Literature DB >> 30013119

Complex silica composite nanomaterials templated with DNA origami.

Xiaoguo Liu1,2, Fei Zhang3,4, Xinxin Jing1, Muchen Pan1, Pi Liu5,6, Wei Li7, Bowen Zhu1, Jiang Li1,8, Hong Chen9, Lihua Wang1, Jianping Lin5,6, Yan Liu3,4, Dongyuan Zhao7, Hao Yan10,11, Chunhai Fan12.   

Abstract

Genetically encoded protein scaffolds often serve as templates for the mineralization of biocomposite materials with complex yet highly controlled structural features that span from nanometres to the macroscopic scale1-4. Methods developed to mimic these fabrication capabilities can produce synthetic materials with well defined micro- and macro-sized features, but extending control to the nanoscale remains challenging5,6. DNA nanotechnology can deliver a wide range of customized nanoscale two- and three-dimensional assemblies with controlled sizes and shapes7-11. But although DNA has been used to modulate the morphology of inorganic materials12,13 and DNA nanostructures have served as moulds14,15 and templates16,17, it remains challenging to exploit the potential of DNA nanostructures fully because they require high-ionic-strength solutions to maintain their structure, and this in turn gives rise to surface charging that suppresses the material deposition. Here we report that the Stöber method, widely used for producing silica (silicon dioxide) nanostructures, can be adjusted to overcome this difficulty: when synthesis conditions are such that mineral precursor molecules do not deposit directly but first form clusters, DNA-silica hybrid materials that faithfully replicate the complex geometric information of a wide range of different DNA origami scaffolds are readily obtained. We illustrate this approach using frame-like, curved and porous DNA nanostructures, with one-, two- and three-dimensional complex hierarchical architectures that range in size from 10 to 1,000 nanometres. We also show that after coating with an amorphous silica layer, the thickness of which can be tuned by adjusting the growth time, hybrid structures can be up to ten times tougher than the DNA template while maintaining flexibility. These findings establish our approach as a general method for creating biomimetic silica nanostructures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30013119     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0332-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  34 in total

1.  Two-Dimensional Superstructures of Silica Cages.

Authors:  Tangi Aubert; Kai Ma; Kwan W Tan; Ulrich Wiesner
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Can an InChI for Nano Address the Need for a Simplified Representation of Complex Nanomaterials across Experimental and Nanoinformatics Studies?

Authors:  Iseult Lynch; Antreas Afantitis; Thomas Exner; Martin Himly; Vladimir Lobaskin; Philip Doganis; Dieter Maier; Natasha Sanabria; Anastasios G Papadiamantis; Anna Rybinska-Fryca; Maciej Gromelski; Tomasz Puzyn; Egon Willighagen; Blair D Johnston; Mary Gulumian; Marianne Matzke; Amaia Green Etxabe; Nathan Bossa; Angela Serra; Irene Liampa; Stacey Harper; Kaido Tämm; Alexander CØ Jensen; Pekka Kohonen; Luke Slater; Andreas Tsoumanis; Dario Greco; David A Winkler; Haralambos Sarimveis; Georgia Melagraki
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.076

3.  Harnessing Solar Energy using Phototrophic Microorganisms: A Sustainable Pathway to Bioenergy, Biomaterials, and Environmental Solutions.

Authors:  Rahamat Ullah Tanvir; Jianying Zhang; Timothy Canter; Dick Chen; Jingrang Lu; Zhiqiang Hu
Journal:  Renew Sustain Energy Rev       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 16.799

4.  Drug-loaded oleic-acid grafted mesoporous silica nanoparticles conjugated with α-lactalbumin resembling BAMLET-like anticancer agent with improved biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Wei Pei; Ling Cai; Xing Gong; Li Zhang; Jiarong Zhang; Ping Zhu; Huijun Jiang; Chao Wang; Shoulin Wang; Jin Chen
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-05-04

5.  Automated Sequence Design of 3D Polyhedral Wireframe DNA Origami with Honeycomb Edges.

Authors:  Hyungmin Jun; Tyson R Shepherd; Kaiming Zhang; William P Bricker; Shanshan Li; Wah Chiu; Mark Bathe
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Global and local mechanical properties control endonuclease reactivity of a DNA origami nanostructure.

Authors:  Antonio Suma; Alex Stopar; Allen W Nicholson; Matteo Castronovo; Vincenzo Carnevale
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Meta-DNA structures.

Authors:  Guangbao Yao; Fei Zhang; Fei Wang; Tianhuan Peng; Hao Liu; Erik Poppleton; Petr Šulc; Shuoxing Jiang; Lan Liu; Chen Gong; Xinxin Jing; Xiaoguo Liu; Lihua Wang; Yan Liu; Chunhai Fan; Hao Yan
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 24.427

8.  A Programmable DNA-Silicification-Based Nanocavity for Single-Molecule Plasmonic Sensing.

Authors:  Le Liang; Peng Zheng; Chi Zhang; Ishan Barman
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 30.849

9.  Scaling Up DNA Origami Lattice Assembly.

Authors:  Yang Xin; Boxuan Shen; Mauri A Kostiainen; Guido Grundmeier; Mario Castro; Veikko Linko; Adrian Keller
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 10.  DNA Assembly-Based Stimuli-Responsive Systems.

Authors:  Shasha Lu; Jianlei Shen; Chunhai Fan; Qian Li; Xiurong Yang
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 16.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.