Keith R Thulborn1, Chao Ma2, Chenhao Sun3, Ian C Atkinson4, Theodore Claiborne4, Reiner Umathum5, Steven M Wright3, Zhi-Pei Liang6. 1. Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1801 West Taylor St., MC 707, Suite 1307, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Electronic address: mrix@ameritech.net. 2. Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua Street, Suite 660, Boston, MA 02114, USA. 3. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, Wisenbaker Engineering Building, College Station, TX 77843-3128, USA. 4. Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1801 West Taylor St., MC 707, Suite 1307, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. 5. German Cancer Center (DKFZ), Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. 6. Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 North Mathews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Non-uniform B1+ excitation and high specific absorption rates (SAR) compromise proton MR imaging of human brain at 9.4 T (400.5 MHz). By combining a transmit/receive surface coil array using serial transmission of individual coils with a total generalized variation reconstruction of images from all coils, acceptable quality human brain imaging is demonstrated. METHODS: B0 is shimmed using sodium MR imaging (105.4 MHz) with a birdcage coil. Proton MR imaging is performed with an excitation/receive array of surface coils. The modified FLASH pulse sequence transmits serially across each coil within the array thereby distributing SAR in time and space. All coils operate in receive mode. Although the excitation profile of each transmit coil is non-uniform, the sensitivity profile estimated from the non-transmit receive coils provides an acceptable sensitivity correction. Signals from all coils are combined in a total generalized variation (TGV) reconstruction to provide a full field of view image at maximum signal to noise (SNR) performance. RESULTS: High-resolution images across the human head are demonstrated with acceptable uniformity and SNR. CONCLUSION: Proton MR imaging of the human brain is possible with acceptable uniformity at low SAR at 9.4 Tesla using this serial excitation and parallel reception strategy with TGV reconstruction.
PURPOSE: Non-uniform B1+ excitation and high specific absorption rates (SAR) compromise proton MR imaging of human brain at 9.4 T (400.5 MHz). By combining a transmit/receive surface coil array using serial transmission of individual coils with a total generalized variation reconstruction of images from all coils, acceptable quality human brain imaging is demonstrated. METHODS: B0 is shimmed using sodium MR imaging (105.4 MHz) with a birdcage coil. Proton MR imaging is performed with an excitation/receive array of surface coils. The modified FLASH pulse sequence transmits serially across each coil within the array thereby distributing SAR in time and space. All coils operate in receive mode. Although the excitation profile of each transmit coil is non-uniform, the sensitivity profile estimated from the non-transmit receive coils provides an acceptable sensitivity correction. Signals from all coils are combined in a total generalized variation (TGV) reconstruction to provide a full field of view image at maximum signal to noise (SNR) performance. RESULTS: High-resolution images across the human head are demonstrated with acceptable uniformity and SNR. CONCLUSION: Proton MR imaging of the human brain is possible with acceptable uniformity at low SAR at 9.4 Tesla using this serial excitation and parallel reception strategy with TGV reconstruction.
Keywords:
9.4 Tesla; Human brain; Image uniformity; Proton MRI; SENSE reconstruction; Specific absorption rate; Surface coil arrays; Ultrahigh magnetic field
Authors: Stephan Orzada; Stefan Maderwald; Benedikt Andreas Poser; Andreas K Bitz; Harald H Quick; Mark E Ladd Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Thomas Vaughan; Lance DelaBarre; Carl Snyder; Jinfeng Tian; Can Akgun; Devashish Shrivastava; Wanzahn Liu; Chris Olson; Gregor Adriany; John Strupp; Peter Andersen; Anand Gopinath; Pierre-Francois van de Moortele; Michael Garwood; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sebastian C Niesporek; Stefan H Hoffmann; Moritz C Berger; Nadia Benkhedah; Aaron Kujawa; Peter Bachert; Armin M Nagel Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: G Shajan; Christian Mirkes; Kai Buckenmaier; Jens Hoffmann; Rolf Pohmann; Klaus Scheffler Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Keith Thulborn; Elaine Lui; Jonathan Guntin; Saad Jamil; Ziqi Sun; Theodore C Claiborne; Ian C Atkinson Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 4.044