Literature DB >> 30013608

Computer-assisted detection of tardus parvus waveforms on Doppler ultrasound.

Gowthaman Gunabushanam1, John D Millet1,2, Erik Stilp3, Forrest W Crawford4, Robert L McNamara3, Leslie M Scoutt1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a novel computer-generated metric, effective acceleration time, improves accuracy for detecting tardus parvus waveforms on spectral Doppler ultrasound.
METHODS: Patients with echocardiography-confirmed aortic valve stenosis (n = 132; 60 mild, 44 moderate, 28 severe) and matched controls (n = 48) who underwent carotid Doppler ultrasound were identified through an imaging database search at a single medical center. A custom-built spectral analysis computer program generated effective acceleration time values for spectral Doppler waveforms in the carotid arteries and a receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the optimal median effective acceleration time cutoff value to detect tardus parvus waveforms. Two radiologists, blinded to subject disease status, reviewed and rated all carotid sonograms for presence of tardus parvus waveforms. Inter-rater variability was measured, and the accuracy of aortic valve stenosis detection with and without use of the effective acceleration time cutoff was calculated.
RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an optimal effective acceleration time cutoff of ≥ 48 ms with a corresponding area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84). Use of the effAT cutoff demonstrated an accuracy of 74%. Accuracy of visual waveform interpretation by raters ranged from 43% to 61%. Inter-rater agreement in detection of tardus parvus waveforms was 76% (136/180 cases, K = 0.44, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Detection of tardus parvus waveforms through visual interpretation of spectral Doppler waveform morphology is limited by low accuracy and moderate inter-rater variability. Use of a computer-generated median effective acceleration time cutoff value markedly improves diagnostic accuracy and avoids observer variability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-aided diagnosis; aortic stenosis; spectral analysis; tardus parvus waveform

Year:  2017        PMID: 30013608      PMCID: PMC6042304          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X17747135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  31 in total

1.  Doppler waveform parvus and tardus. A sign of proximal flow obstruction.

Authors:  P S Kotval
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Detection of renal artery stenosis with Doppler sonography: it is more complicated than originally thought.

Authors:  R O Bude; J M Rubin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Hepatic artery: variability in measurement of resistive index and systolic acceleration time in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  E K Paulson; M A Kliewer; M G Frederick; M T Keogan; D M Delong; R C Nelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Renal Doppler resistance indices are associated with systemic atherosclerosis in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Gunnar H Heine; Markus K Gerhart; Christof Ulrich; Hans Köhler; Matthias Girndt
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  [Arterial duplex and aortic valve stenosis: sensitivity and specificity of findings].

Authors:  N Verbeeck; L Casters; F Lebrun
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  2006-06

6.  Evaluation of the tardus-parvus pattern in patients with atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Jian-chu Li; Yan Yuan; Wei Qin; Lei Wang; Qing Dai; Zhen-hong Qi; Hua Meng; Sheng Cai; Yu-xin Jiang
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Colour Doppler ultrasound in renal artery stenosis: intrarenal waveform analysis.

Authors:  G M Baxter; F Aitchison; D Sheppard; J G Moss; M J McLeod; P N Harden; J G Love; M Robertson; G Taylor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Recommendations on the Echocardiographic Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focused Update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Thor Edvardsen; Steven Goldstein; Patrizio Lancellotti; Melissa LeFevre; Fletcher Miller; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Duplex sonography of the carotid arteries in patients with isolated aortic stenosis: imaging findings and relation to severity of stenosis.

Authors:  M K O'Boyle; N I Vibhakar; J Chung; W D Keen; B B Gosink
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Accuracy of colour duplex sonography for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Aso Saeed; Göran Bergström; Karin Zachrisson; Gregor Guron; Elzbieta Nowakowska-Fortuna; Ellen Fredriksen; Lars Lönn; Gert Jensen; Hans Herlitz
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.844

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.