| Literature DB >> 30013198 |
Lynn Quek1,2,3, Muriel D David4, Alison Kennedy5,6, Marlen Metzner5,6, Michael Amatangelo7, Alan Shih8, Bilyana Stoilova5,6, Cyril Quivoron4, Maël Heiblig4, Christophe Willekens4,9, Véronique Saada4,9, Samar Alsafadi10, M S Vijayabaskar11, Andy Peniket12, Oliver A Bernard4, Sam Agresta13, Katharine Yen13, Kyle MacBeth7, Eytan Stein8, George S Vassiliou11,14,15,16, Ross Levine8,17,18, Stephane De Botton19,20, Anjan Thakurta21, Virginie Penard-Lacronique22, Paresh Vyas23,24,25.
Abstract
Mutations in the gene encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase 2 (IDH2) occur in several types of cancer, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In model systems, mutant IDH2 causes hematopoietic differentiation arrest. Enasidenib, a selective small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH2, produces a clinical response in 40% of treated patients with relapsed/refractory AML by promoting leukemic cell differentiation. Here, we studied the clonal basis of response and acquired resistance to enasidenib treatment. Using sequential patient samples, we determined the clonal structure of hematopoietic cell populations at different stages of differentiation. Before therapy, IDH2-mutant clones showed variable differentiation arrest. Enasidenib treatment promoted hematopoietic differentiation from either terminal or ancestral mutant clones; less frequently, treatment promoted differentiation of nonmutant cells. Analysis of paired diagnosis/relapse samples did not identify second-site mutations in IDH2 at relapse. Instead, relapse arose by clonal evolution or selection of terminal or ancestral clones, thus highlighting multiple bypass pathways that could potentially be targeted to restore differentiation arrest. These results show how mapping of clonal structure in cell populations at different stages of differentiation can reveal the response and evolution of clones during treatment response and relapse.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30013198 PMCID: PMC6925974 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0115-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440