Literature DB >> 30013241

Effects of a Multicourse, Composite Examination Method on the Performance of PharmD Students in a Basic Pharmacokinetics Course.

Reza Mehvar1, Richard Beuttler2.   

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the effects of multicourse, composite examinations on student performance in a pharmacokinetics course. Methods. A linear, mixed-effects model was used to analyze student performance in identical daily quiz and examination questions in a pharmacokinetics course at two pharmacy schools. The same instructor taught the entire course at both institutions. The only difference between the two courses was the method of administration of examinations between the two school cohorts. Results. Students' scores on identical daily quizzes that were administered similarly to students in both schools were the same. However, student grades on multicourse examinations were significantly lower than those administered as individual course examinations in the other school group. The effect size was 1.15, indicating a large difference between the two cohorts in terms of their examination scores. The mixed-effects model revealed a negligible difference (0.622%) between the two student cohorts in terms of their academic abilities but showed a substantial effect (9.40%) for the examination format in favor of single course assessment. Conclusion. When compared to traditional, individual course examination, multicourse, composite examinations may significantly lower student grades in a pharmacokinetics course.

Keywords:  basic pharmacokinetics; composite examination; integrated examination; multicourse examination; student performance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30013241      PMCID: PMC6041494          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  9 in total

1.  Implementation and Use of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment at US Schools of Pharmacy.

Authors:  Justine Schuller Gortney; Brenda S Bray; Francine D Salinitri
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Using Effect Size-or Why the P Value Is Not Enough.

Authors:  Gail M Sullivan; Richard Feinn
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-09

3.  Incremental development of an integrated assessment method for the professional curriculum.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Mark L Britton; Nancy A Letassy; Vince Dennis; JoLaine R Draugalis
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Progress examinations in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

6.  Optimizing Learning in College: Tips From Cognitive Psychology.

Authors:  Adam L Putnam; Victor W Sungkhasettee; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-09

7.  Student Pharmacists' Perceptions of a Composite Examination in Their First Professional Year.

Authors:  Sharon L K McDonough; Elizabeth L Alford; Shannon W Finks; Robert B Parker; Marie A Chisholm-Burns; Stephanie J Phelps
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  The Validation of a Case-Based, Cumulative Assessment and Progressions Examination.

Authors:  Rebecca L Brady; Adeola O Coker; Jeffrey T Copeland; Helmut B Gottlieb; Cheryl Horlen; Helen E Smith; Elizabeth M Urteaga; Sushma Ramsinghani; Alejandra Zertuche; David Maize
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Sleep Restriction Impairs Vocabulary Learning when Adolescents Cram for Exams: The Need for Sleep Study.

Authors:  Sha Huang; Aadya Deshpande; Sing-Chen Yeo; June C Lo; Michael W L Chee; Joshua J Gooley
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.