| Literature DB >> 30013530 |
Lan-Hua Li1, Yi Zhang2, Dan Zhu2, Xiao-Nong Zhou2.
Abstract
Maternally inherited endosymbionts inhabit a variety of arthropods. Some of them can protect the arthropod host against a wide range of pathogens. However, very little is known about the association between endosymbionts and pathogen susceptibility in ticks. The present study investigated the effect of endosymbionts on larva-to-nymph transstadial transmission of Babesia microti by Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides ticks. Engorged female ticks were injected with PBS, ciprofloxacin or kanamycin. The offspring larvae were used to infest B. microti-positive mice. Prevalence of B. microti among the nymphs in different treatment groups and its association with endosymbiont density in the larvae were analyzed. The results showed that the prevalence of B. microti in the kanamycin-treated group (63.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.8-75.0%) was higher than that in the PBS (23.6%, 95% CI: 13.8-33.4%) or ciprofloxacin-treated (25.0%, 95% CI: 15.0-35.0%) groups. This increased prevalence was associated with reduced density of Coxiella-like endosymbiont but was not related to the density of Rickettsia-like endosymbiont. No direct evidence has previously been reported about the impact of Coxiella-like endosymbiont on pathogen susceptibility in ticks. This study reveals that endosymbionts are potentially important defensive symbionts of R. haemaphysaloides which may influence the colonization or susceptibility of B. microti in the tick host.Entities:
Keywords: Babesia microti; Coxiella; Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides; Rickettsia; endosymbiont; transmission capacity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30013530 PMCID: PMC6036257 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Primers for PCR and qPCR amplification.
| Organism | Target gene | Primer | Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bab1A | GTCTTAGTATAAGCTTTTATACAGCG | |||
| Bab4A | GATAGGTCAGAAACTTGAATGATACATCG | |||
| Bab2A | CAGTTATAGTTTATTTGATGTTCGTTTTAC | |||
| Bab3A | CGGCAAAGCCATGCGATTCGCTAAT | |||
| Ractin-F | GTGCCCATCTACGAAGGTTAC | |||
| Ractin-R | CCATCTCCTGCTCGAAGTCC | |||
| Citrate synthase gene ( | gltA-F | TCCTACATGCCGACCATGAG | ||
| gltA-R | AAAGGGTTAGCTCCGGATGAG | |||
| L-CoxF | TGAGTGTTGACGTTACCCACAG | |||
| L-CoxR | GCATTTCACCGCTACACCG | |||
Prevalence of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides nymphs from different treatment groups.
| Treatment | No. of nymphs detected | No. positive | Prevalence, % (confidence interval)1 | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBS | 72 | 17 | 23.6 (13.8, 33.4)a | 32.2 | <0.001 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 72 | 18 | 25.0 (15.0, 35.0)a | ||
| Kanamycin | 72 | 46 | 63.9 (52.8, 75.0)b | ||
Parasitemia density of B. microti in mice at different time points after infestation with PBS- or antibiotic-treated R. haemaphysaloides ticks.
| Treatment | ID of mouse | Day 1 (%)1 | Day 4 (%)2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBS | 1 | 23.4 | 66.8 |
| PBS | 2 | 17.3 | 58.5 |
| PBS | 3 | 12.9 | 59.9 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 4 | 20.8 | 69.3 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 5 | 16.5 | 62.8 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 6 | 13.2 | 57.7 |
| Kanamycin | 7 | 20.6 | 70.2 |
| Kanamycin | 8 | 19.7 | 65.8 |
| Kanamycin | 9 | 12.1 | 55.1 |
Weights of engorged larvae gathered from different mice (micrograms).
| Treatment | ID of mouse | No. of engorged larvae | Weight of engorged larvae ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBS | 1 | 24 | 0.302 ± 0.023 |
| PBS | 2 | 24 | 0.313 ± 0.021 |
| PBS | 3 | 24 | 0.305 ± 0.026 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 4 | 24 | 0.312 ± 0.025 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 5 | 24 | 0.306 ± 0.030 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 6 | 24 | 0.305 ± 0.022 |
| Kanamycin | 7 | 24 | 0.297 ± 0.024 |
| Kanamycin | 8 | 24 | 0.308 ± 0.019 |
| Kanamycin | 9 | 24 | 0.304 ± 0.022 |
| 0.8 | |||
| 0.44 | |||
Bivariate correlation of parasitemia density of mice, body weight of engorged larvae, relative density of Coxiella- or Rickettsia-LE, and prevalence of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides nymphs.
| Log-transformed relative density of | Prevalence of | |
|---|---|---|
| Log-transformed relative density of | 0.721 | -0.50 |
| Log-transformed relative density of | -0.872 | |
Potential factors associated with infection of R. haemaphysaloides nymphs as revealed by a two-level logistic regression model.
| Variable | Coefficient | Standard error | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | -4.56 | 13.81 | -0.33 | 0.74 | -31.8, 22.7 |
| Weight of engorged larvae | 1.58 | 47.64 | 0.03 | 0.97 | -92.4, 95.6 |
| Parasitemia of mice on day 4 of infestation | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.99 | -0.1, 0.1 |
| Log-transformed relative density of | 0.26 | 0.24 | 1.05 | 0.30 | -0.2, 0.7 |
| Log-transformed relative density of | -1.29 | 0.41 | -3.15 | 0.002 | -2.1, -0.5 |