929 ± LPS. Data are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 5; **P < 0.001 and ***P < 0.001).Second, we evaluated the activation of the immune response by the presence of the
pro-inflammatory mediators TNF, IL-6, and IL-12p70 released in the cell-free
supernatants of BmDC treated for 3 h with the synthetic PPARγ agonists (TGZ or
GW1929), in combination with the petasite sesquiterpene (ZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22) and
followed by LPS overnight stimulation. BmDC treated with the sesquiterpeneZYFDC21 and synthetic PPARγ agonist GW1929 and stimulated with LPS showed a
significant 43% ± 9% inhibition on TNF release (Figure 4(b)). IL-6 released values showed
that this cytokine was not significantly affected by any of the tested
treatments.In these studies, we found that IL-12p70, the bioactive isoform of IL-12, seems
to be involved in the PPARγ/petasinesesquiterpene pathway. BmDC exposed for 3 h
to the sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 in combination with synthetic PPARγ
agonists, followed by overnight stimulation with LPS showed ≥ 90% inhibition for
either sesquiterpene in combination with TGZ (5 and 10 μM). The same was true
when BmDC were treated with ZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 in combination with GW1929,
followed by stimulation with LPS, where we observed a substantial inhibition of
IL-12p70 release (75%±10% for ZYFDC21 and 64±1% for ZFDC22) (Figure 4(d)).
Petasite sesquiterpenes potentiate the effects of PGD2 metabolites
on BmDC maturation and activation
BmDC were exposed to the natural PPARγ ligand (15d-PGJ2, 0.5 and 5 µM)
for 3 h in combination with eremophilane sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 and ZYFDC22,
followed by LPS overnight stimulation. We observed a robust inhibition in the
expression of the co-stimulatory molecule CD86. Cells incubated in the presence
of 15d-PGJ2 and sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 plus LPS showed
downregulation in more than 78% ± 6% and 82% ± 6% in the expression of CD86 with
0.5 and 5 µM of 15d-PGJ2 (Figures 6(a) and 7(a) respectively). Also, when BmDC were
exposed to petasite sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 or ZYFDC22 plus LPS, there was a
50% ± 2% inhibition in the TNF release (Figures 6(b) and 7(b)). In addition, the combination of
the natural PPARγ ligand pre-treatment plus petasite sesquiterpenes and LPS
overnight stimulation promoted a modest IL-6 inhibition of 9% and 18% for
ZYFDC21 (Figure 6(c)),
but a solid 39, 60% IL-6 inhibition following a inhibitory trend with the
PPARγ ligand (Figure
7(c)), not reaching statistical significance. The natural PPARγ
agonist, 15d-PJG2, seems to have an additive inhibitory effect on the
release of IL-12, which was significantly inhibited with the combination of
sesquiterpeneZYFDC21 and 0.5 µM (54% ± 10%) or 5 µM (56% ± 10%) after LPS
stimulation (Figure
6(d)). However, when we tested the sesquiterpeneZYFDC22 in combination
of 15d-PJG2, we found a 30% ± 10% IL-12p70 inhibition at 0.5 µM and a
50% ± 10% IL-12p70 inhibition at 5 µM 15d-PJG2, respectively (Figure 7(d)). Both
sesquiterpenes were able to significantly inhibit around 35% of IL-12 release
after LPS stimulation.
Figure 6.
Petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC21 potentiates the effects of PGD2
metabolites on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were pretreated with
the eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC21 ± the natural PPARγ
ligand 15d-PGJ2 0.5 or 5 µM for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and BmDC cells were collected, fixed, and
analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Differences in the CD86 surface
expression are represented as differences in MFI between LPS-activated
BmDC and the combination of ZYFDC21 + 15d-PGJ2 + LPS (n = 5;
**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001). BmDC were pretreated with
ZYFDC21 ± 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 or 5 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and
cytokine release was analyzed by ELISA. Differences in (b) TNF, (c)
IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 released are represented as differences between
LPS activated-BmDC and ZYFDC21 plus 15d-PGJ2 ± LPS (n = 5;
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).
Figure 7.
Petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC22 potentiate the effects of PGD2
metabolites on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were pretreated with
the eremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpene ZYFDC22 ± the natural PPARγ
ligand 15d-PGJ2 0.5 or 5 µM for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and BmDC cells were collected, fixed, and
analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Differences in the CD86 surface
expression are represented as differences in MFI between LPS-activated
BmDC and the combination of ZYFDC22 + 15d-PGJ2 + LPS (n = 5;
**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001). BmDC were pretreated with
ZYFDC22 ± 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 or 5 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and
cytokine release was analyzed by ELISA. Differences in (b) TNF, (c)
IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 released are represented as differences between
LPS-activated BmDC compared to ZYFDC22 plus 15d-PGJ2 ± LPS
(n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).
Petasite sesquiterpeneZYFDC21 potentiates the effects of PGD2
metabolites on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were pretreated with
the eremophilane-type petasitesesquiterpeneZYFDC21 ± the natural PPARγ
ligand 15d-PGJ2 0.5 or 5 µM for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and BmDC cells were collected, fixed, and
analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Differences in the CD86 surface
expression are represented as differences in MFI between LPS-activated
BmDC and the combination of ZYFDC21 + 15d-PGJ2 + LPS (n = 5;
**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001). BmDC were pretreated with
ZYFDC21 ± 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 or 5 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and
cytokine release was analyzed by ELISA. Differences in (b) TNF, (c)
IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 released are represented as differences between
LPS activated-BmDC and ZYFDC21 plus 15d-PGJ2 ± LPS (n = 5;
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).Petasite sesquiterpeneZYFDC22 potentiate the effects of PGD2
metabolites on BmDC maturation and activation. BmDC were pretreated with
the eremophilane-type petasitesesquiterpeneZYFDC22 ± the natural PPARγ
ligand 15d-PGJ2 0.5 or 5 µM for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and BmDC cells were collected, fixed, and
analyzed by flow cytometry. (a) Differences in the CD86 surface
expression are represented as differences in MFI between LPS-activated
BmDC and the combination of ZYFDC22 + 15d-PGJ2 + LPS (n = 5;
**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001). BmDC were pretreated with
ZYFDC22 ± 15d-PGJ2 (0.5 or 5 µM) for 3 h, followed by LPS
overnight stimulation, and cell-free supernatants were collected and
cytokine release was analyzed by ELISA. Differences in (b) TNF, (c)
IL-6, or (d) IL-12p70 released are represented as differences between
LPS-activated BmDC compared to ZYFDC22 plus 15d-PGJ2 ± LPS
(n = 5; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001).
Discussion
DCs are the most potent antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and are involved in
initiating the adaptive immune responses. The expression of surface adhesion (CD40)
and co-stimulatory (CD80 and CD86) and major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
class-II molecules promote the contact between DCs and T-cells, while co-stimulatory
molecules signal T-cells to proliferate and differentiate.[27] In the mouse, CD86 is the main activation marker of bone marrow–derived DC,
being strongly upregulated after maturation, while CD80 expression is less relevant
for murine DC.[27,28] In this context, our studies demonstrated that LPS stimulation
upregulates CD80 and CD86 expression on BmDC. We also confirmed that the use of
synthetic (TGZ and GW1929), as well as natural (15d-PGJ2) PPARγγ ligands
decreased the expression of CD86 after LPS stimulation. Furthermore, we observed a
significant reduction on TNF cytokine release with the GW1929, while IL-12p70
production was attenuated by TGZ and PGJ2. These results were similar to
previous reports.[14-16,29-31]Advances in the investigation of plant–derived chemicals used in alternative medicine
for the treatment of several chronic diseases have shown that Petasite species from
petasite sesquiterpenes possess anti-inflammatory properties.[32-34] Due to their anti-inflammatory
effects mediated via leukotriene synthesis inhibition, sesquiterpenes have been used
for the treatment of inflammatory diseases such as arthritis, migraine, as well as
asthma and allergy.[35-37]The anti-inflammatory effect of Petasite sesquiterpenes is based on their ability to
block Ca2+ channels, decreasing intracellular Ca2+
concentration, inhibiting leukotriene B4 and cysteinyl leukotrienes synthesis in
eosinophils and neutrophils.[21,33,37-43] The active components are
sesquiterpene esters of the eremophilane type, and their bioactivity is attributed
to petasine and isopetasine.[44,45] Studies by Shimoda et al.[46] showed that the effective constituent in the extract of Petasites japonicus was petasine, which had inhibitory effects on
leukotriene synthesis[39] and bronchoconstriction.[47] Another eremophilane-type sesquiterpene ketone, namely, Fukinones (1 and 3),[48] exerted suppressive mechanisms in a type I hypersensitivity model in rats and
IgE-sensitized RBL-2H3 cells through inhibition of smooth muscle constriction and
inhibition of degranulation, leukotriene release, and TNF production by mast
cells.[33,46] In this context, Lee et al.[33] also reported anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory effects of several
compounds obtained from plants of the petasites genus in an ovalbumin-induced asthma
model; the molecule Bakkenolide B isolated from P.
japonicus inhibited the migration of eosinophils, macrophages, and
lymphocytes to the lungs. Previous studies from our lab showed that different
extracts of petasites could inhibit type I and type IV hypersensitivity inmouse
models of homogeneous and heterogeneous passive cutaneous anaphylaxis.[49]Elegant studies by Lin,[20] evaluated the agonistic activity of the sesquiterpene lactonestirotundin and
targitining A, isolated from Tithonia diversifolia
against PPARs. For this, they used a transient transfection reporter assay with
HepG2 cells and found that tirotundin and targitining A transactivate
PPARγ-dependent promoters, including PPRE (PPARγ response element), SHP, and ABCA1,
and that both sesquiterpene lactones transactivate PPARγ by binding directly to the
PPARγ ligand-binding domain (LBD). In this context, Zhang et al.[19] showed that five isolated components of C.
odorata, another plant used in traditional medicine for their
anti-inflammatory activities, had a transactivation effect on PPARγ. More recent
studies by Wu et al.[50] demonstrated by luciferase reporter assay in HEK293 cells that the bicyclicsesquiterpenetrans-caryophyllene aroma compound of plant foods and teas activates
PPARα through direct interaction with the LBD of PPARα. However, trans-caryophyllene
showed no binding affinity for or transactivation of PPARγ.However, Adachi et al.[45] demonstrated that petasin derived from P.
japonicus activates adenosine monophospahte–activated protein kinase
(AMPK) in the liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue of mice, via
phosphorylation of AMPK. AMPK activation enhanced the transcription of the
proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (PGC-1α), which regulates the genes
involved in energy metabolism including mitochondrial biogenesis.Our studies showed that the eremophilane-type sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 and ZYFDC22
increased CD80 and CD86 surface expression in non-stimulated BmDC. In contrast, when
the cells were pretreated with sesquiterpeneZYFDC21 (Fukinone) followed by LPS, we
observed a decrease in CD86 surface expression. This inhibition was amplified up to
80% by the presence of the PPARγ agonists TGZ, GW1929, and 15d-PGJ2. The
inhibitory effect was also observed when we used ZYFDC22
(10βH-8α,12-Epidioxyeremophil-7(11)-en-8β-ol) in combination with TGZ, GW1929, or
15d-PGJ2, followed by LPS stimulation, where 85% of CD86 surface
expression was significantly inhibited by the PPARγ agonists. The absence of
co-stimulatory molecules, such as CD86, influences DC function, altering their
maturation and varying the expression of the necessary signals required for the
activation and differentiation of naïve T-cells into type 1 (IL-12 and interferon
gamma (IFNγ)) or type 2 (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) cytokine-producing cells. In this
context, our studies showed that both sesquiterpenes ZYFCD21 and ZYFDC22 inhibited
the secretion of the soluble factors TNF and IL-12p70 after LPS stimulation. These
results are comparable to those obtained by Uchi et al.,[51] who demonstrated that the sesquiterpene lactoneparthenolide inhibited DC
maturation and cytokine secretion induced by LPS.The level of IL-12 secreted by DC induced by microbial pathogens, such as LPS, during
the immunological synapse is a key factor in the outcome of immune responses. IL-12
is a critical Th1-skewing cytokine that elicits IFNγ production by T-cells and by
natural killer (NK) cells,[52] favoring a Th2/Th3 response and inhibiting T cell recruitment.[53] PPARγ is an important modulator on B and T lymphocytes as well as
DC[14,54,55] and PPARγ
ligands include a class of antidiabetic drugs, thiazolidinediones (TZD); as well as
naturally produced PGD2 and its metabolite 15-dideoxy-Δ PGJ2
(15d-PGJ2), which associate irreversibly to the receptor through
covalent binding, mediating their effects by activation of PPARγ-dependent and
independent pathways.[17,56] Prostaglandins’ production results in activation of
PPARγ-mediated transcription, leading to the inhibition of differentiation,
migration, and cytokine secretion by antigen-presenting cells, such as DC or
macrophages, hence affecting the priming and effector functions of T lymphocytes.[17]Our studies showed for the first time that DC exposed to the PPARγ ligands TGZ,
GW1929, and 15d-PGJ2 in the presence of these novel isolated bicycliceremophilane-type petasite sesquiterpenesZYFDC21 and ZYFDC22 followed by LPS
stimulation exhibited a significant reduction (up to 95%) in the production of the
bioactive isoform of IL-12 (IL-12p70). In this regard, it has been documented that
15d-PGJ2 abrogates IL-12 production by directly inhibiting the
function of IκB kinase (IKK), therefore preventing the translocation of nuclear
factor-κB (NF-κB) to the nucleus.[30,57-59] Our results showed that
sesquiterpenes reduced LPS-induced DC maturation and inhibited TNF and IL-6 release,
as well as the production of the bioactive isoform of IL-12p70, presumably through
the direct activation of PPARγ. Since it is well known that the transcription factor
NF-κB plays a key role in the activation of PPARγ in the inflammatory response, it
would be of interest to determine whether sesquiterpenes bind directly to the PPARγ
receptors, thereby inhibiting IKK, and to analyze the downstream signaling cascades
that would prevent the translocation of NF-κB to the nucleus, interfering with the
inflammatory response. In summary, our results suggest that the novel Fukinone and
10βH-8α,12-Epidioxyeremophil-7(11)-en-8β-ol sesquiterpenes derived from P. tatewakianus inhibit the maturation of DC, as well as
the production of TNF, IL-6, and IL-12p70 after LPS stimulation. These events seem
to be mediated and potentiated by the activation of PPARγ. Petasite sesquiterpenes
are compounds with significant potential value for the treatment of inflammatory
disorders.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplementary_figure_1 for Bicycliceremophilane-type
petasite sesquiterpenes potentiate peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ
activator–mediated inhibition of dendritic cells by Narcy Arizmendi, Chenjie
Hou, Fujiang Guo, Yiming Li and Marianna Kulka in International Journal of
Immunopathology and PharmacologyClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplementary_figure_2 for Bicycliceremophilane-type
petasite sesquiterpenes potentiate peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ
activator–mediated inhibition of dendritic cells by Narcy Arizmendi, Chenjie
Hou, Fujiang Guo, Yiming Li and Marianna Kulka in International Journal of
Immunopathology and PharmacologyClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, Supplementary_figure_3 for Bicycliceremophilane-type
petasite sesquiterpenes potentiate peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ
activator–mediated inhibition of dendritic cells by Narcy Arizmendi, Chenjie
Hou, Fujiang Guo, Yiming Li and Marianna Kulka in International Journal of
Immunopathology and Pharmacology