Literature DB >> 30012759

In Vitro MIC Values of Rifampin and Ethambutol and Treatment Outcome in Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease.

Yong Pil Chong1, Kyung-Wook Jo2, Byoung Soo Kwon3, Mi-Na Kim4, Heungsup Sung4, Younsuck Koh3, Woo-Sung Kim3, Jin-Woo Song3, Yeon-Mok Oh3, Sang-Do Lee3, Sei Won Lee3, Jae-Seung Lee3, Chae-Man Lim3, Chang-Min Choi3, Jin-Won Huh3, Sang-Bum Hong3, Sojung Park5, Tae Sun Shim3.   

Abstract

Although it is known that the in vitro MICs of rifampin and ethambutol are poorly correlated with the clinical response in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease (MAC-LD), evidence for this is limited. This study investigated the association between treatment outcome and the in vitro MICs of rifampin and ethambutol in patients with MAC-LD. Among patients diagnosed with macrolide-susceptible MAC-LD between January 2008 and December 2013, 274 patients who were treated with a standard regimen for ≥12 months until August 2017 and whose in vitro MIC results were available were enrolled at a tertiary referral center in South Korea. The MICs of antimicrobial agents were determined using the broth microdilution method. The mean age of the included patients was 60.4 years. The overall treatment success rate was 79.6% (218/274 patients) and tended to decrease with increasing MICs of rifampin and ethambutol, particularly at MICs of ≥8 μg/ml. Treatment success rate was significantly different between MAC isolates with MICs of ≥8 μg/ml for rifampin and ethambutol and those with MICs of <8 μg/ml for rifampin and/or ethambutol (64.9% versus 85.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that an MIC of ≥8 μg/ml for both drugs and initial sputum acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smear positivity were independent risk factors for an unfavorable response (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.154, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.641 to 6.063, and P = 0.001 for an MIC of ≥8 μg/ml; adjusted OR = 2.769, 95% CI = 1.420 to 5.399, and P = 0.003 for initial sputum AFB smear positivity). These findings suggest that the in vitro MICs of rifampin and ethambutol may be related to treatment outcome in MAC-LD.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MIC; Mycobacterium avium complex; ethambutol; rifampin; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30012759      PMCID: PMC6153803          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00491-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  38 in total

1.  Prognostic factors of 634 HIV-negative patients with Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

Authors:  Makoto Hayashi; Noboru Takayanagi; Tetsu Kanauchi; Yousuke Miyahara; Tsutomu Yanagisawa; Yutaka Sugita
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung disease: the top ten essentials.

Authors:  Timothy R Aksamit; Julie V Philley; David E Griffith
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.415

3.  Clinical and molecular analysis of macrolide resistance in Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

Authors:  David E Griffith; Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Brett Langsjoen; Yansheng Zhang; Xi Pan; William Girard; Kenwyn Nelson; James Caccitolo; Julio Alvarez; Sara Shepherd; Rebecca Wilson; Edward A Graviss; Richard J Wallace
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 4.  The epidemiologic relationship between tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  S K Brode; C L Daley; T K Marras
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Routine use of PCR-reverse cross-blot hybridization assay for rapid identification of Mycobacterium species growing in liquid media.

Authors:  M Sanguinetti; B Posteraro; F Ardito; S Zanetti; A Cingolani; L Sechi; A De Luca; L Ortona; G Fadda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Standardized combination antibiotic treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

Authors:  Yun Su Sim; Hye Yun Park; Kyeongman Jeon; Gee Young Suh; O Jung Kwon; Won-Jung Koh
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 7.  Update on pulmonary disease due to non-tuberculous mycobacteria.

Authors:  Jason E Stout; Won-Jung Koh; Wing Wai Yew
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Response to therapy of pulmonary Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection correlates with results of in vitro susceptibility testing.

Authors:  C R Horsburgh; U G Mason; L B Heifets; K Southwick; J Labrecque; M D Iseman
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1987-02

9.  Increasing trend of isolation of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in a tertiary university hospital in South Korea.

Authors:  Jung-Wan Yoo; Kyung-Wook Jo; Mi Na Kim; Sang Do Lee; Woo Sung Kim; Dong Soon Kim; Tae Sun Shim
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2012-05-29

10.  Analysis of drug treatment outcome in clarithromycin-resistant Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kadota; Hirotoshi Matsui; Takashi Hirose; Junko Suzuki; Minako Saito; Tomohiro Akaba; Kouichi Kobayashi; Shunsuke Akashi; Masahiro Kawashima; Atsuhisa Tamura; Hideaki Nagai; Shinobu Akagawa; Nobuyuki Kobayashi; Ken Ohta
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  8 in total

1.  Relationship between Resistance to Ethambutol and Rifampin and Clinical Outcomes in Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Seong Mi Moon; Su-Young Kim; Dae Hun Kim; Hee Jae Huh; Nam Yong Lee; Byung Woo Jhun
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.938

Review 2.  Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Considerations in the Drug Treatment of Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Andrew Burke; Daniel Smith; Chris Coulter; Scott C Bell; Rachel Thomson; Jason A Roberts
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.577

3.  Sitafloxacin-Containing Regimen for the Treatment of Refractory Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease.

Authors:  Takanori Asakura; Shoji Suzuki; Hanako Fukano; Satoshi Okamori; Tatsuya Kusumoto; Yoshifumi Uwamino; Takunori Ogawa; Matsuo So; Shunsuke Uno; Ho Namkoong; Mitsunori Yoshida; Hirofumi Kamata; Makoto Ishii; Tomoyasu Nishimura; Yoshihiko Hoshino; Naoki Hasegawa
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Outcome of shorter treatment duration in non-cavitary nodular bronchiectatic Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

Authors:  Yea Eun Park; Yong Pil Chong; Ye-Jee Kim; Ock-Hwa Kim; Byoung Soo Kwon; Tae Sun Shim; Kyung-Wook Jo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  In vitro assessment of 17 antimicrobial agents against clinical Mycobacterium avium complex isolates.

Authors:  Siran Lin; Wenya Hua; Shiyong Wang; Yu Zhang; Xinchang Chen; Hong Liu; Lingyun Shao; Jiazhen Chen; Wenhong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.465

6.  Antimicrobial susceptibility and minimum inhibitory concentration distribution of common clinically relevant non-tuberculous mycobacterial isolates from the respiratory tract.

Authors:  Guiqing He; Lianpeng Wu; Qingyong Zheng; Xiangao Jiang
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 5.348

7.  Rational Choice of Antibiotics and Media for Mycobacterium avium Complex Drug Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Jérémy Jaffré; Alexandra Aubry; Thomas Maitre; Florence Morel; Florence Brossier; Jérôme Robert; Wladimir Sougakoff; Nicolas Veziris
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Treatment Outcomes after Discontinuation of Ethambutol due to Adverse Events in Mycobacterium avium Complex Lung Disease.

Authors:  Yong Shik Kwon; Byoung Soo Kwon; Ock Hwa Kim; Yea Eun Park; Tae Sun Shim; Yong Pil Chong; Kyung Wook Jo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.