Literature DB >> 30013530

Endosymbionts Alter Larva-to-Nymph Transstadial Transmission of Babesia microti in Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides Ticks.

Lan-Hua Li1, Yi Zhang2, Dan Zhu2, Xiao-Nong Zhou2.   

Abstract

Maternally inherited endosymbionts inhabit a variety of arthropods. Some of them can protect the arthropod host against a wide range of pathogens. However, very little is known about the association between endosymbionts and pathogen susceptibility in ticks. The present study investigated the effect of endosymbionts on larva-to-nymph transstadial transmission of Babesia microti by Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides ticks. Engorged female ticks were injected with PBS, ciprofloxacin or kanamycin. The offspring larvae were used to infest B. microti-positive mice. Prevalence of B. microti among the nymphs in different treatment groups and its association with endosymbiont density in the larvae were analyzed. The results showed that the prevalence of B. microti in the kanamycin-treated group (63.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.8-75.0%) was higher than that in the PBS (23.6%, 95% CI: 13.8-33.4%) or ciprofloxacin-treated (25.0%, 95% CI: 15.0-35.0%) groups. This increased prevalence was associated with reduced density of Coxiella-like endosymbiont but was not related to the density of Rickettsia-like endosymbiont. No direct evidence has previously been reported about the impact of Coxiella-like endosymbiont on pathogen susceptibility in ticks. This study reveals that endosymbionts are potentially important defensive symbionts of R. haemaphysaloides which may influence the colonization or susceptibility of B. microti in the tick host.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Babesia microti; Coxiella; Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides; Rickettsia; endosymbiont; transmission capacity

Year:  2018        PMID: 30013530      PMCID: PMC6036257          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Ticks are among the most important vectors of human and animal pathogens in the world. They can transmit various pathogens including viruses, bacteria, and parasites (Man et al., 2016; Ait et al., 2017; Zhuang et al., 2018). In addition to pathogens, a diverse group of symbiotic microorganisms are also present in ticks. To date, bacteria of the Rickettsia, Coxiella, Francisella, Arsenophonus, Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii, and Wolbachia genera have been found to be symbiotic in ticks (Liu et al., 2013). Symbionts may play important roles in the host’s reproduction, development, nutritional adaptation, defense against environmental stress, and immunity (Dale and Moran, 2006). For example, Coxiella-like endosymbiont was revealed to be associated with reproductive fitness of Amblyomma americanum and Haemaphysalis longicornis (Zhong et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2017), while Ca. Midichloria mitochondrii was found to play a role in the engorgement and molt of Ixodes ricinus ticks (Ninio et al., 2015). Bacterial symbionts can also influence pathogen acquisition, colonization or susceptibility in ticks (Narasimhan et al., 2014; Gall et al., 2016; Abraham et al., 2017). For example, antibiotic treatment could change the susceptibility of I. scapularis ticks to Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A. marginale, Borrelia burgdorferi, and Francisella novicida by disrupting the symbionts (Gall et al., 2016). However, the biology of symbionts and their effect on ticks is still largely unexplored (Ahantarig et al., 2013; Bonnet et al., 2017). Human babesiosis is an important tick-borne zoonotic disease and is considered an emerging threat in China (Vannier and Krause, 2015). Babesia microti is one of the major pathogens of human babesiosis. Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides, a widely distributed tick species in China (Chen et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2015), has been proven to be a vector of B. microti (Li et al., 2016). Our previous study revealed that Rickettsia and Coxiella-like endosymbionts (Rickettsia-LE and Coxiella-LE hereafter) inhabit R. haemaphysaloides ticks (Li et al., 2018). However, the potential effects of endosymbionts on pathogen susceptibility in this tick species have not been investigated before. Therefore, we explored the effects of endosymbionts on larva-to-nymph transstadial transmission of B. microti by antibiotic-treated R. haemaphysaloides ticks.

Materials and Methods

Babesia microti, Ticks and Experimental Animals

Babesia microti used in the present study was the Peabody mjr Strain (ATCC PRA-99), provided by Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. An engorged female R. haemaphysaloides tick was initially removed from a dog in Tengchong County, Yunnan Province of China, and was then maintained in our laboratory at 25°C, with 85% relative humidity and a 14/10 h light/dark photoperiod regimen, as described previously (Li et al., 2016). This started the colony of R. haemaphysaloides in our laboratory. Specific-pathogen-free female BALB/c mice weighing 16–18 g were used to feed larvae and nymphs for maintenance of the colony. New Zealand white rabbits were used to feed adult ticks. The engorged female R. haemaphysaloides ticks used for antibiotic treatment in present study were the fourth generation of the colony. All animal experiments were performed according to the protocols approved by the Ethics Committee at the National Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, based in Shanghai (Approval No. IPD-2016-12).

Antibiotic Treatments of Engorged Female Ticks

Nine engorged female ticks were randomly assigned to three treatment groups and injected with ciprofloxacin (10 mg/ml), kanamycin (10 mg/ml) or PBS separately, as described previously (Li et al., 2018). In brief, engorged female ticks were injected at the hemocoel between the first and second legs using a Hamilton microinjection syringe (Hamilton Co., Bonaduz, Switzerland). The needle was left inside the tick body for at least 30 s and then withdrawn slowly. The doses used for injection were 1 μl of solution per 100 mg body weight of engorged ticks. This dosage was proven to be effective to reduce the density of Rickettsia-LE or Coxiella-LE by our previous study (Li et al., 2018). The injected ticks were then maintained in separate containers for oviposition and incubation.

Quantitative Detection of Rickettsia-LE and Coxiella-LE in Unfed Larvae

From each of the nine engorged female ticks, DNA was extracted from a subset of 30 unfed larvae using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In each round of DNA extraction, one blank sample was included to assess contamination. DNA concentration was quantified by Thermo Nanodrop spectrophotometers (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Wilmington, DE, United States), and all DNA samples were adjusted to equal molar concentrations before qPCR detection. Relative densities of Rickettsia-LE and Coxiella-LE in larvae were then analyzed by the SYBR Green qPCR method, as described previously (Li et al., 2018). The beta-actin biosynthetic (actin) gene fragment of R. haemaphysaloides ticks, citrate synthase (gltA) gene fragment of Rickettsia-LE and 16S rRNA gene fragment of Coxiella-LE were qPCR-amplified separately (Table ). Relative density of Rickettsia-LE or Coxiella-LE was defined as Rickettsia gltA or Coxiella 16S rRNA gene copies per tick actin gene copy (Li et al., 2018). Primers for PCR and qPCR amplification. The volume of each qPCR mixture was 15 μl, containing 7.5 μl qPCR Master Mix Plus (Takara Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan), 0.5 μl of each 5 mM primer, 1.5 μl DNA sample, and 5 μl of water. Four negative controls were used in each 96-well qPCR plate. All qPCR was performed under conditions of 95°C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s, with the fluorescence recorded at the annealing stage, using a CFX96 Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, United States).

Acquisition of B. microti by R. haemaphysaloides Larvae

The cryopreserved B. microti stabilates were balanced to room temperature. Donor BALB/c mice were injected intraperitoneally with 100 μl of the stabilates. At the peak time of infection, namely, on the 8th day after incubation, blood was collected from the infected donor mice. A thin blood smear was made with 1 μl of tail blood. The smears were examined under microscope after being fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa solution. A total of 500 red blood cells were counted for each smear. Parasitemia density was defined as the number of B. microti protozoa per 100 red blood cells, namely, the percentage of infected red blood cells. The B. microti-positive blood was diluted with PBS to a parasitemia density of 15%. Nine BALB/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 100 μl of diluted blood. Four days after incubation, the parasitemia density of each mouse was examined. The mice were divided into three groups using stratified randomization according to parasitemia density. From each maternal tick, 200 larval ticks were used to infest a B. microti infected mouse. The mice were monitored every day, and the engorged larvae were collected after falling from the mice. On the 4th day of infestation, the parasitemia density of each mouse was examined again. Engorged larvae from each treatment and maternal tick were placed in two different containers. Those gathered on the 4th day of infestation were weighed individually by a Sartorius CPA225D balance (Ratingen, France) and put together into one container, while those gathered on other days were put together into another container. Four weeks after the first molted tick was observed (Li et al., 2016), 24 nymphs were randomly selected for B. microti detection from the container with larvae engorged on the 4th day of infestation.

Detection of B. microti Infection in Nymphs

DNA was extracted from each nymph, quantified and adjusted to equal concentrations as described above. Negative controls were used during DNA extraction. Nested PCR was then used to test for infection with a set of specific primers targeting the 18S rRNA gene of B. microti (Table ), under conditions of 3 min at 95°C, 35 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 57 and 72°C for 30 s, and ending at 72°C for 5 min. The 20 μl PCR mixture contained 10 μl of 2× Taq PCR Master Mix with dyes (DBI Bioscience, Shanghai, China), 2 μl of each primer at 5 mM, 3 μl of DNA sample, and 5 μl of water. One positive and four negative controls were used in each 96-well PCR plate. DNA extracted from the blood of a B. microti-positive mouse was used as positive control, while DNA extracted from blank samples was used as negative control. The PCR was performed in a C1000 TouchTM Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, United States). Samples with 154-bp PCR products were recognized as B. microti-positive. One positive PCR product was selected from each PCR plate for sequencing to confirm B. microti infection.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS 19.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, United States). The relative densities of Rickettsia-LE and Coxiella-LE were log-transformed. One-way ANOVA was used to compare body weight of engorged larvae, parasitemia density of mice and log-transformed relative density of endosymbionts among groups, and the Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) method was further used for pairwise comparison. The chi-square test was used to compare the nymphal prevalence of B. microti among different groups. Bonferroni method was used for pairwise comparison of prevalence. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to analyze the bivariate correlations among the parasitemia density of mice, weight of engorged larvae, density of endosymbionts, and prevalence of B. microti in nymphs. A multilevel fixed-effect logistic model was further used to analyze the separate effects of parasitemia density of mice, weight of engorged larvae, and density of endosymbionts on nymphal prevalence of B. microti. Significant differences were defined as p < 0.05 with a two-tailed test. The overall experimental procedure is shown in Figure . Larva-to-nymph transmission experiments of B. microti through endosymbiont-disrupted R. haemaphysaloides larvae.

Results

Effects of Antibiotic Treatment on the Density of Coxiella-LE and Rickettsia-LE in R. haemaphysaloides Larvae

Nine engorged female ticks were randomly divided into three equal groups and injected with PBS, ciprofloxacin or kanamycin. The relative density of Rickettsia-LE and Coxiella-LE in the offspring larvae were analyzed by qPCR (Figure ). Pairwise comparison using the SNK method showed that the relative density of Rickettsia-LE in the larvae of both ciprofloxacin- and kanamycin-treated groups were statistically lower than that in the larvae of the PBS-treated group (Figure ). The relative density of Coxiella-LE was statistically lower in the kanamycin-treated group than in the ciprofloxacin- and PBS-treated groups; however, ciprofloxacin injection had little influence on the relative density of Coxiella-LE when compared to the PBS treatment (Figure ). Log-transformed relative density of Coxiella-LE (A) and Rickettsia-LE (B) in R. haemaphysaloides larvae from the antibiotic- or PBS-treated groups (Groups with the same letters showed no statistical significance in pairwise comparisons).

Effects of Antibiotic Treatment on Larva-to-Nymph Transmission of B. microti by R. haemaphysaloides

The larvae of each maternal tick were used to infest B. microti-positive mice. For each maternal tick, 24 offspring nymphs were selected for B. microti detection from engorged larvae gathered on the 4th day of infestation. As shown in Table , the prevalence of B. microti in kanamycin-treated group (63.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 52.8–75.0%) was significantly higher than that in the PBS (23.6%, 95% CI: 13.8–33.4%), and ciprofloxacin-treated groups (25.0%, 95% CI: 15.0–35.0%). Meanwhile, prevalence among groups within the same treatment was not statistically different (Supplementary Table S1). B. microti infection was further confirmed by sequencing of PCR products. Prevalence of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides nymphs from different treatment groups.

Impacts of the Parasitemia Density of Mice, Weight of Engorged Larvae, and Density of Endosymbionts on the Prevalence of B. microti in Nymphs

Both the body weight of engorged larvae and parasitemia densities of mice on the 1st and 4th day of infestation were similar among the different groups (P = 0.44, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively; Tables , ). As shown in Table , prevalence of B. microti in nymphs was negatively associated with relative density of Coxiella-LE in larvae (correlation coefficient = -0.87, P = 0.002) but not associated with relative density of Rickettsia-LE (correlation coefficient = -0.50, P = 0.175). According to the multilevel logistic regression model (Table ), the altered density of Coxiella-LE affected the prevalence of B. microti (P = 0.002). This effect was present regardless of parasitemia density of mice, body weight of engorged larvae or relative density of Rickettsia-LE. Parasitemia density of B. microti in mice at different time points after infestation with PBS- or antibiotic-treated R. haemaphysaloides ticks. Weights of engorged larvae gathered from different mice (micrograms). Bivariate correlation of parasitemia density of mice, body weight of engorged larvae, relative density of Coxiella- or Rickettsia-LE, and prevalence of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides nymphs. Potential factors associated with infection of R. haemaphysaloides nymphs as revealed by a two-level logistic regression model.

Discussion

Maternally inherited symbionts can protect their arthropod hosts against a wide range of pathogens (Bonnet et al., 2017). For example, Wolbachia may disrupt the transmission of a variety of pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, protozoa, and nematodes, by the insect host. Recently, Wolbachia has been used to control mosquito-transmitted diseases (Hoffmann et al., 2011). In comparison, very little is known about the association between symbionts and pathogen susceptibility in ticks. Our previous study has revealed that both Coxiella-LE and Rickettsia-LE inhabit 100% of R. haemaphysaloides ticks (Li et al., 2018). Meanwhile, Coxiella-LE was found to be associated with reproduction in R. haemaphysaloides ticks, but Rickettsia-LE was not (Li et al., 2018). However, the effect of Rickettsia or Coxiella endosymbionts on pathogen susceptibility in R. haemaphysaloides ticks has not been well established. In the present study, we investigated the impact of Rickettsia-LE and Coxiella-LE on larva-to-nymph transstadial transmission of B. microti by R. haemaphysaloides ticks. The results showed that the density of Coxiella-LE was related to the susceptibility of ticks on B. microti, but Rickettsia-LE was not. Coxiella-LE is found only in ticks and inhabits at least two-thirds of tick species (Duron et al., 2017). Despite its wide distribution in ticks, the effects of Coxiella-LE on pathogen transmission by ticks are still unknown. Klyachko et al. (2007) localized Coxiella endosymbiont within A. americanum. Coxiella-LE was observed in several tick tissues, including the midgut, and salivary gland. They speculated that Coxiella-LE might be involved in the transmission of other pathogens. However, no direct evidence has been reported about the impact of Coxiella-LE on pathogen transmission in ticks. Our previous study found that Coxiella-LE was the most abundant symbiont in R. haemaphysaloides ticks (Li et al., 2018). The present study further revealed that the reduced density of Coxiella-LE in larval ticks of R. haemaphysaloides is associated with larva-to-nymph transstadial transmission of B. microti. It has been argued that maternal antibiotic treatment might change the amount of blood ingested by the offspring larvae (Dai et al., 2010). Thus, we compared the parasitemia density of mice and body weight of engorged larvae among different groups, and we analyzed their influence on transstadial transmission of B. microti from larva to nymph. The results showed that the association between Coxiella-LE and the prevalence of B. microti existed regardless of the body weight of engorged larvae and parasitemia density of mice (Tables –). The results suggest that Coxiella-LE may play an important role in limiting the infection of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides ticks. Rickettsia-LE is also very common in ticks and inhabits more than half of tick species (Duron et al., 2017). It is the second most abundant symbiont in R. haemaphysaloides ticks and occurs in 100% of ticks from this species (Li et al., 2018). Previous studies have suggested that Rickettsia-LE may influence pathogen susceptibility in ticks. Steiner et al. (2008) investigated coinfection of A. phagocytophilum, B. microti, B. odocoilei, B. burgdorferi, and Rickettsia-LE in field-collected questing I. scapularis ticks. They found that Rickettsia-LE and B. burgdorferi co-occurred less frequently than expected in male ticks. Macaluso et al. (2002) studied the ability of Dermacentor variabilis ticks to maintain multiple species of rickettsiae through transovarial transmission. They revealed that rickettsial infection inhibited transovarial transmission of another Rickettsia (Macaluso et al., 2002). Meanwhile, Gall et al. (2016) treated female D. andersoni ticks with an antibiotic and explored the pathogen–endosymbiont relationship in the offspring ticks. The results showed that an increase in the quantity of Rickettsia-LE was associated with reduced A. marginale levels in blood-fed ticks. The above studies suggested that Rickettsia-LE may be an important defensive symbiont protecting ticks against pathogens (Bonnet et al., 2017). However, the present study found that a reduced density of Rickettsia-LE was not associated with the susceptibility of R. haemaphysaloides ticks to B. microti. The results suggest that Rickettsia-LE and different pathogens may have varying interactions (Gall et al., 2016). There are several limitations of the present study. First, in addition to endosymbionts, ticks can harbor various extracellular bacteria, especially in the guts (Abraham et al., 2017). It is possible that antibiotic treatment of the adult ticks could simultaneously change the abundance of other bacteria in the guts of the offspring larvae. Hence, the altered transmission capability might be derived from the impact of bacteria other than Coxiella-LE and Rickettsia-LE. However, since Coxiella-LE and Rickettsia-LE are transovarially transmitted, while extracellular bacteria are often obtained from the environment (Kwan et al., 2017), the impact of gut bacteria was not investigated in our study. More investigations are still needed to assess the effect of maternal antibiotic treatment on the composition of other bacteria, especially the gut microbiome, in offspring larvae. Second, only 24 offspring nymphs were tested for B. microti infection per female tick, and thus, the result of the present study provides a preliminary understanding of the role of endosymbionts on B. microti transstadial transmission in R. haemaphysaloides. Considering the similar prevalence among groups that received the same treatment and the significant differences in prevalence among different treatments (Table and Supplementary Table S1), we believe that the results of the present study are robust. Third, Coxiella-LE and Rickettsia-LE were not evaluated in each organ of the nymphs. Nevertheless, it is justified to consider that the density of these endosymbionts was altered in all relevant organs of the offspring ticks, because antibiotic treatment of maternal ticks reduces the number of endosymbionts in eggs (Li et al., 2018). Finally, B. microti infection was not tested in larvae engorged from positive mice or during the molting process. Instead, we assumed that the number of protozoa ingested by the larvae depended on the amount of blood being ingested by ticks and the parasitemia density of the blood, and our study revealed that the average body weight of engorged larvae and the parasitemia density of blood were similar among different treatment groups.

Conclusion

Our study revealed that maternal kanamycin treatment could reduce the density of Coxiella-LE in the offspring larvae, thus leading to increased larva-to-nymph transstadial transmission of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides ticks. However, a reduced density of Rickettsia-LE due to ciprofloxacin treatment was not associated with susceptibility of R. haemaphysaloides ticks to B. microti. The results indicate that Coxiella-LE is likely an important defensive endosymbiont, and it potentially can influence pathogen colonization or susceptibility in ticks. More investigations are needed to assess the influence of endosymbionts on nymph-to-adult transmission of B. microti in ticks, to observe the dynamics of B. microti protozoa during the molting process of engorged ticks and to further investigate the underlying defensive mechanisms of these endosymbionts.

Author Contributions

L-HL designed and performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. YZ, DZ, and X-NZ conceived the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Written consent to publish was obtained.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Table 1

Primers for PCR and qPCR amplification.

OrganismTarget genePrimerSequence (5′ to 3′)Reference
B. microti18S rRNA geneBab1AGTCTTAGTATAAGCTTTTATACAGCGLi et al., 2016
Bab4AGATAGGTCAGAAACTTGAATGATACATCG
Bab2ACAGTTATAGTTTATTTGATGTTCGTTTTAC
Bab3ACGGCAAAGCCATGCGATTCGCTAAT
R. haemaphysaloidesActin geneRactin-FGTGCCCATCTACGAAGGTTACLi et al., 2018
Ractin-RCCATCTCCTGCTCGAAGTCC
Rickettsia-LECitrate synthase gene (gltA)gltA-FTCCTACATGCCGACCATGAGLi et al., 2018
gltA-RAAAGGGTTAGCTCCGGATGAG
Coxiella-LE16S rRNA geneL-CoxFTGAGTGTTGACGTTACCCACAGLi et al., 2018
L-CoxRGCATTTCACCGCTACACCG
Table 2

Prevalence of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides nymphs from different treatment groups.

TreatmentNo. of nymphs detectedNo. positivePrevalence, % (confidence interval)1χ2P
PBS721723.6 (13.8, 33.4)a32.2<0.001
Ciprofloxacin721825.0 (15.0, 35.0)a
Kanamycin724663.9 (52.8, 75.0)b
Table 3

Parasitemia density of B. microti in mice at different time points after infestation with PBS- or antibiotic-treated R. haemaphysaloides ticks.

TreatmentID of mouseDay 1 (%)1Day 4 (%)2
PBS123.466.8
PBS217.358.5
PBS312.959.9
Ciprofloxacin420.869.3
Ciprofloxacin516.562.8
Ciprofloxacin613.257.7
Kanamycin720.670.2
Kanamycin819.765.8
Kanamycin912.155.1
Table 4

Weights of engorged larvae gathered from different mice (micrograms).

TreatmentID of mouseNo. of engorged larvaeWeight of engorged larvae ( ± S)
PBS1240.302 ± 0.023
PBS2240.313 ± 0.021
PBS3240.305 ± 0.026
Ciprofloxacin4240.312 ± 0.025
Ciprofloxacin5240.306 ± 0.030
Ciprofloxacin6240.305 ± 0.022
Kanamycin7240.297 ± 0.024
Kanamycin8240.308 ± 0.019
Kanamycin9240.304 ± 0.022
F among treatments0.8
P among treatments0.44
Table 5

Bivariate correlation of parasitemia density of mice, body weight of engorged larvae, relative density of Coxiella- or Rickettsia-LE, and prevalence of B. microti in R. haemaphysaloides nymphs.

Log-transformed relative density of Coxiella-LEPrevalence of B. microti in nymphs
Log-transformed relative density of Rickettsia-LE0.721-0.50
Log-transformed relative density of Coxiella-LE-0.872
Table 6

Potential factors associated with infection of R. haemaphysaloides nymphs as revealed by a two-level logistic regression model.

VariableCoefficientStandard errortP95% CI
Intercept-4.5613.81-0.330.74-31.8, 22.7
Weight of engorged larvae1.5847.640.030.97-92.4, 95.6
Parasitemia of mice on day 4 of infestation0.000.040.010.99-0.1, 0.1
Log-transformed relative density of Rickettsia-LE0.260.241.050.30-0.2, 0.7
Log-transformed relative density of Coxiella-LE-1.290.41-3.150.002-2.1, -0.5
  25 in total

1.  Babesiosis in China, an emerging threat.

Authors:  Edouard Vannier; Peter J Krause
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 2.  Molecular interactions between bacterial symbionts and their hosts.

Authors:  Colin Dale; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Evolutionary changes in symbiont community structure in ticks.

Authors:  Olivier Duron; Florian Binetruy; Valérie Noël; Julie Cremaschi; Karen D McCoy; Céline Arnathau; Olivier Plantard; John Goolsby; Adalberto A Pérez de León; Dieter J A Heylen; A Raoul Van Oosten; Yuval Gottlieb; Gad Baneth; Alberto A Guglielmone; Agustin Estrada-Peña; Maxwell N Opara; Lionel Zenner; Fabrice Vavre; Christine Chevillon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Hard ticks and their bacterial endosymbionts (or would be pathogens).

Authors:  Arunee Ahantarig; Wachareeporn Trinachartvanit; Visut Baimai; Libor Grubhoffer
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission.

Authors:  A A Hoffmann; B L Montgomery; J Popovici; I Iturbe-Ormaetxe; P H Johnson; F Muzzi; M Greenfield; M Durkan; Y S Leong; Y Dong; H Cook; J Axford; A G Callahan; N Kenny; C Omodei; E A McGraw; P A Ryan; S A Ritchie; M Turelli; S L O'Neill
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Tick histamine release factor is critical for Ixodes scapularis engorgement and transmission of the lyme disease agent.

Authors:  Jianfeng Dai; Sukanya Narasimhan; Lili Zhang; Lei Liu; Penghua Wang; Erol Fikrig
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  Infection and co-infection rates of Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants, Babesia spp., Borrelia burgdorferi, and the rickettsial endosymbiont in Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) from sites in Indiana, Maine, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

Authors:  Fresia E Steiner; Robert R Pinger; Carolyn N Vann; Nate Grindle; David Civitello; Keith Clay; Clay Fuqua
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  The bacterial microbiome of Dermacentor andersoni ticks influences pathogen susceptibility.

Authors:  Cory A Gall; Kathryn E Reif; Glen A Scoles; Kathleen L Mason; Michelle Mousel; Susan M Noh; Kelly A Brayton
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Antibiotic treatment of the tick vector Amblyomma americanum reduced reproductive fitness.

Authors:  Jianmin Zhong; Algimantas Jasinskas; Alan G Barbour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microbial communities and symbionts in the hard tick Haemaphysalis longicornis (Acari: Ixodidae) from north China.

Authors:  Li-Meng Liu; Jian-Nan Liu; Zhao Liu; Zhi-Jun Yu; Shi-Qi Xu; Xiao-Hong Yang; Tuo Li; Si-Si Li; Li-Da Guo; Jing-Ze Liu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.876

View more
  4 in total

1.  First insights into the microbiome of Tunisian Hyalomma ticks gained through next-generation sequencing with a special focus on H. scupense.

Authors:  Hayet Benyedem; Abdelmalek Lekired; Moez Mhadhbi; Mokhtar Dhibi; Rihab Romdhane; Soufiene Chaari; Mourad Rekik; Hadda-Imene Ouzari; Tarek Hajji; Mohamed Aziz Darghouth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 2.  Current debates and advances in tick microbiome research.

Authors:  Alejandra Wu-Chuang; Adnan Hodžić; Lourdes Mateos-Hernández; Agustín Estrada-Peña; Dasiel Obregon; Alejandro Cabezas-Cruz
Journal:  Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis       Date:  2021-06-06

3.  Phylogenetic Studies of Coxiella-Like Bacteria and Spotted Fever Group Rickettsiae in Ticks Collected From Vegetation in Chaiyaphum Province, Thailand.

Authors:  Pawiga Usananan; Warissara Kaenkan; Ronnayuth Sudsangiem; Visut Baimai; Wachareeporn Trinachartvanit; Arunee Ahantarig
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Borrelia afzelii Infection in the Rodent Host Has Dramatic Effects on the Bacterial Microbiome of Ixodes ricinus Ticks.

Authors:  Phineas T Hamilton; Elodie Maluenda; Anouk Sarr; Alessandro Belli; Georgia Hurry; Olivier Duron; Olivier Plantard; Maarten J Voordouw
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.792

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.